Guest guest Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 The purpose of this topic is to discuss whether there was family planning in vedic times and if family planning is relevant in modern times. Children increase the bondage between the married couple - the more the merrier. The matajis on this forum should clarify - the women are happier when they have many healthy, wealthy and wise children. Their affection for their husband becomes deeper with each additional child. One of the common wishes that elders bestow upon on newly wed women is "May you be the mother of 100 children". Given today's economic scenario, I dont know if it is a blessing or curse in disguise. In the vedic times, I see that the number of children varied from couple to couple. For example, Janaka had only one daughter, Rama two sons, Nanda had 3 (?), Dasaratha 4, Pandu 5, ..., Sudama 27, Drtarashtra 100, Krishna 1000s. What was the case with common populace ? Did commoners practice self restraint or some form of ayurvedic contraception ? If they did restrain the number of children what was the reason ? How should a devotee view family planning ? As there is no guarantee of a child becoming a devotee, how should a devotee approach the issue of having children ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theist Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 How should a devotee view family planning ? As there is no guarantee of a child becoming a devotee, how should a devotee approach the issue of having children ? It should be viewed as service to Krsna. Influencing others towards Krsna Consciousness is all one can do. The final decisions ultimately will rest with them as the grow. But influencing others seems to me to be all the guru can do as well as each soul has its own inherent free will. So the father and mother should see their duty to act as loving gurus to the souls that Krsna places into their sphere of influence. This is a great service. They will have to assess their own capacity from the economic angle, their own pyscho/emotional stamina,(I hear it can be trying at times) and how a family and what size can work within their own personal sadhana. For the cat or dog no forethought is required. For the devotees they should really think long and hard before taking on this responsibity. Not being able to control some sex urge is not what it is all about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 The doctor yells :number 1, and the nurse yells : out! The doctor yells :number 2, and the nurse yells : out! The doctor yells :number 3, and the nurse yells : out! The doctor yells :number 4, and the nurse yells : out! ------------------------1 hour later---------------------- The doctor yells :number 100 and the nurse yells : out! phew! then there is another head showing! the doctor weakly calls out number 101 and the nurse weakly says /images/graemlins/blush.gifut!. They both look at the girl and she says : "what do I do, they just keep coming" -------------------------- poster : I_Love_krishna_ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theist Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 And now the papa is thinking about the five jobs he will need to feed them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 /images/graemlins/smile.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yasodanandana Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 we should have children if we are sufficiently sure to care for them spiritually and materially.. so this is the rule so you and your wife have to judge how many children you can care for in both ways the worst thing is to have children only to satisfy the urge of sex i have seen too much devotees prematurely married and mather and father only to have a little sex with the illusion of respecting in this way the regulative principles....... with very often the result of divorce or sons with problems better to do the "little" sin (in comparison) to have some "illicit" sex (or sex without the intention to procreate) than do unwanted children prabhupada says that if the son does not become a devotee, is illicit sex even if we have observed all the samskaras of course ... in my humble opinion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I_love_krishna_ Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 The blessing "May you be the mother of 100 children" is just a blessing in disguise. The true meaning of the blessing as said by some one saintly in my life is to ensure fertility in the young woman. Also, the intimacy in the couple. Thats all. The best thing for us to do is to decrease the attachment to our material bodies and increase attachment to our soul and krishna. So, my opinion on this is have kids but keep the number down to two or one. /images/graemlins/smile.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
livingentity Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 one was enough for me! Thank you very much!! /images/graemlins/crazy.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
livingentity Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 The doctor yells :number 1, and the nurse yells : out! STOP!!! ow..ow..ow..you just shot me 31 years back in time! I need to lay down now!!! ow..ow..ow... /images/graemlins/ooo.gif Where is the screaming and cursing smilie??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Govindaram Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 Hare Krishna From the Mahabharata Dhitarastra's wife had 100 boys, beat that! /images/graemlins/smirk.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
livingentity Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 I am a wimp - I admit it. By the way, big talk for a MAN!! You try it!! /images/graemlins/wink.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theist Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 The whole pregnancy/birth thing is sooo strange. A little body growing inside another body...wierd. Better if they grew on special trees or something. Such a deep illusion. People think they have created life by this process. I have heard that during birth women will swear "never again" but right after birth they are ready for another one. Apparently LE got the message the first time. Being in a male body it is all so mysterious to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 Because she can't bear to see her body after all 100 deliveries. /images/graemlins/wink.gif _______ I_L_the big K Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
livingentity Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 for getting caught up in the fun and helping to distract from his original intent for this thread. But... > > > > > > > (pointing at I_L_K_) She started it!!! /images/graemlins/laugh.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 /images/graemlins/smile.gif Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 prabhupada says that if the son does not become a devotee, is illicit sex even if we have observed all the samskaras Prabhu, could you kindly direct me to the reference of this quote. I'm not doubting that Srila Prabhupada said this, I would just like to know where I could find the quote. Your servant, Guest J. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yasodanandana Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 i am sorry, it is in an "harisauri diary" i have all and they are very thick of course i apologize but it is also logical licit sex is for have children and father and mother have the duty to bring the sons to krsna.... if this does not happens all the legitimation goes away Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 17, 2003 Report Share Posted July 17, 2003 Prabhupada: That is sinful. Don't you see, illicit sex, what havoc it has done? Mr. Koshi: What exactly do you mean? Prabhupada: Illicit sex, do you think it is...? Mr. Koshi: Outside marriage, you mean? Prabhupada: Yes. Not only outside marriage. Even in marriage, you cannot have sex as you like. You must have sex according to the regulative principle or religious principle. Mr. Koshi: Could you explain? Prabhupada: Yes. Just like only for begetting nice children. Mr. Koshi: For begetting? Prabhupada: Nice children. Tamala Krsna: Good children. Mr. Koshi: What is the meaning of good children? Prabhupada: Good children means not these rogues and thieves, but one who can understand God. That is good children. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.