anadi Posted March 28, 2003 Report Share Posted March 28, 2003 All wrong, gopas are in madhurya rasa, she needs to read the <font color="blue"> plays of Rupa goswami</font color> , there the rasa is shown between <font color="green"> the gopis(all expansions of Radha) and the gopas.</font color> They are <font color="green"> engaged in maduryha rasa </font color> together,no one is excluded. the reality is that the <font color="blue"> gopis are enjoying madhurya rasa with the gopas</font color> , <font color="red"> Krishna is not sufficient for them</font color> . To read books like Lalita Madhava , Vidagda Madhava, or Ujivala Nilamani, is good, when one is qualified to do it. Let us see what says Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura in Jaiva Dharma about Madhura rasa, and the gopas. Gosvami: Madhura-rasa has been called mukhya rati. A living entity has taken shelter of the material rasas but when he become devoted to the Supreme Lord he may thus gradually turn from the things of the material world and thus attain renunciation. A person who is not renounced in this way <font color="blue"> is not qualified to understand the spiritual rasas</font color> . Therefore the people in general are not qualified to understand the madhura-rasa. Madhura-rasa is very difficult to understand. It is not easy to find a person qualified to understand it. This rasa is very confidential. Therefore it is appropriate to keep it hidden from general view. Therefore, even though many things could be said about madhura-rasa, I will describe it only briefly. Vrajanatha: O master, I am <font color="blue"> a follower of the cowherd boy Sri Subala</font color> . Please <font color="blue"> consider what I am qualified to hear</font color> , and tell me only that much. Gosvami: The priya-narma-sakha friends of Krsna are to <font color="blue"> a certain extent aware</font color> of the activities of madhura-rasa. Taking this into consideration, I will tell you what is right for you to hear, and I will not tell you what is not appropriate for you to hear. Vrajanatha: What are the alambanas of this rasa? Gosvami: In this rasa the <font color="blue"> visaya (the object of love)</font color> is Sri Krsna, the hero whose handsomeness has no equal. The transcendental <font color="green"> asraya (container of love)</font color> is the devotees who relish pastimes with Him. <font color="blue"> Therefore the vraja-gopis are the asraya</font color> in this rasa. Of all the dear gopis, Sri Radha is the best. the gopis are enjoying madhurya rasa with the gopas : In this rasa the visaya (the object of love) is Sri Krsna the vraja-gopis are the asraya in this rasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2003 Report Share Posted March 28, 2003 again, here clearly madhurya rasa is described as hidden, confidential, not understood by those who are not qualified, why ? because what is written ,is not to be taken literally, but again , this is what you are doing, insisting on the literal interpretation of rasa shastra, at the same time quoting Bhaktivinode not to do that ? for instance, i will try and help you, "in this rasa the visaya(the object of love) is Krishna, the hero whose handsomeness has no equal. The transcendental asraya(container of love)is the devotees who relish pastimes with him. Therefore the vraja-gopis are the asraya in this rasa.Of all the dear gopis,Sri Radha is the best. "In this rasa" , here he is refering to the gopas. "the vraja-gopis are the asraya in this rasa." So what does that have to do with the gopas? Krishna is a gopa, he is described as the visaya, the object of love, the gopis are containers of love,asraya, that love is directed at the gopas,which Krishna is one. He states "in this rasa", explaining what is the gopas position in relation to madhurya rasa. He then states that the gopis are containers of love, directing their love to the object of their love, among those gopis Radha is the best. so this is all very confidential, not understood without sufficient education . One must understand first that Radha,Krishna, and the Gopis, are all one and the same supreme person,in various guises. without that basic understanding you cannot understand madhurya lila ,the confidential nature will be hidden and you will not understand Why the gopas are important. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anadi Posted March 28, 2003 Author Report Share Posted March 28, 2003 Not of Krsna, but of the friends of Krsna. And don't come again please with we are all Krsna. Vrajanatha: O master, I am a follower of the cowherd boy Sri Subala . Please consider what I am qualified to hear , and tell me only that much. Gosvami: The priya-narma-sakha friends of Krsna are to a certain extent aware of the activities of madhura-rasa. Taking this into consideration, I will tell you what is right for you to hear, and I will not tell you what is not appropriate for you to hear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 28, 2003 Report Share Posted March 28, 2003 i cannot understand your meaning in your first sentence, can you elucidate. How can rasa be present between only one person in various guises ? how can god have rasa with him/her self ? another thing, i didn't say we are all Krishna, where do you get that ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enlightened Posted March 29, 2003 Report Share Posted March 29, 2003 Krishna is not like you and me, he is transcendental. So, he is you, me and every one, but we are not him. I think what he is trying to say is, what ever is said about this rasa is revealing only one thing, that is love. You can gain the God by love and love alone.Now What you are trying to say "shiva" is what the other guy "anandi" is saying. You just don't see that you are saying the same thing. :-) the only difference is that : One is quoting from a book, the other is trying to come across by using his own words. :-D i enjoy this forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anadi Posted April 4, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 4, 2003 Madhura Rasa (parakya naykas) from Jaiva Dharma If Krsna is the supreme substance and sakti (energy) and saktiman (the posessor of energy) are non different, even if sakti becomes separated from saktiman, how can sakti be called parodha (marrided to a gopa other than Krsna ) and Krsna be called upapati (paramour)? (Gosvami:) Baba Vijaya, Krsna is fully independent in all activities, and His unimpeded desires are not dependent on the desires of others. His eternal desire is that His aisvarya (majesty and opulence) should be concealed and His madhurya (sweetness) should be manifested. Accordingly, He assigns to His sakti an existence separate from Himself, (but connected through bhakti rasa). Consequently His para sakti, (whose embodiment is Srimati Radhika), assumes the form of millions of attractive young gopis, all endeavorig to render Him various services. Still Krsna is not fully satisfied by His sakti's service while it is influenced by knowledge of His aisvarya. Therefore by the influence of His yogamaya sakti, He provides those beautiful gopis with the abhiman (self conception) that they belong to separate households. That is to say, through the influence of that sakti (yoga maya), they consider themselves the wives of others, and simultaneously, Krsna assumes the relationship as their upapati (paramour). Out of lobha (greed) for parakiya rasa, Krsna transcends His atmarama dharma (self satisfied nature) and performs varieties of wonderful lilas, such as rasa lila, with those young gopis who implicitly believe that they are married to others. all glories to sri guru and gaura Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2003 Report Share Posted April 4, 2003 nice , here we have the essence of your misunderstanding spelled out clearly, i hope ? we are told in your quote that the sakti and the saktiman are all non different, that means the same. and then we are told that Radha assumes the forms of millions of gopis, all non different then Radha. then we are told that Krishna is not satisfied by those gopis, becuse of their knowledge. what is that knowledge ? well, since they are all non different then Krishna, all being expansions of his sakti, they are Krishna, and therefore cannot see Krishna as being non different then themselves, they cannot hide from the truth of their position as all being the same exact person in different garbs. so then you quote that he gives his saktis(female selves) the self conception that they are married to others, the gopas. this is all important to understand, here we see that Krishna cannot satisfy himself in a relationship with himself as his own saktis or expansions as female gopis, here we are told it is of NECESSITY that the gopis MUST have the self conception of belonging to OTHER then Krishna, to the gopas. Why ? As it is stated the gopis cannot satisfy Krishna because they are all fully aware that they are in fact non different,saktis of Krishna. And then they have pastimes with Krishna as their paramour. if taken literally you will not make sense of this. the gopis cannot satisfy Krishna unless they are married to gopas, then they can satisfy Krishna, this is the message we need to understand. Krishna is the gopis,Krishna is satisfied not directly by the gopis service to him but ONLY when they are married to the gopas, then Krishna is satisfied, WHY ? Because Krishna is the gopis, and they are hladini sakti, the pleasure potency, through them Krishna is enjoying madhurya rasa, not with them, through them, by marrying the gopas, and by this marrying the gopas the gopis self conception is now the proper one, and Krishna can enjoy through their self conception of being married to the gopas. Do not make the mistake of taking what Jaiva dharma is saying the wrong way, the gopis cannot satisfy Krishna directly, they must be married to the gopas, then Krishna is satisfied, not by enjoying the gopis, but enjoying AS the gopis, while in Vraja the truth is not seen by all, and Krishna may indeed be consorting with the gopis, to the outside observer as ourselves we can see the inner truth, the pastimes of love in Vraja are being enjoyed at the highest level by Krishna as the gopis, with the gopas, and their rasa with Krishna directly is for show, they can never satisfy Krishna directly, because they are non different from him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anadi Posted April 4, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 4, 2003 Madhura rasa Parakya Naykas (Jaiva Dharma) In all these activities, His Vamsi is his priya friend. In this way the parakiya-rasa is eternally perfect in the realm of Goloka. It is for this purpose ( <font color="blue"> of tasting the patimes of being loved <font color="red"> as the only object of love (visaya)</font color> in a paramour mood</font color> and reciprocate that love) that the pastime forests of Goloka and Vrndavana exist. Vraja's rasa-mandala, Yamuna shore, Govardhana Hill, and other pastimes places all exist in Goloka also. Pure svakiya rasa is splendidly manifested in Vaikuntha. Svakiya rasa and parakiya rasa, which are simultaneously one and different from each other, are both seen in Goloka. Look. This is very wonderful. Although the parakiya-rasa in Vraja seems to be material and Krsna seems to be an ordinary paramour, the truth is that it is not material and Krsna is not a paramour at all, <font color="red"> Krsna has been enjoying </font color> the <font color="blue"> company of His potencies </font color> from<font color="blue"> a time without beginning. </font color> (still the gopis are not married to krsna, and they have the conception (abhiman) of beeing married to others, and that gives more loving tension to the relation). Their relationship is actually <font color="green"> the perfection of svakiya-rasa, of the love of a husband and wife</font color> . That His potencies are married to others and Krsna is their paramour is only an idea created to nourish the bliss of Their pastimes in Vraja. In Gokula, gopas such Abhimanyu are special avataras of the conception that the gopis are marriend. They become husbands to nourish Krsna's lila and to make Him <font color="red"> the leader of vilasa </font color> (pastimes) on the stage of Vraja <font color="red"> in the mood of upapati</font color> paramour. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2003 Report Share Posted April 4, 2003 here it is stated "Krishna as their paramour is only an idea created to nourish the bliss of the pastimes" how many times have i stated that ?,over and over, and over. also i quote "Krishna is not a paramour at all" this is the essence of vraja lila, krishna is really performing his pastimes for the benefit of lila, the real rasa is not between krishna and himself or herself, that is not possible, and never will be. the real rasa is between the gopas and gopis, krishna as paramour is not real,it appears that way externally, but the inner reality is that it is not possible,desirable, or real on the inner plane. this is why you cannot undestand the rasa shastra without guidance from the experienced person, otherwise you will misunderstand everything. you will see what is being said backwards, you will see the rasa between the gopis and gopas as being illusory, and the rasa between the gopis and Krishna as being real, even though we are repeatedly told that they are the same person. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anadi Posted April 4, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 4, 2003 the real rasa is between the gopas and gopis, <font color="blue"> Gopas and gopis are asraya tattva,</font color> they are both <font color="blue"> containers of love.</font color> Rasa cannot take place between asraya tattva and ashraya tattva. This is one of the illusion in the material world, than in rasa jiva is asraya tattva. Two jiva cannot have real rasa. There is no real object of love (visaya tattva). Rasa <font color="red"> exists only between </font color> <font color="red"> visaya tattva (the only object of love) Sri krsna</font color> and asraya tattva <font color="blue"> (the containers of love) Srimati Radhika</font color> (para sakti and all Her infinite expansions) the real rasa is not between krishna and himself or herself, that is not possible, and never will be. Krsnera tatastha sakti bheda abheda prakash the tatasth energy Krsna's (and any other energy) is at the same time one with Krsna <font color="blue"> and different</font color> . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2003 Report Share Posted April 4, 2003 this is the result of not taking guidance from authorized sources. you state the foolishness of unreason as being the truth and the real and reasonable as being impossible. you state that rasa can only exist between radha and krishna, that is the exact opposite of reason, Radha and Krishna are the same person, rasa between them is impossible, and only appears to be real as you have quoted from jaiva dharma, for the benefit of lila. It take two to tango, this simple and obvious truth is lost on you, you take what is impossible as absolute reality, and take reality as unreality. gopis are not jivas, gopas are jivas, gopis are all expansions of Radha, we are not, we are expansions of tatashta sakti, not hladini sakti as are all the gopis. this is another of your misconceptions, the rasa is between jiva and bhagavan, not between bhagavan and bhagavan, there is only ONE bhagavan, one god, rasa is between two people not between different guises of one person. due to being contaminated by such impersonal conceptions you cannot see the obvious truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anadi Posted April 4, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 4, 2003 <font color="blue"> Radha and Krishna</font color> are the same person, rasa between them is impossible the <font color="blue"> rasa is between jiva and bhagavan, not between bhagavan and bhagavan</font color> , there is only ONE bhagavan Radha is not Bhagavan tattva, Sie is para shakti or svarupa sakti of bhagavan, or hladini shakti. Bhagavan is shaktimator, the posessor of energy. These two tattvas are distinct and yet they are also eternally and in all respects inseparable. Mortal man cannot realise the confidential relatioship between sakti and saktiman, because their thoughts are always limited. Actually although the factual substance and the potential energy of the substance are different, they are also indivisible, meaning that they are non different. This difference and non difference is established at one and the same time. Therefore Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu and His followers, the Gaudiya Vaisnavas, have accepted the relationship of acintya bhedaabheda (inconceivable oneness and difference) between the factual substance and the potential energy of the substance. In his Sandarbhas Srila Jiva Gosvami has used scriptural evidence and incontrovertible reasoning to prove the acintya bhedaabheda relationship between potnet and the potency. Srimati RAdhikaji is the complete energy and Krsna is the complete energetic source. RAdha-Krsna are inherently nondifferent in just the same way that the musk and its fragrance, or fire and heat cannot be separated from each other. Radha krsna are manifst in two forms just to taste the rasa of <font color="red"> Their </font color> pastimes. radha purna sakti , krsna purna saktiman dui vastubheda nahi, sastra paramana mrigamada tara gandha yaiche avicched agni jvalate yaiche kabhu nahi bheda radha krsna aiche sada eka i svarupa lila rasa asvadita dhare dui rupa Sri Radha is the full potency ond Sri Krsna is the possessor of the full potency. All the revealed scriptures prove that these two are non different. They are indeed the same just as musk and its scent are inseparable, or the fire and its heat are inseparable. Thus <font color="red"> Sri Radha and Sri Krsna </font color> are One, yet They <font color="red"> have taken two forms to enjoy the mellows of pastimes.</font color> From Krsna come all the saktiman expansions. From Radhika come alle the sakti expansions. In Vraja all their expansions are preocupied to help to enhance and embelish Their yugala milan. Here Their rasa is melting all. jaya jaya radha krsna yugala milana arati koye laitadi sakhi gana sri radha madhava . sarasija ashe bhakativinada sakhi pade sukhe bhase Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2003 Report Share Posted April 4, 2003 exactamundo ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2003 Report Share Posted April 4, 2003 the conception that you have been trying to impart is polythesim and impersonalism rolled into one. Stating that Krishna and Radha are only interested in themselves and their personal expansions, and not other people. and stating that Krishna and Radha and the gopis are somehow seperate being, distinct entities, different gods, when in fact they are all aspects of One person, one conscious being,in many guises. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2003 Report Share Posted April 4, 2003 whereas the jivas are not like them, we are tatashta sakti, one with but distinct from. The gopis and radha and Krishna are not like that, they are all part of the same supreme personality of godhead, male and female expansions not jivas,not distinct in essence,only in appearence. Radha is hladini sakti,gopis are her personal expansions, Krishna is saktiman,Balarama and other are his personal expansions, all the one supreme being. jivas are not that, we are one with, but DISTINCT, we are not personal hladini expansions, we are marginal potency, individual parts,not complete expansions of the whole, partial expansions with distinct identity, not so with the gopis or radha, they are identical with Krishna, not marginal dependent entities, they are all fully god. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anadi Posted April 4, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 4, 2003 Radha is not Bhagavan tattva, Sie is para shakti or svarupa sakti of bhagavan, or hladini shakti. Bhagavan is shaktimator, the posessor of energy. These two tattvas are distinct and yet they are also eternally and in all respects inseparable. Mortal man cannot realise the confidential relatioship between sakti and saktiman, because their thoughts are always limited. Actually although the factual substance and the potential energy of the substance are different, they are also indivisible, meaning that they are non different. This difference and non difference is established at one and the same time. Therefore Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu and His followers, the Gaudiya Vaisnavas, have accepted the relationship of acintya bhedaabheda (inconceivable oneness and difference) between the factual substance and the potential energy of the substance. In his Sandarbhas Srila Jiva Gosvami has used scriptural evidence and incontrovertible reasoning to prove the acintya bhedaabheda relationship between potnet and the potency. Srimati RAdhikaji is the complete energy and Krsna is the complete energetic source. RAdha-Krsna are inherently nondifferent in just the same way that the musk and its fragrance, or fire and heat cannot be separated from each other. Radha krsna are manifst in two forms just to taste the rasa of Their pastimes. radha purna sakti , krsna purna saktiman dui vastubheda nahi, sastra paramana mrigamada tara gandha yaiche avicched agni jvalate yaiche kabhu nahi bheda radha krsna aiche sada eka i svarupa lila rasa asvadita dhare dui rupa Sri Radha is the full potency ond Sri Krsna is the possessor of the full potency. All the revealed scriptures prove that these two are non different. They are indeed the same just as musk and its scent are inseparable, or the fire and its heat are inseparable. Thus Sri Radha and Sri Krsna are One, yet They have taken two forms to enjoy the mellows of pastimes. From Krsna come all the saktiman expansions. From Radhika come alle the sakti expansions. In Vraja all their expansions are preocupied to help to enhance and embelish Their yugala milan. Here Their rasa is melting all. jaya jaya radha krsna yugala milana arati koye laitadi sakhi gana sri radha madhava . sarasija ashe bhakativinada sakhi pade sukhe bhase Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2003 Report Share Posted April 4, 2003 this is your bogus conception,period. It is stated i think in Caitanya Caritamrta "the one supreme person has become two" and those two have joined together again as Sri caitanya" that is reality. anything that deviates from that, is bogus. your bogus concept misunderstands simple,basic truths, "Radha and Krishna are one and the same never make the mistake of thinking otherwise." Intro C.C.Bhaktivedanta. swami when you make this mistaken conclusion you create a polytheistic dogma that is the antithesis of gaudiya siddhanta and vedic dharma in general. Radha is the supreme female personality of godhead, she is fully god, as is Krishna. when you accept deviant siddhanta, you make illogical and impossible assumptions concerning rasa, and lila. Radha and Krishna are one,in two forms, not two in two forms,one person,two forms. rasa is only possible between two people, the secret rasa tattva you allude to is this fact, your interpretation is illogical wrong, due to taking literally and prematurely explanations from unauthorized sources, the result ? you make what is obvious seem very far away, Radha and Krishna lila , and rasa shastra and the understanding that is true is simple,sweet and logical. your explanation is illogical and unsupportable by reason, and you try and explain away the glaring inconsistancies with " the truth is unknowable and secret" yes, for you . you say Radha is not bhagavan tattva. that is the beginning of your unfortunate display of psuedo siddhanta,and it is all downhill from there. Radha and Krishna are eternally one,and have also seperated eternally for pastimes. Not,Radha and Krishna are eternally one and different not achintya bhedabheda tattva, that is something else. Radha and Krishna are not one and different like the jiva and bhagavan, they are fully one and the same, the only difference is in their bodily forms and in the personalities they display, the gopis also are all fully one,and different only in form and personality displayed. god is not male, with a female underling, god has created male and female forms, the form for enjoyment,hladini sakti is Radha and the gopis. your conception is polytheism, millions of gods, since the gopis are all expansions of radha. the truth is much simpler,do not confuse facts, with incoherent interpretatons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anadi Posted April 5, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 Dear "enlightned" prabhu, To talk about the gopis means to talk about their relation not only to Krsna but also to Srimati Radharani, because the gopis are in madhurya rasa, and madhurya rasa is directly nourished by Srimati Radharani. As we talked about the gopas, we saw that all have as their staiybhava, (the steady loving sentiment (priti) accompanying their actions), the sakhya rasa (frendship). toward the only object of their love (visaya tattva) Sri brajendra nandan krsna. Not even the <font color="blue"> pryanarma sakhas</font color> like Subala and MadhuMangal (which are <font color="blue"> nitya parikars </font color> of brajendra nandan krsna) have other love than that of sakhya rasa directed to Sri brajendra nandan krsna and no one else. They may participate in the arrangements of the meetings of the divine couple Hare Krsna, but they are not <font color="red"> in madhurya rasa with the gopis</font color> . <font color="blue"> The jewel of the madhurya rasa</font color> is the rasa dance, and Krsna is the only one who does rasa dance with the gopis. In prakat lila also Balarama, when he becomes Dhauji like Krsna, on a special occasion does rasa dance with certain gopis on behalf of Krsna. If somebody has statements from the sastra where is being said that the gopas and the gopis have a relation of madhurya rasa, and doing rasa together on behalf of the divine couple, please provide them so that my one part of the many anarthas (unwanted things in the heart) in the form of this svarup brahm- para tattva brahm(illusion about spiritual identity of the Supreme Truth) should be removed. Your unqualified servant anadi krsna dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2003 Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 “It is not that Radharani is separate from Krishna. Radharani is also Krishna, for there is no difference between the energy and the energetic. Without energy, there is no meaning to the energetic, and without the energetic there is no meaning to the energy. Similarly, without Radha there is no meaning to Krishna and without Krishna there is no meaning to Radha. Because of this, the Vaisnava philosophy first of all pays obeisances to and worships the internal pleasure potency of the Supreme Lord. Thus the Lord and His potency are always referred to as Radha-Krishna. Similarly those who worship Narayana first utter the name of Laksmi, as Laksmi-Narayana. Similarly those who worship Lord Rama first utter the name of Sita. In any case – Sita-Rama, Radha-Krishna, Laksmi-Narayana – the potency always comes first. “Radha and Krishna are one, and when Krishna desires to enjoy pleasure, He manifests Himself as Radharani. The spiritual exchange of love between Radha and Krishna is the actual display of the internal pleasure potency of Krishna.” (From the Introduction to the Sri by His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada) radha-krsna pranaya-vikrtir hladini saktir asmad ekatmanau api bhuvipura deha-bhedam gatau tau caitanyakhyam prakatam adhuna tad-dvayam caikyam aptam radha-bhava-dyuti-suvalitam naumi krsna-svarupam "The loving affairs of Radha Krishna are transcendental manifestations of the Lord's internal pleasure-giving potency. Although Radha and Krishna are one in Their identity, They have separated Themselves eternally. Now these two transcendental identities have again united in the form of Sri Krishna Caitanya. I bow down to Him, who has manifested Himself with the sentiment and complexion of Srimati Radharani although He is Krishna Himself." (C.c. Adi 1.1.5) Krishna says: acaryam mam vijaniyan "One should know the acarya (guru) as Myself." (Bhag. 11.17.27) This verse although generally taken literally to mean that the guru is nondifferent from Krishna also indicates that the guru is nondifferent than Srimati Radharani. Indeed the very 'Self' of Sri Krishna is Srimati Radharani. swami B.G. Narasingha "Please hear, O Narada, and I will tell you the meaning of these mantras. The material world is manifested by the Lord's maya potency and other external potencies. The spiritual world is manifested by the Lord's chit potency and other internal and everlasting spiritual potencies. The protector of these potencies is said to be the gopi Sri Radha, who is Lord Krishna's beloved. The transcendental goddess Sri Radha is the direct counterpart of Lord Sri Krishna. She is the central figure for all the goddesses of fortune. She is the pleasure potency of Lord Krishna. The wise say that She is the pleasure potency of Lord Krishna. Durga and the other goddesses in the world of the three modes are a million-millionth part of one of Her expansions. She is directly Goddess Maha-Lakshmi and Lord Krishna is Lord Narayana. O best of sages, there is not the slightest difference between Them. O best of sages, what more can I say? Nothing can exist without them. This universe made of spirit and matter together is Their potency. She is Durga and Lord Hari is Shiva. Lord Krishna is Indra and She is Shachi. She is Savitri and Lord Hari is Brahma. She is Dhumorna and Lord Hari is Yama. O Narada, please know that everything is Their potency. Even if I had many hundreds of years, I could not describe all Their glories." Sanatkumara-samhita (skanda purana,Sadasiva answering Narada's questions) "O Krishna, I am Radha, who stays on Your chest during the rasa dance in Vrindavan forest." Thus from Durga-devi's words we can understand that the Lord does not have two potencies. There is only one potency, who manifests Herself as the spiritual potency Radhika and the material potency Visnu-maya. When the potency is free from the material modes, she is called the spiritual potency, and when she is within the sphere of the material modes, she is called the material potency. jaiva dharma Bhaktivinode Thakur Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2003 Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 without understanding that god is one person, not two or many, you cannot understand rasa lila or rasa shastra. above we see Bhaktivinode explaining that god has ONE potency or energy, that is Radhika, everything else is a manifestation from her. without understanding the supremacy of Radha, and her oneness with Krishna and the gopis, then you cannot understand what is her desire. rasa can only be between different people, rasa cannot exist between one person and her different extensions in various guises, that is for the benefit of lila, and not the inner truth of rasa lila, the inner truth is revealed not by the literal words of rasa shastra, there radha and krishna and the gopis are spoken of in the vision of those who do not see that they are all one person, only when your vision is perfected and not in the illusion of maha maya or yoga maya, is the true nature of rasa lila revealed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2003 Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 and as far as the gopas and gopis are concerned, Rupa Goswami has given us his plays, in them the gopas and gopis, headed by Krishna and Radha's closest girl friends, we find the madhurya lila, not just between the gopis and Krishna, between the gopis and the gopas also. this is the whole point of rasa lila, rasa between the jiva and god, percieved rasa between god and her extensions is for the benefit of that lila, the real rasa is between Radha's extensions and the gopas, they are engaged in pastimes ,and we are given a hint of that lila by Rupa goswami. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2003 Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 that is the most confidential knowledge, the mystery of rasa lila, this is not directly spoken of in rasa shastra, it is hidden , and this is why the truth is described as unavailable to the unqualified. when one has sufficient knowledge, then the truth is revealed, it has to be understood step by step, Sri Caitanyas lila is the entrance to this highest understanding, He is Radha and Krishna combined, yet he shows us that the dominant mood he has is that of Radha, this is the basic truth necessary to understand. What is rasa ? it is relationship , that means it takes 2 people, one cannot have rasa with himself. this is needed to be understood, then all else will be revealed through the rasa shastra, not literally, but in the way it is intended to be understood. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 5, 2003 Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 radha-krsna pranaya-vikrtir hladini saktir asmad ekatmanau api bhuvipura deha-bhedam gatau tau caitanyakhyam prakatam adhuna tad-dvayam caikyam aptam radha-bhava-dyuti-suvalitam naumi krsna-svarupam "The loving affairs of Radha Krishna are transcendental manifestations of the Lord's internal pleasure-giving potency. Although Radha and Krishna are one in Their identity, They have separated Themselves eternally. Now these two transcendental identities have again united in the form of Sri Krishna Caitanya. I bow down to Him, who has manifested Himself with the sentiment and complexion of Srimati Radharani although He is Krishna Himself." (C.c. Adi 1.1.5) your unqualified servant anadi krsna dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anadi Posted April 5, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 radha-krsna pranaya-vikrtir hladini saktir asmad ekatmanau api bhuvipura deha-bhedam gatau tau caitanyakhyam prakatam adhuna tad-dvayam caikyam aptam radha-bhava-dyuti-suvalitam naumi krsna-svarupam "The loving affairs of Radha Krishna are transcendental manifestations of the Lord's internal pleasure-giving potency. Although Radha and Krishna <font color="blue"> are one in Their identity</font color> , They have <font color="red"> separated Themselves eternally</font color> . Now these two transcendental identities have again united in the form of Sri Krishna Caitanya. I bow down to Him, who has manifested Himself with the sentiment and complexion of Srimati Radharani <font color="red"> although He is Krishna Himself</font color> ." (C.c. Adi 1.1.5) your unqualified servant anadi krsna dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anadi Posted April 5, 2003 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2003 What is rasa ? it is relationship , that means it takes <font color="red"> 2 "people"</font color> , one cannot have rasa with himself. "The loving affairs of Radha Krishna are transcendental manifestations of the Lord's internal pleasure-giving potency. Although Radha and Krishna are one in Their identity , <font color="red"> They have separated Themselves eternally . </font color> What is rasa ? it is relationship , that means it takes <font color="red"> 2 "people"</font color> , one cannot have rasa with himself. Rasa is not between 2 people (only rasa abhasa in the jada jagat) Transcendental rasa is between <font color="blue"> vishaya tattva </font color> the object of love - bhagavan and <font color="red"> ashraya tattva </font color> the container of love - his shaktis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.