anveshan Posted February 3, 2003 Report Share Posted February 3, 2003 Rama was a great North Indian king. No doubt about that. He came from Ayodhya in those days of no means of transportation, reached upto Lanka and defeated a great king, renowned for his valor,might and bhakti. When her (cousin) sister's beautiful breasts and cute nose were cut into pieces by an indifferent and angry Lakshman. The sister complains to his imperial majesty, Shri. Ravan. Injustice and insult was done to a lady, princess Surpanakha. As a brother and as a just King, Ravan wanted to teach the Rama brothers a lesson. Sita was forcibly taken away, but not raped or force-married. She was given a place, with maids appointed to look after. The generous Ravana even blessed his enemy No. to construct a bridge, knowing well that it is to his peril. The Maryada Purushottam killed another mighty one, Bali, by shooting an arrow, hiding behind a tree. The Purushottam sent a fully pregnant Sita into the forest ( He did not even arrange for some maids or helpers for her) because he did'nt have the courage to face the public. And all he looked for was to protect his "maryada" reputation. Still, the great poet made his Hero a hero. And Ravana a villain. After all, avatars are avatars... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jahnava Nitai Das Posted February 3, 2003 Report Share Posted February 3, 2003 Rama was a great North Indian king. No doubt about that. Actually Ramachandra was parama-purusha bhagavan Himself, the absoute truth, cause of all causes. As Krishna says in the Gita: avajananti mam mudha manushim tanum ashritam param bhavam ajananto mama bhuta-maheshvaram "Fools deride Me when I descend in the human form. They do not know My transcendental nature and My supreme dominion over all that be." It is not possible to understand the science of the Lord's incarnations without proper guidance of a tattva-darshi, or realized saint. Only the saints can allow us to see God as He is, without the covering of our misconceptions: ajnana-timirandhasya jnananjana-shalakaya cakshur unmilitam yena tasmai shri-gurave namah The spiritual master opens our eyes, which are blinded by the darkness of ignorance. He came from Ayodhya in those days of no means of transportation, reached upto Lanka and defeated a great king, renowned for his valor,might and bhakti. 1) If we accept the statements of the Ramayana, they had plenty of methods of transportation, including the Pushpaka Vimana which would fly through the sky. 2) Ravana was not renowned for his bhakti, as bhakti has a particular definition that is not applicable to him: sarvopadhi vinirmuktam tat-paratvena nirmalam hrishikena hrishikesha sevanam bhaktir ucyate. "Being free from all material designations, if one engages all of the senses in the service of the master of the senses, Krishna, it is called bhakti." anyabhilashita-shunyam jnana karmadi anavrtam anukhulyena krishnanu- silanam bhaktir-uttama "The cultivation of activities which are meant exclusively for the pleasure of Sri Krishna, which is not covered by mental speculation, and which is devoid of all desires other than the aspiration to bring happiness to Sri Krishna is called uttama-bhakti, pure devotional service." Ravana envied the supreme Lord, so much so that he wanted to kidnap Bhagavan's wife for his own enjoyment. Bhakti by definition is only applicable to Bhagavan (hrishikena hrishikesha sevanam bhaktir ucyate). By serving Hrishikesha, Bhagavan Sri Krishna, one may perform bhakti. Ravana's worship of other deities was only for fullfiling his material desires. When her (cousin) sister's beautiful breasts and cute nose were cut into pieces by an indifferent and angry Lakshman. This was performed after Suparnakha was going to kill Sita Devi. The sister complains to his imperial majesty, Shri. Ravan. Injustice and insult was done to a lady, princess Surpanakha. It was perfect justice. "In order to remove her rival the rakshasi [suparnakha] jumped to attack Sita and devour her. Rama, realizing the danger, asked Lakshmana to check the demoness and punish her. Lakshmana thereupon cut off the nose and ears of Surpanakha." As a brother and as a just King, Ravan wanted to teach the Rama brothers a lesson. Sita was forcibly taken away, but not raped or force-married. She was given a place, with maids appointed to look after. According to Ramayana Ravana had kidnapped wives from every species of life. He had even kidnapped Agni Deva's wife Swaha. Ravana had ordered Sita Devi to be killed if she refused to become his wife. The only reason he did not try to force her was because he knew he would instantly die due to her vows of chastity. Still, the great poet made his Hero a hero. And Ravana a villain. Ravana and his followers killed and ate Rishis in the forest. It was for this reason that Bhagavan Ramachandra incarnated to destroy this miscreant. The kidnapping of Sita was just an excuse to bring about the end of Ravana and his followers. It would do you well to read the Ramayana once before commenting on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anveshan Posted February 4, 2003 Author Report Share Posted February 4, 2003 Revered Shri Das, First of all, whatever I say is with malice toward none. I have neither any disrespect or respect to some of the philosophies or beliefs you hold so dear to your heart. And you have every right to criticise whatever I believe. And if I am convinced, I will correct myself and say so. Actually you are right when you quoted Shri Bhagwan himself: "ajnana-timirandhasya". As for my being ignorant, I do accept that. So let us believe that Rama was the Ultimate Reality himself, Ravana was a wicked Narabhoji who lived on rishies and munies. But you said: ====================================================== "It would do you well to read the Ramayana once before commenting on it." ======================================================= Here I may state that by age of 9, the entire Sundara Kandam of the great Ramanujan Ezhutthachhan was by heart to me. And I am genetically a Vaishnava, a great one at that! My grand father happened to be Vishnu, father Narayana and myself Srihari! But I think now that some genetic mutation did occur during or after my birth. Hence my prakruti has changed. Here I tell you all the (real) story of my wife. She visits every temple and prays. To the famous(and ancient) Bhairava temple she goes with a bottle of rum(because the army rationed rum she gets cheaper than the whisky and the lord will not get a hang over as army quality is certified). And brings back the ' prasad' in a bottle. Varanasi or Vaishnodevi, Manasa Devi, Chamundeswari or Kamakhya.. Everywhere she goes with equal zeal. If she comes across a banyan tree she will give it a pious salute, she prays to the great tulasi plant at least two times a day. She visits the famous Hare Krishna temple at Kailas(Delhi), says Hare Rama Hare Krishna, to the Sai twins - Sirdi and Puttapparthi- and chants "Jai jagdeesha hare, Om Saisha Hare" And if you place an idol of a frog in front of her and you, being a swami, tells her that this is one of the avataras of the great lord, she will sing, innocently, " Jaya Mandookesha Hare" At times I used to laugh at her. But ultimately, she is right, I think. IT is everywhere. Regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2003 Report Share Posted February 4, 2003 anveshan, is the sum of your birth date = 6/7 ? you may choose to answer or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2003 Report Share Posted February 4, 2003 Dear Shri Ram, In this regard, a great mis happening occured. My time, date and nakshatra and all was dutifully noted by parents or grand parents. But all was according to the local(South Indian) Calender. Later, when I joined school, it was 'converted'into English. Which version is technically correct, I do not know. By the local version the sum total is five and the angala version it is six. Which one I should follow? The anveshanam continues...! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 4, 2003 Report Share Posted February 4, 2003 anveshanam, i would think it is 6 numerologically as most numerological software/calculations use this calendar. this also seemed to match my estimate. but if you have a well laid out horscope that should be used for serious predictions. does your current door number add to 5, a number like 113 ? of course, if you have letters like B in your door number it is all the more complicated for you to convert it to its numerlogical equivalent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sushil_kanoria Posted February 5, 2003 Report Share Posted February 5, 2003 Hari Bol Ramji, Are you an Astrologist or Numerologist ?? Hari Bol, Sushil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.