Guest guest Posted September 24, 2005 Report Share Posted September 24, 2005 Adam and Eve (although) it may be different words in different religions is mentioned as the first man and woman. According to Kirshna who is Adam and Eve? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 25, 2005 Report Share Posted September 25, 2005 According to the non-Vedic religions, Adam and Eve were the first humans and they lived 6000 years ago. This is a complete non-sense according to the truth. As there are bones of man dating back to millions of years in Museums. According to the Vedic religion, Manu and Shatturupa were the first humans created after Brahma, that was 155 trillions years ago. There have been 7 Manus in the current cycle, we descend from the 7th Manu. Is it just a concidence that the first Man was called Manuj? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 25, 2005 Report Share Posted September 25, 2005 How do they measure 1,000,000 of years? Is it possible that there measuring tools are not accurate? Why then do all religions speak of Adam and Eve? Certainly there must of been a practical part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 25, 2005 Report Share Posted September 25, 2005 Not all religions speak of Adam and Eve. The Vedic scriptures do not mention them. They are the concoction of non-vedic religions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 25, 2005 Report Share Posted September 25, 2005 So then you think the rest of the world are fools then? and the Vedics are 100% correct? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 26, 2005 Report Share Posted September 26, 2005 The non-vedic religions are man made, only yhe vedic religion is not man made nor a one man creation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 26, 2005 Report Share Posted September 26, 2005 Omshanti. Learned guest wrote: -------------------------- According to the non-Vedic religions, Adam and Eve were the first humans and they lived 6000 years ago. This is a complete non-sense according to the truth. As there are bones of man dating back to millions of years in Museums. According to the Vedic religion, Manu and Shatturupa were the first humans created after Brahma, that was 155 trillions years ago. There have been 7 Manus in the current cycle, we descend from the 7th Manu. Is it just a concidence that the first Man was called Manuj? -------------------------- Learned guest is calling the scriptures of all other religions as non-sense while he himself is quoting that Manu and Shatturupa were the first humans created after Brahma, that was 155 trillions years ago. How did he arrive at such figure? Does it tally with the history or is it just an imagination? Is there any proof for such statements? With regards, On Godly service, Roohani sevadhari, Prajapita Brahmakumar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 26, 2005 Report Share Posted September 26, 2005 The 155 trillion years is based on the current age of Brahma. Brahma was the first living being created by Lord Vishnu 155 trillion years ago. Brahma then created the first man and women and all other living beings. The lifespan of Brahma is 311 trillion years and he is 50 years of his time (155 trillion years) and it's half way through his current day (2.1 billion years). One day of Brahma is 4.32 billion years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 26, 2005 Report Share Posted September 26, 2005 How did Vishnu create Brahma? How did Brahma create the two children ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 26, 2005 Report Share Posted September 26, 2005 If at all you want to be religious, abandon non-vedic religions and embrace Vaishnavam, or any of the Theistic paths in Hinduism. Nothing good can ever come out of non-vedic religions like Christianity and Islam. Give it up before it's too late. Worship Krishna and he'll reveal all the knowledge that you'll ever need. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 26, 2005 Report Share Posted September 26, 2005 I appreciate your well intentions but can you answer the questions I posed? Those numbers do not make sense to me. What do you mean by before it is to late? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 26, 2005 Report Share Posted September 26, 2005 The conclusion of the Bhagavad-gita is that the intelligent will abandon all varities of religion and just surrender onto Lord Krishna. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 27, 2005 Report Share Posted September 27, 2005 you used word 'according to' three times and according denies the authority of the source... which source do you believe in then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2005 Report Share Posted September 28, 2005 Learned guest is calling the scriptures of all other religions as non-sense while he himself is quoting that Manu and Shatturupa were the first humans created after Brahma, that was 155 trillions years ago. How did he arrive at such figure? Does it tally with the history or is it just an imagination? Is there any proof for such statements? What history does man know ? C-14 has a range of only 50000 years. I posted in another thread. Now answer me how is man capable of knowing history beyong this miniscule 50000 years ? Your inability to know hostory does not mean that men did not exist during those years as mentioned. On the contrary compare the non-sense of bramma kumaris, bible and torah claiming man was created 5000 years before , when there is clear evidence through your science that man existed for atleast million years or more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2005 Report Share Posted September 28, 2005 Look at what has happened in simply the last 100 years, Invention of the computer, internet, cars, airplane, medicines, cell phones, Television, satellite, Rocketships etc. If all this can be done in a 100 years then why not 5,000? Jesus roamed the earth 2,500 years ago so you are to say that millions of years ago there where other people here and who where they? Look how we have polluted the world in such a short time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2005 Report Share Posted September 28, 2005 All religions, including the vedic religions are man made. Your assumption that your religion is the direct word of god is no different than the right wing muslims or christians who make the same claims. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2005 Report Share Posted September 28, 2005 All religions, including the vedic religions are man made. Your assumption that your religion is the direct word of god is no different than the right wing muslims or christians who make the same claims. The authors of bible, torah or quran is well known to be human beings. Infact all these so called scriptures were written by human beings as per their own statements. That is not the case with Vedas. Even scientifically the authors of any portion Vedas could not be even traced. Why ? Max Muller(hater of Vedas) states that no force on earth will be able to find the origins of Vedas. Also traditionally it is well known that Vedas have no authors. Vedas are Apourasheya. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2005 Report Share Posted September 28, 2005 There is a difference between the religions you speak of and the direct relationship one can have with the Father. The difference here now is Father is here. Not someone trying to be the link between you and God. There are two Fathers for us. One Father is the Father of Humanity and the other Father is the one of all the souls. The Father and child is different. This is why Krishna cannot be God because he is depicted as a child who grows up. God does not have any body therefore does not come into Karma or cycle of birth and death. He is every pure and loving. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 28, 2005 Report Share Posted September 28, 2005 There is a difference between the religions you speak of and the direct relationship one can have with the Father. The difference here now is Father is here. Not someone trying to be the link between you and God. Some bogus teachings from bogus folowers of bogus teachers. There are two Fathers for us. One Father is the Father of Humanity and the other Father is the one of all the souls. The Father and child is different. This is why Krishna cannot be God because he is depicted as a child who grows up. Who told you Lord Krishna has material body like you or me. This is your fake guru's false teachings. Krishna is Sat, Chit, Ananda, and Ananta. As for the stories of growing up etc., Bhagavatam, Mahabharatha all explain that HE does it to mislead asuras and second to satisfy devotees with HIS presence among them. GOD can act as though HE grows up, as though HE is ignorant etc. God does not have any body therefore does not come into Karma or cycle of birth and death. He is every pure and loving. There fore your conclusion about Lord Krishna is wrong. Your fake teacher is also wrong on this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 You say God is ignorant? What fake teacher are you speaking of? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 You say God is ignorant? which fake god is this ? What fake teacher are you speaking of? Which fake god are you talking about ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 Adam and Eve represent the Dual principle of MAterial Nature... it is not up to religious scriptures this is Truth of any time or place... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 Adam and Eve represent the Dual principle of MAterial Nature... it is not up to religious scriptures this is Truth of any time or place... Adam and Eve are the so called first human beings mentioned in Tanach(old testament). Rest is your invention. Good luck forging more nonsense out of this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 30, 2005 Report Share Posted September 30, 2005 Accroding to Genesis, the world was created 6000 years ago and Adam and Eve were the first humans. Well, this is complete non-sense according to the bones of humans and animals dating back to millions of years. Which can be seen in Museums around the world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 1, 2005 Report Share Posted October 1, 2005 How do you know they are millions of years old? What proof do you have that dinasours are millions of years old? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.