Guest guest Posted February 25, 2006 Report Share Posted February 25, 2006 Hare Krishna I was reading the shlokas composed by various acharyas of the 4 sampradayas....The Brahma, Rudra and Kumara sampradayas accept Lord Buddha as a Avatar of Lord Narayana. But I went to Srivaishnavaism Website http://srivaishnavam.com/dasavatharam.html where they say Lord Sri Balarama & Lord Krishna as two different avaatars. Can anyone from the Sri Sampradaya tell me why their Sampradaya don't accept Lord Buddhs as a avatar. What was Sripad Ramanuja views on this? Thank you All glories to Prabhupada Hare Krishna Balakrishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savyasaci Posted February 26, 2006 Report Share Posted February 26, 2006 I have heard that SUpreme being take the body of sakyamuni.. to restablish the dharm of non violence or semething like, cos the vedic culture arrownd those times where killing animals in respect of the vedic sacrifices and enjoins. correct me if am wrong, but, as i remember it was called satya MUni, the true Muni. yesterday i have seen the movie and was names as sakyamuni. all glories to the assembled devotees ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 27, 2006 Report Share Posted February 27, 2006 Hare Krishna I just wanted to know why does the Sri Sampradaya does not accept Lord Buddha as a avatar of Lord Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.