coalition fraud

[mahak]

Haribol. Didyall hear of the great christian conversion of iraq underway now? Well, get ready, because Bush aint nothin but an arm of the fanatical fundamentalism with the western twist that has scourged the world.

 

The marines have handouts asking for them to pray for the president. Dontya think it should be the other way around, but then I guess, the good servicemen could do well without the ritualistic and bloody worship performed by the likes of the Christian Coalition.

 

This destruction of iraq reeks of the "manifest destiny" doctrine of the fanatics claiming christ as their lord (even though He says "get away from me, workers of iniquity, for I know ye not"). Destroy their muslim culture, destroy their historical bearings (which is far greater than islam, judah and christianity combined) by allowing the destruction of akkadian artifacts and writings, then send in the missionaries to "save" the slaves. Reeks, and those who cannot see bush as the ayatollah of the west, the military arm of the christian coalition of lots of known right-wing-extremist evangelicals, well, I must admit that the plan is ingenious.

 

As a witness and non-participant, I am impressed at the rapidity of the dissolution of the constition, the utter control of the media, the crushing of all dissent under the official black operation, known for 35 years as the "ploicy of ridicule".

 

Nixon was able to stop the age of aquarius. Easy, with the policy of ridicule, he made the 60s movement a one-issue movement, the Vietnam war. End the war, end the movement. Those not in tune would be subject to ridicule.

 

Same true today. Protestesrs are still out there, protesting a war that is not taking place, according to the media. Subject to ridicule.

 

April Glasby? Subject to ridicule if ya bring it up. Bechtel Corporation or Halle Burton? Subject to ridicule if you bring it up. The Christian continuance of Crusades? Subject to ridicule if you bring it up. Just a dope smokin, flag burnin commie whacko.

 

Where are the weapons of massw destruction? Subject to ridicule if you bring it up, because saddam is gone, the iraqis are happy, didnt you see the statue topple, didnt it bring a tear to your eye?

 

What about lying to Congress? I seem to remember an actual impeachment of a president who lied to congress to avoid hurting the feelings of a loved one for an indiscretion, masturbating while a young intern did the same.

 

Well, there is clear evidence that congress was lied to by Bush, that the CIA was coerced into providing congress with forgeries, that Colin Powell was lying to congress and the UNSC about the "real and present danger" Iraq posed to US national security. And these lies were not to protect a loved on from embarassment, these lies were specifically designed to allow the Ayatollah of the West, GWBush, to use his weapon of MASS DESTRUCTION, the us military, to destroy Iraq and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi military and civilians alike, to carry out their fanatic desire to give them christ and take their oil.

 

Face it, folks, this manifest destiny is the scourge of this planet. It is the epitome of racism, sectarian superiority matching master race theories of yesteryear.

 

I dont protest the war because I hate war and killing and all that flowery stuff that is contrary to the rules of this martyaloka (planet of death), I protest the scourge of manifest destiny that wastes the world for the benefit of few, In this philosophy which destroyed the indigenous populations of not only the Americas, but the Pacific Islands, including Austarailia and NZ as well, it is inherant that ethnic cleansing takes place.

 

In other words, dear Iraqi citizens, when Billy Graham's son speaks from the tent and asks you to come up so he can give you jesus, you have free choice, take the gibberish they call "tongues" or walk to the next refugee camp, known as Indian reservations here out west.

 

later, mad mahax

[mahak]

George Bush is a religious fundamentalist who uses the Old Testament to justify his right to attack other countries, according to a veteran British peace campaigner.

 

In an interview with BBC News Online, Bruce Kent - who was head of CND in the 1980s and had to quit a senior post in the Catholic church to pursue his political interests - also said that President Bush believes that Americans are God's chosen people.

 

 

When we meet at his North London home, Kent claims that a future war with Iraq, like the war in Afghanistan and military action in the Balkans, all come back to one basic factor: oil.

 

"The problem with Bush is that yes, he's religious in a fundamentalist sort of way, they read the Old Testament as a sort of charter for the chosen people to do what they like," he said.

 

"You get your security by weapons and too bad if you happen to belong to one of the other tribes - you're going to get walked on.

 

"And it's that kind of thing that horrifies me. I mean the Americans in a funny way see themselves as an ongoing chosen race - it was the Jews and now it's the great American dream."

 

Dangerous people?

 

Kent is keen to stress he is not anti-American - he draws great inspiration from political leaders such as Martin Luther King Junior.

 

That said, he certainly feels a great deal of antipathy to the current White House administration.

 

 

Bush causes Kent massive concern

"I think that the present gang that's got control are really dangerous people," he says.

 

Kent is also infuriated by the US position on Israel - a nation that both has nuclear weapons and has attacked another country, he says.

 

"You're not allowed to say anything about Israel nor are you allowed to say anything about Pakistan ... nor are you allowed to say anything about India and those two countries have been brandishing their weapons at each other."

 

Kent thinks their nuclear weapons deter US interference.

 

"Which may suggest the Americans know Saddam Hussein hasn't yet got them although they may be on the way - heavens above why shouldn't he in a way?

 

"We've got eight or nine countries with nuclear weapons and those countries all say nuclear weapons are essential for security as we do in Britain. What's the moral logic in saying other people can't?"

 

Going nuclear?

 

Kent also feels antipathy towards the current Labour administration in the UK.

 

 

President Reagan's Cruise missiles were a focus of CND

He says he quit the party on the day Tony Blair indicated he would be willing in some circumstances to use Britain's nuclear arsenal.

 

Kent says he cannot work out what the prime minister's motivation is in politics nor does he have much time for the "many absolute clones" on the government benches.

 

"He's making a country that is internally divided: the rich and the poor - the gap's getting wider, people are dispirited, they're disempowered."

 

But Kent says there is little else to vote for either in the Lib Dems or among the Tories - or 'Sons of Thatcher' as he dubs them.

 

The only reason Kent says he retains his optimism is that "change often happens outside parliament so when public opinion has moved sufficiently then politicians tend to follow".

 

Envy

 

The day we meet, news has just broken of Greenpeace activists getting into the grounds of the Sizewell B nuclear power station.

 

Kent admits to being a little envious of the organisation's capacity for getting publicity for their cause.

 

 

Blair has not won Kent's admiration

Of course in the 1980s he was rarely out of the papers. It was the era of Reagan and Thatcher, the Cold War, Greenham Common and Cruise Missiles.

 

So what are the lessons to be drawn from the 1980s in this new era of nuclear brinkmanship?

 

"In the 1980s the real nuclear doctrine and the most dangerous one was first use - that we in some circumstances would be willing to use nuclear weapons in any conflict which had not yet gone nuclear - and that was the point of Cruise missiles, they were there to be used in a conflict that had started.

 

"But now with President Bush in June of 2002 we've gone into a new line which is being echoed by [Defence Secretary] Geoff Hoon and that is that we have a right to pre-emptive action if we judge that we might be under some sort of threat.

 

"In those circumstances we have a right, the Americans have the right, to use anything in the arsenal which must include nuclear weapons, and that's a completely new development and a very dangerous one."

 

Abolishing war?

 

Kent remains just as busy as he was in the 1980s still traipsing up and down the country to talk to different groups of peace activists.

 

He has also founded an organisation called the Movement for the Abolition of War "to get people to realise that war is not an essential part of civilisation".

 

Kent says if Germany and France - which had three wars in under a century - can come to such a binding peace as they have today there is hope for the rest of the world.

 

It is clear that he believes the biggest barrier to the abolition of war is a belief in what he sees as a distorted version of the American dream.

 

"We run everything and if you don't like what we're doing we are going to bop you with something," is the way Kent puts it.

 

[Guest guest]

I was right then as now. Wahabes wear different religions, but are the same. exclusive at the point of a gun.

[Guest guest]

Were used. Apocalyptically. The US has used nuclear weapons, spent plutonium, in IRAQ. Iraquis are sick and dying, americans are sick and dying, the die is cast, now the culling (GWB's mission) has begun.

 

haribol, hope yall do okay, ys, mahaksadasa