"It`s correct to call Chaitanya Krishna"

[melvin]

When a great personality passes away,

we almost always praise to the hea-

vens his exceptional traits and the

great contributions he made, whether

in theology, arts and sciences, as

an ambassador of peace, for the good

of man, but not actually having dis-

cussed what kind of life he lived

while he was still struggling to have

his dream become a reality.

Yes, correct me if I`m wrong, if I

say that Lord Chaitanya is Krishna.

Just like calling Jesus is Christ.But

while both were still with us 2,001

and 515 years ago, only a few have

really considered Jesus and Chaitanya

to be GodThemselves. In fact, many

called them names. Example, " King of

the Jews", etc.

If only Swamiji were alive today, I`d

never hesitate calling Lord Abhay to

be Lord Chaitanya Himself even if he

covers his ears and not wanting to

hear any of it. Well, it`s better late

than never to tell His Divine Grace

A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami that he is

no other than Lord Mahaprabhu Himself.

 

Please forgive me for being such a sen-

timental fool.

[Tarun]

Vaisnavas are interested in relationships,

not in becoming one another.

Vaisnavas conquer ViSNu with love, not by merging.

Not by crashing into buildings either.

[melvin]

Only God can make a tree,

if it so, then God allows

any machine to crash into

buildings. Who can ques-

tion God`s actions? Isn`t

it God, Vasudeva, is the

cause of all causes? Why

can`t you not understand

this simple fact?