Guest guest Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 Thank you for your comments on this subject. What I was really concerned with was the fact that many Western Polyamorous groups claim that they use their se & ual relationships as a way to raise the Kundalini. I feel and does also, that the raising of K should be done on an individual basis, and many Poly Pods (groups of 3 or more) use their se & ual preferences as a way of justifying something sacred. As mentioned the Hierodule/Temple Pr*stitutes acted as sacred vessels for those wishing to receive ecstatic bliss through s & x. They were both respected and revered as an important part of the community in ancient Egypt, Greece, Rome, & Northern Africa, to name a few. Poly and relationships with multiple partners are common in many cultures and also legal in many countries. In the West we consider the ideal and legal relationship to involve only two people and visiting 'ladies of the night' for any reason is frowned upon. The ideal IMHO would be for people to conduct personal relationships in any way they see fit & safe, as long as no children were involved, everyone was consenting, and nothing was done behind another's back in order to cause them emotional pain. As far as spiritual development and Kundalini are concerned it is best left to an individual to search and find on their own. Thanks Brandi, Thanks Chrism, Skydancer x , Brandi Jasmine <jazztalk wrote: > > At 03:14 PM 8/17/2008, you wrote: > >Being within the integrity of your > >culture is what matters. Being within the moral structure as is > >defined in your culture is the important quality. > > Can I disagree on this one? I would say being within the integrity of *your* moral code is what matters. My moral code is definitely not in harmony with the prevailing moral code of what I see as my " culture " . I see a lot of ambiguous morality reflected in the popular culture. It really seems to be " if it feels good, do it " . The religious culture I was raised in was *not* ambiguous, but it's uptight, fear-based and downright bigoted, especially where it comes to the role of women and treatment of homosexuals. > > I personally would not be happy in a polyamourous relationship, because that is outside my moral and ethical code (not to mention my safety zone) ... but that has nothing to do with my " culture " . > > Brandi > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.