marco Posted November 6, 2001 Report Share Posted November 6, 2001 Krishnaraja is known as the Unconquerable (Ajita) because no Muslim Sultan was able to defeat him when he ruled the Province of Vijayanagara, India in the late 14th cen- tury and early 15th century. There were actually two great Kings who ruled Vijayanagara Province, the last bul- wark of the Indian Hindus, in southern In- dia. These great Rulers were Krishnaraja and Ramaraja. Both of whom were brothers who ruled and protected Vijayanagara from the invasion of Muslim warriors headed by the Sultan of Bihar. The rest of India, however, were already in the hands of other Muslim conquerors who solidified their conquests after taking Bombay and New Delhi. It was only the Province of Vijayanagara, southern India that remained under the Hin- du Rule governed by two brother-Kings, Sri Krishnaraja and Sri Ramaraja. But the defeat and destruction of Vijayana- gara in the hands of the Sultan of Bihar only followed after the departure of Kris- naraja(1525 A.D.) to other lands. It was Ramaraja who took over Krishnaraja`s place but was later defeated, crushed, and ulti- mately beheaded by the Muslims warriors led by the Sultan of Bihar and united by other Islamic tribes when the latter gate-crashed their way into the heart of Vijayanagara. Why Ramaraja lost the Battle at Vijayanagar can be explained because of the absence of his brother-King, Krishnaraja. As to why the Lord left his kingdom can be only ans- wered by a World Historian. If you have no clue to the answer to those questions, then India and Pakistan will forever be a divi- ded nation. Any idea? O.K. You can start with Kashmir. [This message has been edited by marco (edited 11-06-2001).] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mateo Posted November 8, 2001 Report Share Posted November 8, 2001 What happened, Marco, why are you bringing the name of Dr. Melvin? If you want to inform the people about the Hindu reli- gion in this forum, better leave it to Dr. Melvin, who I believe is an authority on this so-called Hindu religion. In fact, during our stay as seminarians, we were informed by our priest-reponsible that its hard to embrace another religion which may not be acceptable if one wants to become a follower of Christ. It`s either you are for this so-called Hindu religion or for Christ, our Lord. So stop this non-sense of embracing, who? Krishna? Krishna is a myth! Awaken your- self and try to spread the Good News. [This message has been edited by mateo (edited 11-08-2001).] [This message has been edited by mateo (edited 11-08-2001).] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naradadeva Posted November 13, 2001 Report Share Posted November 13, 2001 dear Mateo, Krsna is not a myth. He`s exploits are legendary. Dr. Melvin truly is deserving for presenting the history of Krsna and Rama as it is. If you are interested in Krsna consciousness, you may visit the websites dealing with this transcendence. You may send me your message here. And I will correspond accordingly. a servant of His divine grace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gHari Posted November 13, 2001 Report Share Posted November 13, 2001 To the trinity of net-kooks here: You are obviously too dull to hear good advice. Saying that equating Sri Krsna to myth is not challenging only documents your insincerity and dullness. Your alter-egos may cut and paste from Hindu sites and try to fool us, but don't think for a moment that any of your nonsense has anything to do with Christ or the Holy Spirit. Grow up and get serious about your life. Being a follower of Christ is more than just professing it. A tree shall be known by its fruits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gHari Posted November 13, 2001 Report Share Posted November 13, 2001 This raises the question: are all Phillipinos psychotic or do we just have one lonely very sick puppy on our hands here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedley Posted November 13, 2001 Report Share Posted November 13, 2001 I don't think anything Mr. Cosmic MelMarteo says can be trusted including where he claims to be from. This fool reminds me of someone who was kicked off another forum. Originally posted by gHari: This raises the question: are all Phillipinos psychotic or do we just have one lonely very sick puppy on our hands here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 13, 2001 Report Share Posted November 13, 2001 When Portuguese first arrived at India they heard about some islands placed in the far East that the Indians called the land of mad people. So, Portuguese called these islands “Molucas” or “Malucas” meaning crazies or mads. Latter these islands proved to belong to Spain and they were named “Philippines” to honor the King of Spain, Philippe. Indians are very wise people indeed. These islands are the land of crazies! This is a well known fact since ancient times... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedley Posted November 13, 2001 Report Share Posted November 13, 2001 Then perhaps Mr. Cosmic Melmarteo is from the Phillipines or rather from Malucas. Originally posted by Satyaraja dasa: When Portuguese first arrived at India they heard about some islands placed in the far East that the Indians called the land of mad people. So, Portuguese called these islands “Molucas” or “Malucas” meaning crazies or mads. Latter these islands proved to belong to Spain and they were named “Philippines” to honor the King of Spain, Philippe. Indians are very wise people indeed. These islands are the land of crazies! This is a well known fact since ancient times... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naradadeva Posted November 13, 2001 Report Share Posted November 13, 2001 philippines was named after king philip of spain. it used to be part of the sri vijaya majapahit empire ruled by muslim rajas. philippine natives are not flips but are great warriors who came all the way from borneo, sumatra, java,india,ceylon, and other southeast asian territories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 14, 2001 Report Share Posted November 14, 2001 Actually Marco Polo has heard the same story in China, about these islands of mad people. Just consult his adventures and you will see how fit they are to describe this clone from Philippines or Malucas who is posting in these forums. In Portuguese; “As ilhas das pessoas malucas” or “The islands of crazy persons.” Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naradadeva Posted November 14, 2001 Report Share Posted November 14, 2001 mateo krsna is not a myth. please trust me on this because i am your friend but if you thin k krsna isn`t you therefore consult the one whom you consider is the best person to ask t he question if krsna is a myth. he is no othe r than your father, dr. melvin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.