ABOUT CRITICISM

[Pankaja_Dasa]

 

 

Just leave my comments so telling why I am posting this, after reading it I always think, but Prabhupada called many people raskals many times, so how is it that we are not to call? But then Prabhupada is Pure devotee, RESPRESENTATIVE OF KRISHNA. Haribol

 

---

ABOUT CRITICISM

 

 

Hilo, Hawaii: February 7, 2005 (Part 2)

Bhaktivedanta Narayana Maharaja

 

 

 

 

 

 

Once, Srila Prabhupada Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura sent some devotees to preach in Bengal, and they preached very well. They wanted to establish a preaching center there, and they asked Srila Prabhupada Sarasvati Thakura, “What should we do?” He replied, “I will be very happy if you establish a preaching center, and when you are ready I will come there with many devotees.” They began preparing the preaching center – working day and night – making it very good with all kinds of equipment so that Srila Prabhupada would come there and be happy. They made a temple in that center, and the

 

Deities were ready and waiting to be installed by Srila Prabhupada.

 

 

 

Srila Prabhupada arrived at the temple at mid-day, he saw everything, and he became pleased. Then he asked, “Where is the brahmacari who came here first and worked so hard.” They told him, “Master, that devotee was a very good brahmacari, but then he became entangled with a lady. We rebuked him so much for his behavior that he fled from this place.”

 

 

 

Srila Prabhupada said, “I don’t want to establish a preaching center here, nor do I want to install the Deities. You know, in this world we spend hundreds of gallons of blood to bring a person out of the clutches of maya, and if that person makes some mistake, it will be washed away by his serving Hari, Guru, and Vaisnavas. But you have chastised him and he has gone away. So I don’t want to make a center here. Search for him and bring him to me; otherwise I will go away.”

 

 

 

All the disciples became very anxious, and they began searching everywhere for that brahmacari who was entangled with a lady. Sripad Madhava Maharaja, who at that time was named Hayagriva brahmacari, somehow discovered his whereabouts. He apologized to that brahmacari, and said, “Please excuse me. Srila Prabhupada is very unhappy with us. Please come.”

 

 

 

The brahmacari began to weep, saying, “Prabhupada is very merciful. I was serving here, in a watch company, but I was not really happy. I wanted to return, but I was thinking, ‘How can I show my face?’ So I did not return. But Srila Prabhupada has called. What endless mercy he has! He is more merciful than Lord Krsna.” He at once went running and weeping to Srila Prabhupada, fell flat at his Guru Maharaja’s lotus feet, and all his

 

anarthas were washed away in a moment.

 

 

 

So, don’t criticize anyone – neither a devotee nor a worldly person. It has been told in Srimad-Bhagavatam (11.28.1-2):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sri-bhagavan uvaca

 

para-svabhava-karmani

 

na prasamsen na garhayet

 

visvam ekamakam pasyan

 

prakrtya purusena ca

 

 

 

[“The Supreme Personality of Godhead said: ‘One should neither praise nor criticize the conditioned nature and activities of other persons. Rather, one should see this world as simply the combination of material nature and the enjoying souls, all based on the one Absolute Truth.”]

 

 

 

para-svabhava-karmani

 

yah prasamsati nindati

 

sa asu bhrasyate svarthad

 

asaty abhinivesatah

 

 

 

[“Whoever indulges in praising or criticizing the qualities and behavior of others will quickly become deviated from his own best interest by his entanglement in illusory dualities.”]

 

 

 

Don’t glorify worldly persons, whether they are good or bad. If you do so, all their bad activities will come in you and your life will be spoiled.

 

 

 

To bring a person from the clutches of maya is very, very hard. If lust or any other attachment is present in that person’s heart it will go away very soon, if he is chanting and remembering and listening to hari-katha. Be very careful. Don’t criticize devotees – or non-devotees. First look at your own condition, and try to purify yourself. Is there any lust in you? Is there any kutinati (deceit) in you, or not? Be worried for that; don’t worry for others. Sri Guru and Lord Sri Krsna are responsible for others. You cannot do anything to help them, so you have no right to criticize.

 

 

 

It has been told in scripture:

 

 

 

nasta-prayesu abhadresu

 

nityam bhagavata-sevaya

 

bhagavaty uttama-sloke

 

bhaktir bhavati naisthiki

 

 

 

[“By regular attendance in classes on the Bhagavatam and by rendering of service to the pure devotee, all that is troublesome to the heart is almost completely destroyed, and loving service unto the Personality of Godhead, who is praised with transcendental songs, is established as an irrevocable fact.”(Srimad-Bhagavatam 1.2.18)]

 

 

What is anisthita-bhakti (unsteady bhakti)? [srila Narayana Maharaja called on Sripad Madhava Maharaja to explain the six kinds of anisithita-bhakti. To save time in transcribing, we are attaching here the explanation given in Sri Bhakti-rasamrta-sindhu-bindhu. Please see endnote 1.]

 

 

 

Try to listen carefully. Keep the explanation in your heart and try to follow what you are hearing.

 

 

 

After one passes this stage, there are no aparadhas (offenses), no hrdaya-durbalya (weakness of heart), no asat-trsna (thirst for temporary enjoyment), and no svarupa-brahma (illusions about philosophy and practical application of philosoply). However, some other anarthas remain, such as laya, viksepa, apratipatti, kasaya, rasavada, etc. [see endnote 2.]

 

 

 

We will gradually explain all these topics.

 

 

 

We will have to gallop through so many stages. Prema is not easy to attain – especially vraja-gopi-bhava. It takes thousands upon thousands of births to reach. Now you can come to the stage in which you are hearing hari-katha. If you miss this opportunity, everything will be missed. If you are following, on the other hand, all anarthas will gradually go away.

 

 

 

Srimad-Bhagavatam states:

 

 

 

katha imas te kathita mahiyasam

 

vitaya lokesu yasah pareyusam

 

vijnana-vairagya-vivaksaya vibho

 

vaco-vibhutir na tu paramarthyam

 

 

 

[“Sukadeva Gosvami said: O mighty Pariksit, I have related to you the narrations of all these great kings, who spread their fame throughout the world and then departed. My real purpose was to teach transcendental knowledge and renunciation. Stories of kings lend power and opulence to these narrations, but do not in themselves constitute the ultimate aspect of knowledge.” (Srimad-Bhagavatam 12.3.14)]

 

 

 

Srila Bhaktivinoda Thakura has explained in his Srimad Bhagavatarka-marici-mala that so many powerful kings, like Puru, Uttanapada, his brother Priyavrata and many others passed away. Srila Sukadeva Gosvami has said, “I have discussed the histories of these kings in Srimad-Bhagavatam. Why have I done so? These narrations do not constitute the ultimate transcendental attainment in and of themselves. What is there in them, then? Vairagya-vivaksaya (renunciation with the desire for teaching). What became of them? They were not happy. Sri Narada taught the allegorical history of Puranjana to King Pracinabarhi. Puranjana was not satisfied with his wife, children and kingdom; he was cheated.

 

 

 

You should realize the teachings of the Bhagavatam, and then detachment from worldly sense gratification will enter your heart. If you are hearing hari-katha, chanting the holy name and performing all devotional activities, renunciation must come.

 

 

 

We should hear all topics, such as the histories of the great kings mentioned above, for this purpose, and after that we can hear the 10th Canto of Srimad Bhagavatam narrations of the sweet pastimes of Lord Sri Krsna. First make the ground level, and then hear the glories of the Lord’s pastimes (lila-katha). We will try to explain His glories from the 10th Canto in the next three days. We have explained anartha-nvrtti, and tomorrow we will try to discuss Lord Krsna’s pastimes.

 

 

 

Gaura premanande.

 

 

 

[Endnote 1 – (The following is the six kinds of unsteady bhakti (anisthita-bhakti), as explained in Madhurya-kadambini by Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura) Utsaha-mayi: A brahmana child, having just begun study of the scriptures, thinks he has immediately become a learned scholar worthy of everyone's praise. Similarly, a person just beginning devotional service may have the audacity to think that he has mastered everything. This is

 

called utsaha-mayi, or filled (puffed-up) with enthusiasm.

 

 

 

Ghana-tarala: The same child at times diligently engages in his studies, and yet at other times, due to inability to understand the schoolbooks or lack of real taste, is negligent. In the same way, a new devotee will sometimes practice the different forms of devotional service and at other times neglect them. Being sometimes diligent and at other times negligent, his endeavor is called ghana-tarala (condensed-dilute, thick-thin).

 

 

 

Vyudha-vikalpa: "Shall I just spend my life happily in family life, making my wife and children Krsna conscious and worshipping the Lord? Or should I give them all up and go to Vrndavana to perfect myself by engaging full time in hearing and chanting with no distractions? Shall I wait till the last stage, after enjoying all sorts of pleasures and I've finally understood that the whole material world is simply a forest fire of affliction? Or is

 

it better that I renounce right now? In this way, the mind spends time vacillating between the life of renunciation and household life considering the different options. This is called vyudha-vikalpa, or extensive speculation.

 

 

 

Visaya-sangara: Seeing that material enjoyment is forcibly carrying him away and impairing his steadiness in serving Krsna, the devotee resolves to renounce his addictions and take shelter of the holy name. But many times his attempts at renunciation often end in enjoying what he's trying to renounce. This on-going battle with his desires for sense enjoyment from former habit, where he sometimes meets with victory and sometimes with defeat, is called visaya-sangara, or struggle with sense pleasure.

 

 

 

Niyamaksama: Then the devotee will resolve, "From today I will chant such and such number of rounds of japa and will pay so many obeisances. I'll also perform services for the devotees. I won't talk about anything except the Lord, and I'll give up all association with people who talk gossip." Though the devotee makes such resolutions every day, he is not always able to carry them out. This is called niyamaksama, or inability to follow rules.

 

 

 

Visaya-sangara is the inability to give up sense enjoyment, while niyamaksama is the inability to improve his devotional service.

 

 

 

Taranga-rangini: Finally, it is well-known that the very nature of bhakti is to be attractive, thus many people become attracted to the devotee. And, as the old adage goes, "By the public's attraction one becomes wealthy." Bhakti produces much opportunity for material gain, worship, and position (labha, puja, pratistha). These are weeds around the creeper of bhakti. Seeking one's pleasure (ranga) amidst these weed-like facilities, which are but

 

small waves (taranga) in the ocean of bhakti, is called taranga-rangini, delighting in material facilities. (Madurya kadambini pages 15-18)]

 

 

 

[Endnote 2: (From Madhurya Kadambini by Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura) Laya means the tendency to sleep during kirtana, sravana, and smarana (japa), in order of increasing tendency. Viksepa means distraction toward mundane topics while doing devotional service (gossiping while doing japa). Apratipatti refers to the occasional inability to absorb the mind in kirtana and other services in spite of the absence of laya or viksepa. Kasaya refers to the innate tendency toward such qualities as anger, greed and pride. Rasasvada means the inability to absorb the mind in kirtana and other services if one gets the opportunity for the material sense pleasure. Nisthita-bhakti appears in the absence of these faults.]

 

 

 

Editorial Advisors: Sripad Madhava Maharaja and Sripad Brajanatha dasa

 

Editor: Syamarani dasi

 

Transcriber: Vasanti dasi

 

Typist: Jai Sri dasi

 

[stonehearted]

Why we are not to criticize others is clearly explained in the quotation you posted. Furthermore, in a letter to a disciple, Srila Sarasvati Thakura wrote,

"Srimad-Bhagavatam has instructed us not to praise or criticise others' nature or activities. It is sadi in Sri Chaitanya Bhagavat that one goes to Hell by criticizing others. My instruction to you is to not criticize others, but to correct and purify yourself. I am forced to criticize my own disciples and those who havecome to me for instruction. I do not understand why you would go out of your way to try to perform such a difficult task."

 

The real question is, then, why would we criticize others? If we're ordered to take a strong stance by the Lord or our spiritual master, then we must. Otherwise, we should carefully follow the order of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

[Guest guest]

Hope alls well on isle of big. You make great point here. When we criticize, which may be a duty, one must be prepared to commit as a spiritual master the person whom he is criticizing. The quote is very explicit in this regard.

 

So when we say, "My friend, you are greatly fooled", that person just may bow to you, agreeing, and saying, "Thank you sir. Will you now instruct me to not be foolish?"

 

So what do you do now? Bhaktisiddhanta asks why take on such a difficult task? He doesnt forbid one from doing so, but declares it a difficult job. So when we cxriticize others, we must be ready to accept full responsibility as Guru accepts for disciple. Otherwise, just practice mauna, silence. Be grave, which doesnt mean bummed out all the time, rather carefully choose your words.

 

Hare Krsna, ys, mahaksadasa

[stonehearted]

I think Mahaksa brings up an important point: the responsibility of the critic. We may take such a responsibility on occasion, but everything depends on our relationship with the person we intend to correct. If we don't have a close relationship, or the kind of relationship that would cause the audience to take our instructions to heart, then we must be very cautious in doing so. And we should be very careful to fashion our remarks in such a way that they are most likely to bring about the desired result. Otherwise, we may have to bear some culpability if the audience responds unfavorably.

[Kulapavana]

when you see that there is something wrong going on around you, but you just keep silent, out of fear of "becoming an offender" or "going to hell" you BECOME A PART OF THE WRONGDOING. keep that in mind too. I have seen scores of "good devotees" keeping silent when they should have been speaking out loudly against the injustice around them.

 

there is no cookie cutter answer to such dillemas. use your heart, and use your brain. quotes from good sources are no substitute for your own conscience.

[stonehearted]

I agree that we should speak and act on our realizations. But our attempts to "correct" others, or to correct situations, should be carefully fashioned so that we may have thebest chance of achiving the desired effect. Part of that calculation is considering our relationships with those involved. Sometimes it may be more appropriate to move others in better postions to speak or act.