Context.

[kailasa]

According to yoga sutra the word has three components - word, a subject on which it specifies and as possible contexts or internal sense. Thus there is word. His direct value, when a word and subject on which it specifies, coincides. Is contexts, when a word specifying on one subject, has in view of another or context, when one and too word or the rule(situation) can be use in various situations or carry various internal sense.

 

Somewhat almost all spiritual life from the formal point of view is inconsistent, as the Absolute true combines in itself all contradictions. The true combines in itself EVERYTHING, that is formal, from our point of view, be combined can not and consequently the same subject is described repeatedly, what to reach(achieve) his adequate reflection. For example process of creation is described on any other business, as it does not hold in frameworks of formal logic and as such set of categories simultaneously work in creation, the description is given under various corners of perception(recognition) what to reflect a picture more full.

 

At desire in sastra it is possible to find enough contradictions, birth from our imperfect perception(recognition), though, certainly, any contradictions are not present.

 

Precisely as set of rules(situations) of spiritual life in various situations look on any other business. But as is spoken by pure heart will behold true, therefore following obvious rules(situations), the person develops gradually spiritual understanding probably, mixed with non-material emotion.

 

Thus sastra is complete whole and each of her contexts is in complete harmony not looking on can be rare what that external "contradictions".

 

As to the sermon. Is spoken that it is necessary to listen to true from the not concerned authorities. Because in the other case in the completely correct text (citation), we can receive the deformed context. I do not speak even that speaking a word "brahman", the person should or even correctly specify his presence or is at this level. There is certainly set of variants as, when sraddha is accepted for prema, but all this is harmless more less, as the prime target is specified correctly and eventually prema it sraddha in development. There are more worse variants, when sastra is used is not realized - is not realized in the mercenary purposes or in negative variants of the sermon, which can be sometimes useful, but if such sermon occurs is global, the quite guarding fact.

 

For example there is a circuit or it is possible to consider some circuits.

 

The first circuit, is given 3 installations:

 

- " For spiritual life is necessary true guru ". A correct rule.

- " Only blessings the spiritual teacher can be reached success in spiritual life ". A correct rule, but if her all time to do accent only on it, it already becomes a little not adequate, as the complete rule says - guru, sadhu and sastra.

- " Among the spiritual teachers it is necessary to accept uttama adhikari ". A very correct rule. Pay attention that all three rules are correct also all three correspond sastra, but made in a context - " only this concrete spiritual teacher true " (for example) all three rules AT ONCE become are deformed --

 

THE TEXT - " for spiritual life is necessary true guru ".

 

THE CONTEXT - only this concrete spiritual teacher true (not correct installation, you see is set of the true spiritual teachers)

 

THE TEXT - " only blessings of the spiritual teacher is possible to reach success in spiritual life. "

 

CONTEXT - only this spiritual teacher will give the present spiritual life (second wrong rule basing on the first wrong rule).

 

THE TEXT - " among the spiritual teachers is necessary for accepting uttama adhikari. "

 

CONTEXT - this concrete guru it uttama adhikari, (if it so, all in the order with such statement).

 

It is an example of a context. Certainly it not the difficult example.

 

The following circuit -

 

- " For spiritual life is necessary true guru. "

CONTEXT - true guru from set of the spiritual teachers.

 

- " Only blessings the spiritual teacher can be reached success in spiritual life ".

 

CONTEXT - following guru, sadhu and sastra.

 

- " Among the spiritual teachers it is necessary to accept uttama adhikari ".

 

CONTEXT - uttama adhikari it Srila Prabhupada. A correct context, as sadhu and sastra confirm it.

- " The equal attitude(relation) to siksa and diksa guru - secret of success in spiritual life " Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakur.

CONTEXT - following doctrine siksa guru (Srila Prabhupada in this case) we follow for uttama adhikari and as such attitude(relation) to spiritual life corresponds true. This correct on my sight use of the citation.

 

Example not correct use of the same citation -

 

" The equal attitude(relation) to siksa guru and diksa guru - secret of success in spiritual life " a Remarkable rule. But one of possible contexts - " at you is diksa guru, but true siksa you can receive only from us. Come for siksa (citation is applied), but will receive diksa ".

 

It would be desirable to notice, that as the spiritual life is absolute, there can not be two diksa. Understandably that yagya can be and 555, but diksa there can be only one. Siksa there can be a unlimited quantity, but diksa one. There are certainly examples, so strong fidelity, that the schoolboy has received 3 (three!) time diksa at one guru (!!) ))

 

Nevertheless I shall continue.

 

- " Srila Prabhupada pure devotee "

 

CONTEXTS on a choice - 1) " such that guru the unique(sole) true representative Srila Prabhupada " 2) - " it is better to follow doctrine Srila Prabhupada, reading the books Srila Prabhupada, that He and advised "

 

- " AC Bhaktivedanta Swami advises to study the books Goswami "

 

CONTEXTS 1) " Srila Prabhupada had not time(was in time) them to comment " - is not similar on the truth, in 2-3 songs SB Srila Prabhupada writes about certain(determined) eticuette, if with what that the question is stated in parampara, it(he) is not made comments any more, and the links are given and Srila Prabhupada gives them enough, resulting for us all necessary moments.

 

2) " Srila Prabhupada has given initial knowledge, but the present knowledge is stated in works Goswami, which are at us. " Is at all corresponds to that has told Srila Prabhupada. He has told that in His books there is all. Worrying about translations, He at once shortly has translated 10 song as the book about Krisna and Doctrine Sri Caitanya, as most important. Actually if to look the text 10 songs and Krisna book, they practically are identical. As to CC, she was translated completely. All occured at His presence.

 

- " Srila Prabhupada great "

 

CONTEXTS -

1) " I successor of His business and only I know actually that He had in view of, therefore leave all and be betraid to me "

2) " I simply I follow Srila Prabhupada ".

 

The relative spiritual experience will bring the relative comment, where whole will be more less correct, but the details will not coincide. What to speak about the relation.

 

Srila Prabhupada has developed the sermon on all installed and it was made BY HE, it did not do Lord Brahma, though it is doubtless that Lord Brahma has created and installed and has based ours parampara.

Hare Krisna.