Guest guest Posted September 29, 2002 Report Share Posted September 29, 2002 Hooray for Bollywood If the themes of sexual ambiguity mixed with rock and roll and cultural war in Hedwig and the Angry Inch seem a bit over-the-top, you've clearly been sheltered from the eccentricities of India's Bollywood. By Andy Shah Bollywood-the B stands for Bombay, the film capital of India-is brimming with a head-spinning array of silk saris (sometimes on the men), overacting, and the most asinine dance sequences one could ever imagine (picture the Macarena combined with the jive). But I grew up on these films, rented from Indian stores in Los Angeles by my Indian-born parents and avidly watched by our entire stateside extended family, and I love them. And so do millions of others, from New Delhi to Nairobi to next door of wherever you live, making Bollywood the largest film industry in the world. To people reared on Hollywood, it can be difficult to explain the allure of these Bollywood films and their soundtracks (at least eight songs for every film). I guess it's an acquired taste. Of course, some Indian movies actually have plots and good acting, and not all the songs ignore the fine attributes of subtlety and sincerity. Usually, though, three hours of melodrama and the tendency of the characters to burst into song and dance after the significant event of, say, brushing their teeth, is, for the unacquainted, usually followed with a convulsive "What the hell are these people thinking?" I often ask myself the same question but in a different context. "What the hell are these people thinking," I ask, "putting the men in tight faded jeans and body-hugging tank tops and the women in the most ostentatious costumes since Christian Lacroix-and not realizing that their every move screams gay?" I've often fantasized about the day an Indian actor or actress will come out in real life-the day they'd come out in grand, Ellen DeGeneres, "Yep, I'm gay"-style so even my relatives who detest Bollywood films would be talking about it. Someone with enough stature that they won't be relegated thereafter to playing the maniac or having suicidal tendencies. After all, out celebrities and characters often help closeted or questioning folks become more comfortable with their sexualities. I'll even admit that watching Paul Rudd's gay character in the sappy movie The Object of My Affection made me realize that gays can lead normal lives. Oh, what a difference a gay Bollywood star would make! Such an effect they could have on all the questioning youth of South Asia and the Indian diaspora as well as anyone else who watches these supposedly flimsy flicks. It's not just about having someone new to drool over-it's also about knowing that something that is so personal and familiar to me can make room for gays. Though many dismiss Bollywood films, I believe these movies are one element that help confused Indian-American kids like myself solidify their identities. It's something that we watched to feel at least slightly connected with our parents' culture. But, as much as I love them, after watching these films for a while it gets difficult seeing the same hetero lovefest played out over and over again. The main problem, though, is not one of supply but of demand. God knows there appear to be candidates aplenty for the job of Queer Role Model for India (OK, maybe that's asking a bit too much). The new muscle craze among Bollywood actors-started by Salman Khan, who trots around half naked most of the time, and his successor, Hrithik Roshan-screams "Notice me, Chelsea boy!" Then there's Madhuri Dixit, who was rumored among many to be a lesbian for-God forbid-remaining unmarried in her late 20s. She would have been the perfect person to co-opt into the queer domain. Alas, she's married now. But that's the spoiled American in me speaking. It's heartwarming to see the relatively large number of celebrities that come out in America. Of course, it's never enough, but my demands for more are quieted when I realize that there are hardly any out stars in India. I'll spare you the sermon about how Indian culture (there isn't just one, by the way) is like this or that-I'm not qualified, having been born and raised here. What I do know is that many straight Indians still simply refuse to accept that gay Indians exist. Ashok Row Kavi, one of the most influential gay activists in India, says that India maintains a "convenient blind eye towards sexuality of any sort." Though certain aspects of Indian culture are very homosocial-men often hold hands in the street, and the folk dance bhangra is chock-full of near-humping gestures-the actual deed is still denounced. So, Bollywood-I'm just asking for one person. One! Seriously, though, it'll take a movement, a societal shift toward open discussion of queer issues, to make my dream come true. Thankfully, there is a growing openly gay presence in India. Gay organizations and magazines sprout up every day, and there are even a few films that deal with the issue, such as Bombay Boys and BOMgAY. And then maybe one day we'll no longer have only to wish and wonder about that one star who loves to wear tight Levi's and muscle shirts while dancing in flower fields. It'll be clear to everyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theist Posted October 24, 2002 Report Share Posted October 24, 2002 Yeah just what India(or any country)needs is more fag parades, fag movies etc.,to help the youth "solidify their identities" I know what America needs;spearate restrooms for homosexuals. If Bollywood does come out with gay films I hope the populace burns down a couple theaters to stop them from making any more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 25, 2002 Report Share Posted October 25, 2002 this anger and hatred of gay's is a problem for anyone who desires to be a vehicle for the distribution of Mahaprabhus mercy. why be so antagonistic to people solely on the basis of what they like to do sexually ? what good can come of it ? You must relalize some facts, When Srila Prabhupada first came to America,he was living alone in the bowery in manhattan, his very first encounter with americans was with two homosexuals he met on the street who eventually became his first two disciples, got his Gita published,typed it up for him, and basically were his arms and legs when all he had was a typewriter and a room . They are credited with bringing their friends to meet with Srila Prabhupada and became the nucleus for the original temple on 2nd ave. Did Srila Prabhupada treat them as pariahs,did he reject them and treat them like 2nd class citizens ? The truth is that Mahaprabhu saw fit to use them as an example,His mercy goes out to all regardless of their lifestyle or sexual mores, His mercy is not one of prejudice and castigation and attack, it is one of INCLUSION. Attacking the gay community can only hurt you, they are rich ,and powerfull and highly educated in general. As allies they can be your best friend ,ask Srila Prabhupada, as enemies they can only hurt you, so why be antagonistic to them,it is foolish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theist Posted October 25, 2002 Report Share Posted October 25, 2002 Anger & hatred?You take your reading into others thoughts a little too seriously Shiva.I do regard them as pests sometimes.I see their promoting of their lifestyles as counter to a spiritualy progressive civilization. Prabhupada also showed his mercy to meat eatters, drug addicts and promiscuous heterosexuals.He also spoke out against all these habits.I fall under all three headings. Shiva:"Attacking the gay community can only hurt you, they are rich ,and powerfull and highly educated in general. As allies they can be your best friend ,ask Srila Prabhupada, as enemies they can only hurt you, so why be antagonistic to them,it is foolish. My wellbeing depends on Krsna and My own willingness to surrender to Him.No need to kiss faggot ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts