Guest guest Posted September 25, 2004 Report Share Posted September 25, 2004 Caitanya upanishad was searched for far and wide by Bhaktivinode Thakura, and when he did find a ancient scripture entitled Caitanya Upanishad - which could be verified to be thousands of years old, other Hindu sampradayas still rejected it. Just because others rejected it, we should still judge it's credibility on the actual features of the text - and it is thousands of years old... Similarly many people blindly reject Brahma Samhita just because Caitanya translated the original...even though the text is mentioned as one of the original puranas... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 25, 2004 Report Share Posted September 25, 2004 The Kalisantarana Upanishad - Yajur Veda bhagavata AdipuruShasya nArAyaNasya nAmoccAraNamAtreNa nirdhRtakalir bhavati| nAradah punah papraccha tannAma kimiti | Tr: "By merely uttering the names of the Primeval Purusha, who is Bhagavan Narayana, one is freed from the clutches of Kali." Narada asked again: "What are those names of Narayana?" sa hovaca hiraNyagarbhah | Tr: Lord Brahma said: hare rAma hare rAma rAma rAma hare hare | Tr: O Hari, O Rama, O Hari, O Rama , O Rama O Rama, O Hari, O Hari! hare kRShNa hare kRShNa kRShNa kRShNa hare hare | Tr: O Hari, O Krishna, O Hari, O Krishna , O Krishna O Krishna, O Hari, O Hari! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.