Guest guest Posted July 5, 2003 Report Share Posted July 5, 2003 Adapted from Jan Lamprecht’s book Hollow Planets. The above drawing was sketched at higher latitudes by T. A Sergeant aboard the State’s Ship Nagoya back in 1928, one morning at 5:30. The drawing depicts streaks of cirrus clouds radiating as if they were streamers from a central maypole. Such sightings are not unheralded. Similar formations of cloud streaks have been so commonly observed in the past that British folklore has attached the name " wind reels " to them. Jan Lamprecht openly wonders if such parallel lines of clouds couldn’t be associated with some form of compression and decompression of humid air passing through an orifice near the poles. Could it be that what we are seeing in this drawing, and in similar observations, are spillover effects from the Earth’s hollow portion? Jan Lamprecht feels that pressure waves emanate from the hollow Earth, originally triggered by an internal sun, and travel to the lower atmosphere on the surface of the planet. Perhaps this is why weather can never be calculated accurately for more than short periods of time; there exists a whole dimension to our planet’s weather which we haven’t factored in. But it is not only the point-like polar origin of such cloud patterns which suggests that they actually originate in the hollow Earth. There also seems to exist a lateral relationship between the weather and aurorae, which seems to have its origin in the hollow portion. In the book " Hollow Planets," Jan Lamprecht tells us that " In the regions where the aurora is seen there is often a belief among the inhabitants of some link between the aurora and the weather. " Jan mentions native American indians, Finns and Scotts in this regard. Jan offers further evidence from Antartic explorers : " The Southern Cross expedition to Antartica wintered at Cape Adare ( 72* S ). During 1899 — 1900 they found that a violent storm would often follow from the South whenever a brilliant and active aurora had been seen ... This happened too often to be mere coincidence." Jan goes on to say that " Scientists doubt that such a relationship can exist because there is no known mechanism which can account for this." But he suggests that the aurorae are not causative of any type of weather pattern, but rather, indicative of weather originating in the hollow portion of the planet. At this point, the question becomes- by what mechanism could this come about? Well, first of all, it seems that the inner sun seems to control and regulate the aurora. According to Jan Lamprecht’s theory, positively charged ions from the solar winds enter the magnetosphere from above the polar openings, where there is a break in the resistence offered by the Earth’s magnetic field. These ions then become accelerated as they pass over and over again through the Earth’s inner cavity, and on out through the opposite polar orifice. Scientists feel that these ions only connect to the poles of the Earth and bounce back and forth between the poles on the outside of the planet in belts known as magnetic bottles. But, Jan Lamprecht’s Hollow Earth Theory offers a plausible alternative, that the magnetic lines of force are actually running through the planet, out the other side, circling back to the other pole and entering again, and that the ions become accelerated during this cycle. At some point, agitation by the inner sun causes these ions to empty out from their cycle of acceleration around the Earth and into the inner cavity through the polar orifice by bending the magnetic lines of force. As the ions come streaming through the upper atmosphere, glow is caused because the ions cause frictions with gases in the upper atmosphere. But our point here is that it is the same agitation by the inner sun which is causing both the aurorae as well as pressure waves which reach the surface of the planet. Thus, the aurora is not causative of weather patterns, but rather indicative of a delayed manifestation of weather originating from the inner sun. Let us consider more observations which link the aurorae to weather, now that we have an idea of the mechanism behind this connection. " In 1853 W. Steveson commented upon the possible link between the aurorae and the clouds. He stated that cirrostrati clouds resemble cirri in their tendency to arrange themselves into long, parallel bands. ... He commented that ‘ they appear frequently as concomitants of the aurora, so much so as to leave no doubt of a connecting influence between them and that phenomenon.’" " John Slatter wrote this in 1898: ‘ An old friend of mine told me 40 years ago that a relation of his, who commanded a cruiser in the channel had observed that whenever an aurora appeared the wind would blow hard from the S.W. in 48 hours. I have myself verified this as the unfailing result of my own observation ever since.’" " In the early 1970s, Walter Orr Roberts , president of the University Corporation of Atmospheric Research and Robert H. Olson, an Environmental Data Research meteorologist with NOAA, investigated the possibility of a relationship between weather and the aurora in the Gulf of Alaska. They ‘ ... appear to have confirmed a statistical relationship between the behavoir of certain atmospheric features over the Gulf of Alaska and geomagnetic storms. Apparently, low pressure troughs ... tend to intensify or deepen, in response to storms in the geomagnetic field, which are marked by displays of aurora. ‘ ... One-third of the troughs over the Gulf of Alaska eventually move into the central USA. It was concluded that ‘ those troughs preceded by aurora penetrate about 200 miles further south, and bring cooler weather with them.‘" Professor Niel Davis, of the University of Alaska and the author of the book The Aurora Watcher’s Handbook, tells us: " One study conducted some years ago gave at lest minor evidence that storms initiated in the North Pacific during magnetic storms ( times of major aruroal displays ) tended to grow more than those developing at other times." The above two statements suggest that the pressure waves, indicated in advance by the aurora, tend to drive weather patterns further downwards from the polar openings. Thus we have not a little observational evidence to the effect that the aurorae indicate ( but do not cause ) coming weather manifestations. Those readers who are not familiar with geophysics should know that these concepts are not only unknown in mainstream science, they are unimagined! Due to the fact that scientists have not been informed of the true configuration of our planet ( it is hollow ), they are unable to properly understand the phenomena which they see around them. For example, they cannot fully understand what causes the the weather and forecast it well in advance, nor can they understand how the positively charged ions enter through the Earth’s magnetic field and become accelerated; nor can they understand where the energy goes to, nor how it is regulated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.