Guest guest Posted October 14, 2004 Report Share Posted October 14, 2004 Hare Krishna , Can some one explain me why the sex pictures are present on some of the famous temple in India. Like Jagganath Puri temple. Hari Bol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gHari Posted October 14, 2004 Report Share Posted October 14, 2004 That those depictons would keep lusty people out of the temple. They would become too lusty to enter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 15, 2004 Report Share Posted October 15, 2004 ...Or keep non-lusty people out because they think the temple is lusty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VNV Posted October 15, 2004 Report Share Posted October 15, 2004 That's actually pretty weird when you think about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 15, 2004 Report Share Posted October 15, 2004 The temple was built when buddhism in India had reached its peak. Most of the hindus had converted to buddhists and had become monks. In order to change them to Hindus and get them back to grhastashram. These were carved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 15, 2004 Report Share Posted October 15, 2004 Indian views on sexuality are quite different than in most western cultures. In much of Hinduism when dieties et al engage in such past times they are manifesting the creation of the world, the bringing about of dharma, revealing tantric mysteries, and many similar concepts, depending on which particular image one discusses. We (Gaudiya Vaisnavas) are not without similar concepts in the Blessed Rasa Lila. There are many images of Sri Sri Radhe Krsna that the English (Muslims and others) objected to due to their graphic depictions of divine sexuality. It is not a matter of trying to arouse passions to keep people in or out of temples; such is intended to be a sacred representation of the creative powers in most cases (and are often either between Lord Siva and His consorts or Sri Krsna and His). In the West we tend to seperate everything, religion, God, work, entertainment, sexuality... on and on... India tends to be quite inclusive, viewing all life experiences as part of the Divine Dance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jagannatha Posted October 15, 2004 Report Share Posted October 15, 2004 Indian views on sexuality are quite different than in most western cultures. In much of Hinduism when dieties et al engage in such past times they are manifesting the creation of the world, the bringing about of dharma, revealing tantric mysteries, and many similar concepts, depending on which particular image one discusses. We (Gaudiya Vaisnavas) are not without similar concepts in the Blessed Rasa Lila. There are many images of Sri Sri Radhe Krsna that the English (Muslims and others) objected to due to their graphic depictions of divine sexuality. It is not a matter of trying to arouse passions to keep people in or out of temples; such is intended to be a sacred representation of the creative powers in most cases (and are often either between Lord Siva and His consorts or Sri Krsna and His). In the West we tend to seperate everything, religion, God, work, entertainment, sexuality... on and on... India tends to be quite inclusive, viewing all life experiences as part of the Divine Dance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 15, 2004 Report Share Posted October 15, 2004 Must of the people here show total ignorance in relation to Tantra yoga. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gHari Posted October 15, 2004 Report Share Posted October 15, 2004 God Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.