dhruva.kartik Posted November 8, 2010 Report Share Posted November 8, 2010 I recently heard that the namam we see on Srinivasa Perumal's forehead was designed by the English as there was a conflict between vadagalai and thenkalai sects. When they could not decide which kind of namam thats supposed to be put, they approached the London court and they suggested this version of namam. Is that true??? Well, if thats really true, dont you think that we should put the namam as directed by Ramanujacharya? Cant the vadagalais and thenkalais resolve this problem themselves? Should we accept the intervention of a foreign authority in OUR religious matters and tirupati is one of the biggest religious centres in India. I dont know much about this issue, can anyone make things clearer about it?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.