krsna Posted May 2, 2004 Report Share Posted May 2, 2004 Religious Symbols Explained, Including the Swastika http://www.roanoke.com/roatimes/news/story166352.html KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, May 1, 2004: Saturday, May 01, 2004: This story in the Kansas City Star begins, "Show an empty cross to most Christians at Easter and their minds will go to the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ. It's a powerful symbol. But some American Indians may see a symbol similar to a cross and think of the spiritual meaning of the four directions. To Hindus, a cross shaped in the form of a swastika means peace. In pre-Christian Chinese tradition, a cross represented perfection. Because most religious symbols are often common objects, scholars say, they are often commonly shared across those traditions. But from faith to faith, the meaning of the symbols can be similar or quite different. Almost every religion has a symbol that resembles a cross, and it's a perfect example of one symbol with multiple and even contradictory meanings." It goes on, "The swastika cross has been a symbol of peace used by Hindus for thousands of years during prayer and worship services, said Anand Bhattacharyya, a Hindu. But because it was used as a Nazi symbol, a lot of visitors to the Hindu temple are curious about its presence there, Bhattacharyya said. They have to explain that the word 'swastika' comes from the Sanskrit word for peace. This article goes on to discuss many aspects of religious symbols." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krsna Posted January 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted January 18, 2005 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4183467.stm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2005 Report Share Posted January 19, 2005 Hare Krishna, I think the word can be split as "Su + Asti + Ka" Su = GOOD(in a Transcendental way) Asti = To Be Ka = This siffix indicates similarity So the word "Svati" actually refers to Visnu ALONE. It is in Visnu SahasranAmA. It means one is AUSPICIOUS and full of Bliss. That symbol which confers this auspiciousness upon devotees is "Svastika". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krsna Posted January 21, 2005 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2005 UK Hindus Start Campaign to Prevent Europe-Wide Ban on Swastika http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4188141.stm LONDON, ENGLAND, January 20, 2004: Hindus in the UK are starting a campaign to reclaim the swastika from its Nazi associations. German MEPs called for a Europe-wide ban of the symbol after Prince Harry wore it on a fancy dress costume. But Hindu Forum spokesman Ramesh Kallidai said the swastika had been a Hindu good luck charm for centuries. The group will stage public awareness workshops across the UK and lobby politicians in an attempt to educate the public and prevent a ban, he said. "It's the second most sacred symbol in the Hindu tradition which has been used for 5,000 years to ward off evil," Mr. Kallidai said. The forum would make a particular effort to get the message across to Jewish groups, he added. "After all it is the Jewish anguish that needs to be considered. They were the community that was most affected by the misuse of the swastika so naturally they would have concerns. "Hindus use the swastika merely as a religious sacrament, to express their devotion to God, surely nobody can have any objections to that," he said. Displaying the swastika is illegal in Germany. However, Mr. Kallidai said a similar ban in the UK would have an adverse affect on Hindus who regarded a swastika in much the same way as a Christian viewed a cross. Buddhists also view the swastika as a good luck charm. "You find it in houses, temples and in portraits of Hindu gods. A swastika is even painted on the head of a baby who's just had his first hair-cutting sacrament," he said. The Hindu swastika faces to the right, unlike the one adopted by the Nazis which faces to the left. ( note: This is a commonly repeated but incorrect statement. Hindus use both the left- and right-handed swastikas, and examples can be found of both together on Indus Valley seals.) It is also traditionally red, a color regarded as auspicious by Hindus. "Just because at a particular moment in history one section of society used it, or a mirror image, to unleash xenophobic ideology does not mean Hindus should be punished," Mr. Kallidai said. "It's like saying the Ku Klux Klan burn crosses so therefore let's ban the use of crosses worldwide." The Hindu Forum's campaign has gained backing from other groups. Maganbhai Patel of Leicester's Hindu Association said the general public's confusion needed to be addressed. "Hindus have been using the swastika for centuries, whereas it was only adopted by Hitler comparatively recently, in the 1920s and 1930s. "We use it for marriage ceremonies and also for other religious ceremonies and events," Mr. Patel said. And Kapil Dudakia, of Milton Keynes Hindu Association, said the swastika was viewed "positively" by billions of people around the world including followers of the Buddhist and Jain faiths. "When I got married, literally as soon as you entered the hall where the marriage took place you saw swastikas everywhere. They were also on the invitation cards," he said. "It's only in certain quarters of the Western world where you've got these very negative connotations. "What we've got to do is separate the evil of Hitler and his ideology from the symbol of the swastika which actually means something quite different," Mr. Dudakia said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krsna Posted February 5, 2005 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2005 Member of European . Says Europe Needs History Lesson On the Swastika robertevansmep@btclick.com LONDON, UNITED KINGDOM, February 2, 2005: The following news released was received from the office of Robert Evans ("source"), Labour Member of the European . for London: Labour Member of the European ., Robert Evans has called for a European campaign on the real history of the swastika to highlight its importance to Europe's Hindus. "The swastika was not invented by Hitler" said Robert Evans. "In fact, it has been used for over 3,000 years by many cultures, in particular the Hindu, Jain and Buddhist communities to represent life, sun, power, peace, strength and good luck.Whilst of course I understand why some MEPs are suggesting the swastika should be banned, in reality this would have the effect of discriminating against Europe's one million plus Hindus and deprive them of their sacred symbol." In a European . Written Declaration, co-tabled by West Midlands MEP Neena Gill, they refer to the fact that the word "swastika" comes from the old Indian or Sanskrit word svastika (to be good) and that until the twentieth century it was not associated with anything other than positive messages. "To Hindus, it's the second most sacred symbol in their tradition and has been used for several thousand years to ward off evil. Unlike the Nazi swastika which faced left, the Hindu swastika faces to the right and by tradition it is red, a color regarded as auspicious by Hindus." states Robert Evans. (HPI adds: This is, in part, a common piece of misinformation. Hindus use both the right and left swastikas, and there are examples even on Indus Valley seals.) "The swastika was adopted by Adolf Hitler's Nazis in 1920. It then became a symbol of all that is evil and was associated with the greatest crimes in the history of mankind." "I completely condemn its use for xenophobic, racial hatred or right wing purposes. However, what is needed now is tolerance and understanding. The swastika in a different form is very important to millions of Hindus across Europe and the rest of the world." added Robert Evans. "Of course this issue has to be handled sensitively and I am very conscious of the anguish that the use of the swastika causes to the Jewish Community, but for Hindus the swastika is a religious sacrament, to express their devotion to God. In London I have seen it in many houses and in Hindu temples." "It must be possible to separate the evil of Hitler and his ideology from the Hindu symbol which actually means almost the opposite." concluded Mr Evans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2005 Report Share Posted February 5, 2005 The only difference is who is the speaker from the two articles. Mr. Kallidai in one, and Mr. Evans in the other. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.