Guest guest Posted August 19, 2009 Report Share Posted August 19, 2009 First please understand that I have no s & xual interest in any person I am teaching. Even inside of the tantric forms. I honor and respect the separation of teacher and student within the accepted social standards of our expectations with in the western societies. I am comfortable with this and do not seek s & xual fulfillment. There are much better fulfillment's believe me! Kundalini is part of the human system and it has a s & xual agenda. Not merely of enjoyment but of procreation. Of balance and of the sacred blending of the sacred genders. These are important areas inside of the Kundalini that I purposefully do not explore here on this group or even in the other groups where this subject can be discussed. We have rules about this and expectations about this in our society and for me to teach Kundalini I must adopt and work within these accepted standards. I am fine with this and you can see that by the lack of focus upon this subject here. Shakti doesnt operate within our societal moral compass. She does as she wants, when she wants, and how she wants. Same with Shiva or the sacred male. Kundalini has s & xual reference. It is Kundalini that even allows us to have s & x and procreate so within the awakening of Kundalini the s & xual component will be experienced. With out a partner that is going through the Kundalini Shakti may provide the student with the familiar teacher or another " blank " face person to help the student realize certain developments within the s & xual context. She comes to men this way as well and she will use herself or feminine figures from their past or present or the teacher as a female for this purpose. I do not have active s & x with anyone but the Shakti will place me in those situations as a way of giving that person the teaching. I am not aware of it as I choose not to partake of these kinds of teachings and yet my image and " feel " and that part of me that is KUNDALINI will do what needs to be done for the benefit of the student. It has caused some problems with married couples in the membership before and I have been accused of the worst kind of infractions because of this. Some members have left because of this and I am saddened yet I can understand how they would and could misinterpret the dream experience for a sexual predatory one. I have tried to explain but no amount of explanation can give support to a trust that has been abrogated in such a way I feel. I ask Shakti not to do this but she does do it " sometimes " yet most of those that have this are able to understand their way through it. S & xual issues are not OK to discuss in our society and most definitely not having those lessons given from teacher who isnt supposed to be inside of those kind of teachings. Shakti doesnt care. I am her marrionette. And the divine feminine will use me for the benefit of her Kundalini children no matter what the social taboos are of our society. So everyone please understand this. If the " Shaktichrism " comes to you for these teachings and you have a concern please know that I as your teacher am not preying or trying to assault or use anyone in this way for this or any other kind of s & xual agenda. There is no interest from me for you in this way. It is a teaching from the Shakti for you. That is all it is and for me most of the time it is as though nothing has occurred. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2009 Report Share Posted August 19, 2009 Dear Chrism, I agree with you, because a true Yogi enjoys with the bliss within,such yogis or teachers need no external objects of pleasure. I have read somewhere that some emotional students get more attracted to the embodiment of the quality than quality itself.........................shrikant --- On Wed, 19/8/09, chrism <> wrote: <> Re: Visitations - S & X Wednesday, 19 August, 2009, 12:31 PM First please understand that I have no s & xual interest in any person I am teaching. Even inside of the tantric forms. I honor and respect the separation of teacher and student within the accepted social standards of our expectations with in the western societies. I am comfortable with this and do not seek s & xual fulfillment. There are much better fulfillment' s believe me! Kundalini is part of the human system and it has a s & xual agenda. Not merely of enjoyment but of procreation. Of balance and of the sacred blending of the sacred genders. These are important areas inside of the Kundalini that I purposefully do not explore here on this group or even in the other groups where this subject can be discussed. We have rules about this and expectations about this in our society and for me to teach Kundalini I must adopt and work within these accepted standards. I am fine with this and you can see that by the lack of focus upon this subject here. Shakti doesnt operate within our societal moral compass. She does as she wants, when she wants, and how she wants. Same with Shiva or the sacred male. Kundalini has s & xual reference. It is Kundalini that even allows us to have s & x and procreate so within the awakening of Kundalini the s & xual component will be experienced. With out a partner that is going through the Kundalini Shakti may provide the student with the familiar teacher or another " blank " face person to help the student realize certain developments within the s & xual context. She comes to men this way as well and she will use herself or feminine figures from their past or present or the teacher as a female for this purpose. I do not have active s & x with anyone but the Shakti will place me in those situations as a way of giving that person the teaching. I am not aware of it as I choose not to partake of these kinds of teachings and yet my image and " feel " and that part of me that is KUNDALINI will do what needs to be done for the benefit of the student. It has caused some problems with married couples in the membership before and I have been accused of the worst kind of infractions because of this. Some members have left because of this and I am saddened yet I can understand how they would and could misinterpret the dream experience for a sexual predatory one. I have tried to explain but no amount of explanation can give support to a trust that has been abrogated in such a way I feel. I ask Shakti not to do this but she does do it " sometimes " yet most of those that have this are able to understand their way through it. S & xual issues are not OK to discuss in our society and most definitely not having those lessons given from teacher who isnt supposed to be inside of those kind of teachings. Shakti doesnt care. I am her marrionette. And the divine feminine will use me for the benefit of her Kundalini children no matter what the social taboos are of our society. So everyone please understand this. If the " Shaktichrism " comes to you for these teachings and you have a concern please know that I as your teacher am not preying or trying to assault or use anyone in this way for this or any other kind of s & xual agenda. There is no interest from me for you in this way. It is a teaching from the Shakti for you. That is all it is and for me most of the time it is as though nothing has occurred. - Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click here http://cricket. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2009 Report Share Posted August 19, 2009 Yes Shrikanth I agree with you as well but what is being said is that it isnt about the Yogi or the teacher. It is about the Shakti Kundalini and the teaching that is being given within a specific use of a teacher involved format for the student. The presence and use of the Guru or yogi or teacher by divinity for an education is merely as a tool of the teaching like the chalk on the board. - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2009 Report Share Posted August 19, 2009 shaktiChrism loose aboot the hoose..aughhh!! quick get the kitchen knifes ,its time for snake steak! lol ok I know Very childish, ok yah..i'll drift off now.. I have had a shaktichrism dream, my dream entity made you but absolutely no trouser snakes were happily involved at all, phew.. it said it was you but it didnt look like you ,so i know when im being punked anyway " you " helped me to fix up a building, and as i went to art school and began as a designer , i guess it's not style pointers that you gave me :)I imagine it is my spiritual house that is still needing work...working on it boss my main point , (serious )is my ever morphing dream entity shakti/kundalini or something else? you will say ask yourself... I did...I don't know (I think so but the universe is unending)..so im asking you for you take dear chrism purple , " chrism " <> wrote: > > First please understand that I have no s & xual interest in any person I am teaching. Even inside of the tantric forms. I honor and respect the separation of teacher and student within the accepted social standards of our expectations with in the western societies. I am comfortable with this and do not seek s & xual fulfillment. There are much better fulfillment's believe me! > > Kundalini is part of the human system and it has a s & xual agenda. Not merely of enjoyment but of procreation. Of balance and of the sacred blending of the sacred genders. These are important areas inside of the Kundalini that I purposefully do not explore here on this group or even in the other groups where this subject can be discussed. We have rules about this and expectations about this in our society and for me to teach Kundalini I must adopt and work within these accepted standards. I am fine with this and you can see that by the lack of focus upon this subject here. > > Shakti doesnt operate within our societal moral compass. She does as she wants, when she wants, and how she wants. Same with Shiva or the sacred male. > > Kundalini has s & xual reference. It is Kundalini that even allows us to have s & x and procreate so within the awakening of Kundalini the s & xual component will be experienced. With out a partner that is going through the Kundalini Shakti may provide the student with the familiar teacher or another " blank " face person to help the student realize certain developments within the s & xual context. > She comes to men this way as well and she will use herself or feminine figures from their past or present or the teacher as a female for this purpose. > > I do not have active s & x with anyone but the Shakti will place me in those situations as a way of giving that person the teaching. I am not aware of it as I choose not to partake of these kinds of teachings and yet my image and " feel " and that part of me that is KUNDALINI will do what needs to be done for the benefit of the student. > > It has caused some problems with married couples in the membership before and I have been accused of the worst kind of infractions because of this. Some members have left because of this and I am saddened yet I can understand how they would and could misinterpret the dream experience for a sexual predatory one. > > I have tried to explain but no amount of explanation can give support to a trust that has been abrogated in such a way I feel. I ask Shakti not to do this but she does do it " sometimes " yet most of those that have this are able to understand their way through it. > > S & xual issues are not OK to discuss in our society and most definitely not having those lessons given from teacher who isnt supposed to be inside of those kind of teachings. Shakti doesnt care. I am her marrionette. And the divine feminine will use me for the benefit of her Kundalini children no matter what the social taboos are of our society. > > So everyone please understand this. If the " Shaktichrism " comes to you for these teachings and you have a concern please know that I as your teacher am not preying or trying to assault or use anyone in this way for this or any other kind of s & xual agenda. There is no interest from me for you in this way. It is a teaching from the Shakti for you. That is all it is and for me most of the time it is as though nothing has occurred. - > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2009 Report Share Posted August 19, 2009 Hi Chrism, I've done this too only consciously, and I think maybe I do it unconsciously now from the occasional reactions I get. I didn't much like thinking of myself as a 'succubus' and was quite engaged with it for a time - proud/ashamed, 'can I use this' 'should I use this' I have a power' - all the ughs . I'm more relaxed about it now though. It's just something that happens, it's a part of our nature and part of our normal subconscious engagements with others, doesn't have to mean anything more. I'm mainly in awe of the amazing power of the energy now. Guys would feel me as a tangible presence and even now if I think about stroking someone on the face and they're attuned, they get it as a physical sensation. I know it doesn't go where it's not agreed to, as well - there's nothing wrong in it but sorting through the ego reactions has been quite a task.. The lesson for me is detaching and recognising that this can be quite discombobulating for others and learning that it's not about 'me' but it's about their gift and their experience, doesn't have to mean more.. and to leave the discombobulations to just be - a painful ego reaction but ultimately not my concern, just a lesson. It's never happened to me personally, or only in fragmented ways - I tend to assume it's just 'divine male' and leave it at that. sometimes wish it would - I'd love to feel that loved, and I _know_ how much love goes into it ) Thanks for mentioning it, it's helped to think back through it all! Amanda , " chrism " <> wrote: > > First please understand that I have no s & xual interest in any person I am teaching. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2009 Report Share Posted August 20, 2009 , " chrism " <> wrote: > > Yes Shrikanth I agree with you as well but what is being said is that it isnt about the Yogi or the teacher. It is about the Shakti Kundalini and the teaching that is being given within a specific use of a teacher involved format for the student. The presence and use of the Guru or yogi or teacher by divinity for an education is merely as a tool of the teaching like the chalk on the board. - > Dear chrism, I am aware of this,I know formless K sometimes takes form of C.....;Second reference was regarding what Lord Buddha said to his disciple Sangamitra ...............Shrikant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.