Guest guest Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 Yes you are correct John but where is healing even mentioned here? Ah you mean as is gifted through the blood. Ok I see where you at here. Permission is given from those that receive blood by virtue of being in a society that provides the service. They don't do it in parts of Mongolia. So unless a person has indicated on the drivers license that they do not wish to be revived or have a DNR (do not revive) document then the society will provide blood from donations for the individual to perhaps recover and further their existence. So there is a choice and by virtue of this choice is permission granted. As far as the aspects of the Kundalini infusing the blood and providing activations permission is also granted by many of the same devices of society. Karma will trump permission. One could argue that it was Karma that brought them to the accident in the first place where a society would provide the means of not only resuscitation but also of activation. There are many variables when Karma is added into the mix and it always is. I can only speak in variations of what is typical and for what is given to me regarding the subject. After having worked in a blood bank and witnessing the corruption of the organization I have discontinued my donations. This is as much from the corruption as from the perspective of leaving the Kundalini blood where it is for the time being. I do feel that the Kundalini blood is best left in the body of the Kundalini awakening person. That's just my perspective. Not saying in the future my blood will not be provided but I will listen to the directives of the divine in me before that occurs again. I do not feel it is harmful as a gift of love to those who can use it. In the dark and painful moments of a person's life I feel the Kundalini blood can give some of its exaltation to those in need. And sometimes a gift of divinity is controlled more by the divine itself than by any individual purpose or intention of those who carry it. We are vessels of the divine and we will share that which is part of us if that divinity gives the directive. We may not even know it as it is done. And we just might as we allow someone to puncture our body and drain the life force from it in a way that will help another with out severe harm to the donating person. For me I will keep the blood in me where it is for the time being. But for others that will be a personal choice that they and the divine in them will determine. My take on it. - blessings John - chrism , " JOHN. M " <john.mathieson1 wrote: to me there seems to be of a double mindedness reflection. > I thought permission should be obtained before healing with kundalini should be performed. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 transmitting energy into the blood is no different that magnetizing the blood with bark remedies if one knows the exact remedy needed. I will send healing on some occasions without permission though I always my thought so that it is only to perform healing if it is accepted by the sufferer it is not forceful. Is this what is being done when the blood is charged with I. My feeling about this matter is that it is not. Maybe I am Wrong? Blood plasma can be used in may instances though maybe not all? Though if a close family member or friend was in need I would give. You say that there is corruption in the blood collection industry may be that why they call it a bank. :-] John. M - Tuesday, January 20, 2009 1:47 PM Re: "fully awakened" - Blood Yes you are correct John but where is healing even mentioned here? Ah you mean as is gifted through the blood. Ok I see where you at here. Permission is given from those that receive blood by virtue of being in a society that provides the service. They don't do it in parts of Mongolia. So unless a person has indicated on the drivers license that they do not wish to be revived or have a DNR (do not revive) document then the society will provide blood from donations for the individual to perhaps recover and further their existence. So there is a choice and by virtue of this choice is permission granted. As far as the aspects of the Kundalini infusing the blood and providing activations permission is also granted by many of the same devices of society. Karma will trump permission. One could argue that it was Karma that brought them to the accident in the first place where a society would provide the means of not only resuscitation but also of activation. There are many variables when Karma is added into the mix and it always is. I can only speak in variations of what is typical and for what is given to me regarding the subject.After having worked in a blood bank and witnessing the corruption of the organization I have discontinued my donations. This is as much from the corruption as from the perspective of leaving the Kundalini blood where it is for the time being. I do feel that the Kundalini blood is best left in the body of the Kundalini awakening person. That's just my perspective. Not saying in the future my blood will not be provided but I will listen to the directives of the divine in me before that occurs again. I do not feel it is harmful as a gift of love to those who can use it. In the dark and painful moments of a person's life I feel the Kundalini blood can give some of its exaltation to those in need.And sometimes a gift of divinity is controlled more by the divine itself than by any individual purpose or intention of those who carry it. We are vessels of the divine and we will share that which is part of us if that divinity gives the directive. We may not even know it as it is done. And we just might as we allow someone to puncture our body and drain the life force from it in a way that will help another with out severe harm to the donating person.For me I will keep the blood in me where it is for the time being. But for others that will be a personal choice that they and the divine in them will determine. My take on it. - blessings John - chrism , "JOHN. M" <john.mathieson1 wrote:to me there seems to be of a double mindedness reflection.> I thought permission should be obtained before healing with kundalini should be performed.> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2009 Report Share Posted January 19, 2009 It isn't exactly the same as your bark remedy charging John if you are using a magnet or magnetism. But your statement reads as if you know for sure and for a fact exactly what is and what isn't. A statement that defies any kind of discussion yes? No room for comment. So your statement stands alone as you have phrased it. > transmitting energy into the blood is no different that magnetizing the blood with bark remedies if one knows the exact remedy needed.< I will pray in certain ways for someone suffering and in this way I surrender the outcome to the " Divine Will " and this I do not ask permission for. Some folks might not like the idea of anyone praying for them so I do this privately. For those who do not enjoy the prayers I ask that they have their awful traffic accidents in private as well. Seems only fair. Kundalini healing as has been given to me is something that must be given permission for. As it is in many ways a directed and intentional incursion into living tissue. It isn't hurtful but some changes can be made that will have consequences for the person. Not always and not always in ways that are noticed but certainly in ways that will require an equation of conscious agreement between both the giver and the receiver. Sometimes the Kundalini itself will literally pour itself into a person. It will pour from the fingers, the heart, the head, and the entire body into another person. In this case there is no permission that is asked as Kundalini is a divine force and it knows far more about what is and isn't appropriate for what can be given to another individual. Karma is playing a role here as well. The corruption in this blood bank is indeed due to greed and ego. Like most corruption it will have the course of an infection. The infection will burst and it will be cleansed or it will grow until it kills the body. This outcome is still an unknown though the infection appears to be growing stronger. - blessings John. - chrism Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2009 Report Share Posted January 20, 2009 No my statement was not definitive chrism my full statement was finished with Maybe I am Wrong ? and was included in the same paragraph intentionally. transmitting energy into the blood is no different that magnetizing the blood with bark remedies if one knows the exact remedy needed. I will send healing on some occasions without permission though I always my thought so that it is only to perform healing if it is accepted by the sufferer it is not forceful. Is this what is being done when the blood is charged with I. My feeling about this matter is that it is not. Maybe I am Wrong? The purpose of the post was to ask for an explanation, True you can only talk for your self and I believe you have explained it in regards to yourself. Though for the other person who is charging it maybe there can be no explanation. Regards John .M Ps where I say, "is charged with I' it should have been "is charged with K" - Tuesday, January 20, 2009 3:41 PM Re: "fully awakened" - Blood It isn't exactly the same as your bark remedy charging John if you are using a magnet or magnetism. But your statement reads as if you know for sure and for a fact exactly what is and what isn't. A statement that defies any kind of discussion yes? No room for comment. So your statement stands alone as you have phrased it.> transmitting energy into the blood is no different that magnetizing the blood with bark remedies if one knows the exact remedy needed.<I will pray in certain ways for someone suffering and in this way I surrender the outcome to the "Divine Will" and this I do not ask permission for. Some folks might not like the idea of anyone praying for them so I do this privately. For those who do not enjoy the prayers I ask that they have their awful traffic accidents in private as well. Seems only fair.Kundalini healing as has been given to me is something that must be given permission for. As it is in many ways a directed and intentional incursion into living tissue. It isn't hurtful but some changes can be made that will have consequences for the person. Not always and not always in ways that are noticed but certainly in ways that will require an equation of conscious agreement between both the giver and the receiver. Sometimes the Kundalini itself will literally pour itself into a person. It will pour from the fingers, the heart, the head, and the entire body into another person. In this case there is no permission that is asked as Kundalini is a divine force and it knows far more about what is and isn't appropriate for what can be given to another individual. Karma is playing a role here as well.The corruption in this blood bank is indeed due to greed and ego. Like most corruption it will have the course of an infection. The infection will burst and it will be cleansed or it will grow until it kills the body. This outcome is still an unknown though the infection appears to be growing stronger. - blessings John. - chrism Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.