A plausible idea worth your consideration

[seekeroftruth1]

Your beliefs are based on emotional balance, according to the Law of Emotional Balance. You became attracted to specific ideas or beliefs because of the role those ideas or beliefs play in your emotional balance. Your beliefs can be changed when other sources of emotions are changed as well. People can change their beliefs just as they can fall out of love with one person and in love with another. We have specific beliefs to cope with our environments. Some people cope with the sadness caused by their environment by using intoxicating substances; others cope with their environments by having specific beliefs or habits.

The world is filled with billions of followers of different religions. People are correct for having their individual beliefs because their beliefs keep them more emotionally balanced than they would be without those beliefs. Some people may not believe empirical evidence provided by scientists because if they were to believe in the empirical evidence then they would probably become emotionally unbalanced based on their other sources of emotions.

The Law of Emotional Balance makes the claim that emotional balance is the result of a law of nature or the universe called the Law of Emotional Balance. The Law of Emotional Balance states that a person will experience as much happiness as sadness before being allowed to die.

Even though we may never be able to absolutely prove the Law of Emotional Balance because it seems impossible to quantify all of the emotions a person will experience in a lifetime, that does not mean that there is no evidence pointing toward the existence of this law. Even without a way of quantifying all emotions we can still determine if the Law of Emotional Balance is a possibility or outright impossible. Falsifiable experiments exist to build a case in support of emotional balance as a law.

The fact remains that in order for the Law of Emotional Balance to be true, certain base requirements would have to be met. The universe would need to have uncertainty programmed into it because without uncertainty, we could predict the future and take in mostly happiness and minimal sadness and violate the Law of Emotional Balance. We would need to have dreams where people's defenses are lowered so they could be forced to experience specific emotions needed to prevent the Law of Emotional Balance from being violated. We would need physiological balance in cells "Homeostasis" because cells are also living organisms that comprise other organisms like humans. We would need unusual/unique cultural structures with flexibility "Sins/penance/religion, laws, punishments, government...... The list goes on... Since all of the base requirements for the Law of Emotional Balance are met, why not try to test to see if emotional balance is maintained by a law...

Conservation laws prevent charged particles from turning into pure energy unless they are neutralized with equal and opposite charges. Emotions and electricity may very well be directly tied together so it is not a too much of a stretch, to say that there may be a conservation law that governs emotions. The Law of Emotional Balance argues that there may very well be a reservoir of emotional energy and this reservoir is forced to follow the Law of Emotional Balance. It is this reservoir that many people have come to believe is God or God’s active hand in impacting a seemingly causally closed world governed by the laws of physics.

The Law of Emotional Balance still leaves room to support that there is a creator of the universe, but the Law of Emotional Balance supports the notion that the world is causally closed and that all of the laws of emotion are what has given mankind the impression that there is an active presence that actively responds to our thoughts, feelings, desires, and necessities.

There is difference between thinking you can commit suicide at any time and actually committing suicide at any time. It has been scientifically proven that babies experience emotions in utero. It is an assumption to claim that babies are not emotionally balanced before their death. It is an assumption to claim that people starving in 3rd world countries do not become emotionally balanced before their death. It is an assumption that your religion is better than anyone else’s. All arguments against the Law of Emotional Balance are assumptions and when analyzed, each argument leaves plenty of room to support that the Law of Emotional Balance is still a possibility.

Stop accepting assumptions about the world and be open to realizing the underlying misconceptions that cause our ignorance of the truth. I am only trying to help and present an idea that is plausible and can grant you new perspective in solving your own problems.