Guest guest Posted June 16, 2004 Report Share Posted June 16, 2004 Yeah, I just haven't developed that pyschic ability yet. Devotees prefer to depend on transcendental realization. Of course, it takes one to know one... Aside from that, the reasons some here may appear anonymously cannot always be so easily assumed. Should anyone want to reply to a specific post/poster, the "quote" function is readily available [see above]. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theist Posted June 16, 2004 Report Share Posted June 16, 2004 Very deep and mysterious. Filled with hidden meaning I'm sure. What could those reasons be I wonder? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2004 Report Share Posted June 16, 2004 Only Maitreya may tell us? Otherwise not. Psychic Guest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2004 Report Share Posted June 16, 2004 So much remains beyond our control. Best to accept that reality and finally stop trying to create our own. All depends on His Divine Grace and ultimately that is outside of ALL control. Love and Devotion is the key, not mental manipulations -- however clever they may appear. Surrender to Her and everything becomes much more clear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theist Posted June 16, 2004 Report Share Posted June 16, 2004 Puru is that you? Are you now in ghost form for some reason? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 16, 2004 Report Share Posted June 16, 2004 Puru is that you? Are you now in ghost form for some reason? Still think it's a game of hide and seek? "Round and round the mulberry bush, the monkey chased the weasel..." Originally this thread began with a heartfelt post, eventually replied to in kind by someone who actually seemed to understand the topic. Somehow it deteriorated into far too familiar territory. Sorry, but I prefer to no longer play. Try again elsewhere, Kailasa prabhu. Of course, with almost 4500 posts to his "credit", he can be expected to pop up anywhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theist Posted June 16, 2004 Report Share Posted June 16, 2004 for withdrawing and showing me mercy thereby mr. weasal. This monkey appreciates it. Being haunted by a poltergist was way too bewildering for this simple soul. Scarey too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2004 Report Share Posted June 18, 2004 Seek the gold, not the stool and thus avoid also bewilderment. Discern the merit in what is said rather than who said it and what is their status. As Guru AC Bhaktivedanta Swami would say, "If there is gold in a heap of stool it is still gold". Get off your stool and go for gold. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2004 Report Share Posted June 23, 2004 ***That might be a danger sign for you. /images/graemlins/smile.gif Oh, yes. /images/graemlins/smile.gif ***Your english has gotten MUCH better in just the past short time. Thanks. It is blessings Jagat. /images/graemlins/smile.gif ***We pretty much agree on everything I think. Diksa guru needs. No good all diksa guru? /images/graemlins/smile.gif Thanks Prabhu. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harish Posted June 23, 2004 Report Share Posted June 23, 2004 Diksha ensures and agreement between the Guru and Shishya so that the Shishya has understood exactly what Guru had to convey and finally they are in agreement with each other perfectly. Shiksha has no such contact, it is one-way, so how do you ensure that transmission of knowldege through Shiksha does not lead to various branches of understanding? Should not there be Diksha at some level at least? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 23, 2004 Report Share Posted June 23, 2004 ***Diksha ensures and agreement between the Guru and Shishya so that the Shishya has understood exactly what Guru had to convey and finally they are in agreement with each other perfectly. Diksa it is not blind following. ***Shiksha has no such contact, it is one-way, No. Disciple choise guru according sadhu and sastra. Disciple never follow guru blindly, it is wrong. ***so how do you ensure that transmission of knowldege through Shiksha does not lead to various branches of understanding? Disciple person, then needs two-way contact. One-way contact - it is zomby GM. ***Should not there be Diksha at some level at least? High sense - diksa it is spiritual body. Spiritual body - cit sacti it is top knowlwge. Fron cit sakti go - ananda - spiritual excange. But first needs all knowlege. Person not stay in spiritual level artifically. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 28, 2004 Report Share Posted June 28, 2004 Dikas and siksa - it is eqal. In some - diksa main, in some siksa main. Person not follow only one diksa guru - it is imposiible. Any way - diksa, siksa and sastra - it is critery truth. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.