Guest guest Posted October 27, 2003 Report Share Posted October 27, 2003 As we all know, Helen Keller was blind. She had various teachers try to teach her and they all gave up. At that time, braile was not invented and they considered blind people as the 'lost cause'. The authorities, due to their lack of insight, judged Helen Keller because of her condition and learning disability. Then comes along the Truely Comassionate Guru, who at all costs tries to understand Helen. She did not come to Helen Keller and demand that she learn this way and that and that she have Faith to prove her willingness to learn. Helen Keller wanted to learn, but it took extreme love for the Guru to love her and teach her according to her abilities. This is where Guru's are no different. All disciples want to learn, that is the nature of most people seeking. If the Guru becomes Authoritarian and considers the disciple a lost cause because the disciple didn't surrender in the exact way the Guru wanted them to, then the Guru is ineffective. What is going to work with this one student? What does she need to hear in order for her to open up? What do I need to cultivate in order to service her the way she will understand? This is when the Guru may beed to behave unorthodox so that the student will learn. Here's an example of mine: I failed algebra 2 years in a row, passed the 3rd year with a C. All teachers thought I wasn't studying. They thought I would goof off after school. (Little did they know I was learning Opera 3-4 hours per day) but I would still do 2 hours of algebra at night. I tried so hard and felt so inept that I couldn't understand. It wasn't until I was 18 that I decided to apply for a teller position at a Bank. My mother said, "OK, Kelly - here are some math problems, basic math, lets see how you do because you will be tested." Mom put some figures down on paper for me. She watched me as I added, subtracted, mulitplied and divided. Then all of a sudden, "Kelly! What are you doing!!!????" You are carrying wrong, honey, don't you know how to carry your numbers over??" Then I said, "Mom, this is the way I always did it. This is how you carry the left over." Then mom said, "No, that is not the way, here let me show you." then she showed me. Can you believe all 3 teachers of albegra thought me to be unable to learn and judged me harshly because THEY never saw my math in action? They never looked to find where I was making the mistake, where I didn't understand. Was it my fault? No, it was the teachers. They should be watching to see where the student is not getting it. Instead the assumed I didn't want to learn. It was they who had the teaching disability, they didn't care enough to find out I was dislexic. This story relates to the Guru. Disciples want to learn, but if the Guru is who they say they are, then they should have enough compassion to learn what the student will need and enough to give it attention. Helen Keller became great because of her teacher. Her teacher submitted herself to Helen in order to learn from Helen so that she could teach Helen. How many Guru's do that today? From what I see, Guru's think the disciple is the lost cause if they don't 'get it'. That is the sad thing.... The idea that there are many Guru's but few disciples means the Guru's didn't care enough for the disciple and the disciples had to move on to find another way. We are all trying our hardest. The last thing a devotee needs to hear is that it's their problem. I hope I was heard correctly. I have worked with people at all levels in the business world, from CIO's to the mailroom and I don't treat any of them differently. This goes for Guru's. I will love them, but the relationship needs to be a partnership, not a masichistic one. I'm innovative and look the the untired ways - what works. Tradition for it's own sake can be ineffective. Jai Maa! Kelly Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2003 Report Share Posted October 28, 2003 Hi Kelly, I think your reference to Annie Sullivan--Helen Keller's teacher--is beautiful. Ever since I was a little girl, I have always loved Anne Sullivan, and would read Helen Keller's story over and over because I loved the miracle of their relationship so much! How tireless both were in their own way; but also, if you read the story closely, you will see that until Helen released her old ways to finally pay attention to Annie's persevering teachings, they got no where! Helen fought and fought to stay the way she had been....and it was painful for her parents to watch the struggle, so much so that Annie had to demand their non interference while she began the slow task of teaching Helen discipline--the desire to truly surrender to truth and knowledge. At the same time, Annie had to call upon her own observations of Helen to be a truly excellent teacher, as you point out in a way. But that is not enough, it can't be enough. The "student" or "disciple" or "learner"--whatever you want to call them-- has much to sacrifice in order to truly allow the teaching. Sometimes it feels to that "ego" (or the "I"-ness,the one who thinks they know) very painful, even wrong. What a process! Trust is so key.....when I think back again on that relationship between Anne and Helen, trust became the linch pin, and it was on both sides....the student has to face themselves, and let go; the teacher sees beyond overt behavior and gives teaching according to the student's capacity. Both give attention to each other, which as it intensifies becomes true love, which calls for sacrifice and is the impetus for change. When there is that giving and receiving, and giving up and letting go, and so on...how wonderful. Real "magic" then happens. I think many people hop from teacher to teacher in the hopes that "this time,the teacher will understand ME" sometimes not realizing they don't understand themselves yet, and may be unwilling to sacrifice worn out ways of perceiving. Very, very difficult, I believe; but also, the only way to sincerely learn one's self. In the Rudrastadyayai, especially in chapter 8, it is so incredibly told: all is in me--everything! and all depends on the sacrifice, which is in me too. It remains for us to allow ourselves to be shown, or to see. Jai satguru! , Kelly Leeper <blissnout> wrote: > In addendum to my 2 emails regarding Guru and dsciple relationships, I will tell the story of Helen Keller. > > As we all know, Helen Keller was blind. She had various teachers try to teach her and they all gave up. At that time, braile was not invented and they considered blind people as the 'lost cause'. The authorities, due to their lack of insight, judged Helen Keller because of her condition and learning disability. > > Then comes along the Truely Comassionate Guru, who at all costs tries to understand Helen. She did not come to Helen Keller and demand that she learn this way and that and that she have Faith to prove her willingness to learn. Helen Keller wanted to learn, but it took extreme love for the Guru to love her and teach her according to her abilities. > This is where Guru's are no different. All disciples want to learn, that is the nature of most people seeking. If the Guru becomes Authoritarian and considers the disciple a lost cause because the disciple didn't surrender in the exact way the Guru wanted them to, then the Guru is ineffective. What is going to work with this one student? What does she need to hear in order for her to open up? What do I need to cultivate in order to service her the way she will understand? This is when the Guru may beed to behave unorthodox so that the student will learn. > > Here's an example of mine: I failed algebra 2 years in a row, passed the 3rd year with a C. All teachers thought I wasn't studying. They thought I would goof off after school. (Little did they know I was learning Opera 3-4 hours per day) but I would still do 2 hours of algebra at night. I tried so hard and felt so inept that I couldn't understand. > It wasn't until I was 18 that I decided to apply for a teller position at a Bank. My mother said, "OK, Kelly - here are some math problems, basic math, lets see how you do because you will be tested." Mom put some figures down on paper for me. She watched me as I added, subtracted, mulitplied and divided. Then all of a sudden, "Kelly! What are you doing!!!????" You are carrying wrong, honey, don't you know how to carry your numbers over??" Then I said, "Mom, this is the way I always did it. This is how you carry the left over." Then mom said, "No, that is not the way, here let me show you." then she showed me. > > Can you believe all 3 teachers of albegra thought me to be unable to learn and judged me harshly because THEY never saw my math in action? They never looked to find where I was making the mistake, where I didn't understand. Was it my fault? No, it was the teachers. They should be watching to see where the student is not getting it. Instead the assumed I didn't want to learn. It was they who had the teaching disability, they didn't care enough to find out I was dislexic. > > This story relates to the Guru. Disciples want to learn, but if the Guru is who they say they are, then they should have enough compassion to learn what the student will need and enough to give it attention. Helen Keller became great because of her teacher. Her teacher submitted herself to Helen in order to learn from Helen so that she could teach Helen. How many Guru's do that today? From what I see, Guru's think the disciple is the lost cause if they don't 'get it'. That is the sad thing.... > > The idea that there are many Guru's but few disciples means the Guru's didn't care enough for the disciple and the disciples had to move on to find another way. > We are all trying our hardest. The last thing a devotee needs to hear is that it's their problem. > > I hope I was heard correctly. I have worked with people at all levels in the business world, from CIO's to the mailroom and I don't treat any of them differently. This goes for Guru's. I will love them, but the relationship needs to be a partnership, not a masichistic one. > > I'm innovative and look the the untired ways - what works. Tradition for it's own sake can be ineffective. > > Jai Maa! > Kelly > > > > > Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2003 Report Share Posted October 28, 2003 Thanks for pointing out her name, Annie Sullivan. I forgot it:) I'm glad you see the link, because in so many ways, by conditioning, the disciple is blind deaf and dumb. And at the same time, we can all identify in the story what an effective Guru is vs an ineffective one. I think when the student moves on and feels the Guru failed it certainly can he the disiples lack of committment or trust, absolutely. It can also be the Guru's inabilty to be a really good teacher. Have you ever noticed how some artists can do art beautifuly and some can teach it wonderfully because they have the gift of teaching? Some are better at just doing art. Some better at teaching it. It's the same for Guru's. Some are better at being leaders, but not good at teaching it. It's up to the student to follow or find another teacher to help them with the nitty gritty. I think we all assume the Guru automatically comes equiped with knowing how to teach. This might never be the case with certain Guru's. There might be Guru's who are awesome at teaching disciples but not be viewed as a Guru. It's the art of teaching that I am getting at. Just because the Guru made it to God, doesn't mean he can teach it effectively. We can see this when the disciple leaves the ashram and the Guru threatens that God will leave them or ruin their lives because they are leaving God. (I have see this, yes and it's a horrific sign to see a Guru act this way). I can understand the Guru fustration that he feels the disciple didn't trust him, but I think it can also be lack of teaching skills and I never condone any Guru telling a disciple they are going to curse or place the disciple in hell. So yes, just as the disciple may not trust the Guru's lesson plan, the Guru may not understand the disciple and misunderstand the behavior. So that is what I am meaning. So many display the Guru like one must completely follow the Guru even if he is abusive and if he thinks the disciple deserved it. We see this in families where dad calls children names and mom said they deserved it. I think this thinking is leading the sadhaka and Guru to a dead end. It's this part of the puzzle that no one questions. So, teaching according to how the disciple can hear is very important. Even onlookers might think she is being dispresectful and the Guru behaving irrationally if he has to be unorthodox, but it's up to the Guru and Disciple and hopefully one is learning to trust and the other not resting on Guru laurels. When Brian mentions the affliction that needs to be healed, I see Helen Keller as totally aflicted. The love of Annie, her committment to Helen is what saved Helen. Helen had the affliction. It was up to Annie to build the trust for such an afflicted person. If the Guru see's each disciple as blind deaf and dumb without judgement, the Guru can expand his teaching skills to reach the disciple. After all, Helen's afflictions were natural and the reactions of soceity were part of the wound. Annie had to prove she would not hurt Helen any more before Helen would trust. I'm glad you liked the story. It was my very first book report in 1st grade:) I guess it made an impression:) Jai Maa! Namaste,Kelly nitya_ma <nitya_ma > wrote: Hi Kelly,I think your reference to Annie Sullivan--Helen Keller's teacher--is beautiful.Ever since I was a little girl, I have always loved Anne Sullivan, and wouldread Helen Keller's story over and over because I loved the miracle of their relationship so much! How tireless both were in their own way; but also,if you read the story closely, you will see that until Helen released her old ways to finally pay attention to Annie's persevering teachings, they got no where! Helen fought and fought to stay the way she had been....and it was painful for her parents to watch the struggle, so much so that Annie had to demand their non interference while she began the slow task of teaching Helen discipline--the desire to truly surrender to truth and knowledge.At the same time, Annie had to call upon her own observations of Helen to be a truly excellent teacher, as you point out in a way. But that is not enough, it can't be enough.The "student" or "disciple" or "learner"--whatever you want to call them--has much to sacrifice in order to truly allow the teaching. Sometimes it feels to that "ego" (or the "I"-ness,the one who thinks they know) very painful, even wrong. What a process! Trust is so key.....when I think back again on that relationship between Anne and Helen, trust became the linch pin, andit was on both sides....the student has to face themselves, and let go; the teacher sees beyond overt behavior and gives teaching according to the student's capacity. Both give attention to each other, which as it intensifies becomes true love, which calls for sacrifice and is the impetus for change.When there is that giving and receiving, and giving up and letting go, and so on...how wonderful. Real "magic" then happens. I think many people hop from teacher to teacher in the hopes that "this time,the teacher will understand ME" sometimes not realizing they don't understand themselves yet, and may be unwilling to sacrifice worn out ways of perceiving. Very, very difficult, I believe; but also, the only way to sincerely learn one's self.In the Rudrastadyayai, especially in chapter 8, it is so incredibly told:all is in me--everything! and all depends on the sacrifice, which is in me too.It remains for us to allow ourselves to be shown, or to see.Jai satguru!, Kelly Leeper <blissnout> wrote:> In addendum to my 2 emails regarding Guru and dsciple relationships, I will tell the story of Helen Keller. > > As we all know, Helen Keller was blind. She had various teachers try to teach her and they all gave up. At that time, braile was not invented and they considered blind people as the 'lost cause'. The authorities, due to their lack of insight, judged Helen Keller because of her condition and learning disability.> > Then comes along the Truely Comassionate Guru, who at all costs tries to understand Helen. She did not come to Helen Keller and demand that she learn this way and that and that she have Faith to prove her willingness to learn. Helen Keller wanted to learn, but it took extreme love for the Guru to love her and teach her according to her abilities.> This is where Guru's are no different. All disciples want to learn, that is the nature of most people seeking. If the Guru becomes Authoritarian and considers the disciple a lost cause because the disciple didn't surrender in the exact way the Guru wanted them to, then the Guru is ineffective. What is going to work with this one student? What does she need to hear in order for her to open up? What do I need to cultivate in order to service her the way she will understand? This is when the Guru may beed to behave unorthodox so that the student will learn.> > Here's an example of mine: I failed algebra 2 years in a row, passed the 3rd year with a C. All teachers thought I wasn't studying. They thought I would goof off after school. (Little did they know I was learning Opera 3-4 hours per day) but I would still do 2 hours of algebra at night. I tried so hard and felt so inept that I couldn't understand. > It wasn't until I was 18 that I decided to apply for a teller position at a Bank. My mother said, "OK, Kelly - here are some math problems, basic math, lets see how you do because you will be tested." Mom put some figures down on paper for me. She watched me as I added, subtracted, mulitplied and divided. Then all of a sudden, "Kelly! What are you doing!!!????" You are carrying wrong, honey, don't you know how to carry your numbers over??" Then I said, "Mom, this is the way I always did it. This is how you carry the left over." Then mom said, "No, that is not the way, here let me show you." then she showed me.> > Can you believe all 3 teachers of albegra thought me to be unable to learn and judged me harshly because THEY never saw my math in action? They never looked to find where I was making the mistake, where I didn't understand. Was it my fault? No, it was the teachers. They should be watching to see where the student is not getting it. Instead the assumed I didn't want to learn. It was they who had the teaching disability, they didn't care enough to find out I was dislexic. > > This story relates to the Guru. Disciples want to learn, but if the Guru is who they say they are, then they should have enough compassion to learn what the student will need and enough to give it attention. Helen Keller became great because of her teacher. Her teacher submitted herself to Helen in order to learn from Helen so that she could teach Helen. How many Guru's do that today? From what I see, Guru's think the disciple is the lost cause if they don't 'get it'. That is the sad thing....> > The idea that there are many Guru's but few disciples means the Guru's didn't care enough for the disciple and the disciples had to move on to find another way.> We are all trying our hardest. The last thing a devotee needs to hear is that it's their problem.> > I hope I was heard correctly. I have worked with people at all levels in the business world, from CIO's to the mailroom and I don't treat any of them differently. This goes for Guru's. I will love them, but the relationship needs to be a partnership, not a masichistic one.> > I'm innovative and look the the untired ways - what works. Tradition for it's own sake can be ineffective.> > Jai Maa!> Kelly> > > > > Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney SpearsTo from this group, send an email to:Your use of Groups is subject to the Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2003 Report Share Posted October 30, 2003 Just so you know, Shree Maa and Swamiji are the most compassionate and humble teachers I can imagine. Ardis Kelly Leeper <blissnout > Mon, 27 Oct 2003 12:49:15 -0800 (PST) Helen Keller In addendum to my 2 emails regarding Guru and dsciple relationships, I will tell the story of Helen Keller. As we all know, Helen Keller was blind. She had various teachers try to teach her and they all gave up. At that time, braile was not invented and they considered blind people as the 'lost cause'. The authorities, due to their lack of insight, judged Helen Keller because of her condition and learning disability. Then comes along the Truely Comassionate Guru, who at all costs tries to understand Helen. She did not come to Helen Keller and demand that she learn this way and that and that she have Faith to prove her willingness to learn. Helen Keller wanted to learn, but it took extreme love for the Guru to love her and teach her according to her abilities. This is where Guru's are no different. All disciples want to learn, that is the nature of most people seeking. If the Guru becomes Authoritarian and considers the disciple a lost cause because the disciple didn't surrender in the exact way the Guru wanted them to, then the Guru is ineffective. What is going to work with this one student? What does she need to hear in order for her to open up? What do I need to cultivate in order to service her the way she will understand? This is when the Guru may beed to behave unorthodox so that the student will learn. Here's an example of mine: I failed algebra 2 years in a row, passed the 3rd year with a C. All teachers thought I wasn't studying. They thought I would goof off after school. (Little did they know I was learning Opera 3-4 hours per day) but I would still do 2 hours of algebra at night. I tried so hard and felt so inept that I couldn't understand. It wasn't until I was 18 that I decided to apply for a teller position at a Bank. My mother said, "OK, Kelly - here are some math problems, basic math, lets see how you do because you will be tested." Mom put some figures down on paper for me. She watched me as I added, subtracted, mulitplied and divided. Then all of a sudden, "Kelly! What are you doing!!!????" You are carrying wrong, honey, don't you know how to carry your numbers over??" Then I said, "Mom, this is the way I always did it. This is how you carry the left over." Then mom said, "No, that is not the way, here let me show you." then she showed me. Can you believe all 3 teachers of albegra thought me to be unable to learn and judged me harshly because THEY never saw my math in action? They never looked to find where I was making the mistake, where I didn't understand. Was it my fault? No, it was the teachers. They should be watching to see where the student is not getting it. Instead the assumed I didn't want to learn. It was they who had the teaching disability, they didn't care enough to find out I was dislexic. This story relates to the Guru. Disciples want to learn, but if the Guru is who they say they are, then they should have enough compassion to learn what the student will need and enough to give it attention. Helen Keller became great because of her teacher. Her teacher submitted herself to Helen in order to learn from Helen so that she could teach Helen. How many Guru's do that today? From what I see, Guru's think the disciple is the lost cause if they don't 'get it'. That is the sad thing.... The idea that there are many Guru's but few disciples means the Guru's didn't care enough for the disciple and the disciples had to move on to find another way. We are all trying our hardest. The last thing a devotee needs to hear is that it's their problem. I hope I was heard correctly. I have worked with people at all levels in the business world, from CIO's to the mailroom and I don't treat any of them differently. This goes for Guru's. I will love them, but the relationship needs to be a partnership, not a masichistic one. I'm innovative and look the the untired ways - what works. Tradition for it's own sake can be ineffective. Jai Maa! Kelly Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears <http://launch./video/?1093432&fs=1&redirectURL=http://launch./promos/britneyspears/> Sponsor Terms of Service <> . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2003 Report Share Posted October 30, 2003 Nitya Ma, Jaya Jaya Satguru. Jaya Jaya Jagadguru! You are so blessed to be in the company of Shree Maa and Swamiji! Ardis "nitya_ma" <nitya_ma > Tue, 28 Oct 2003 09:14:50 -0000 Re: Helen Keller Hi Kelly, I think your reference to Annie Sullivan--Helen Keller's teacher--is beautiful. Ever since I was a little girl, I have always loved Anne Sullivan, and would read Helen Keller's story over and over because I loved the miracle of their relationship so much! How tireless both were in their own way; but also, if you read the story closely, you will see that until Helen released her old ways to finally pay attention to Annie's persevering teachings, they got no where! Helen fought and fought to stay the way she had been....and it was painful for her parents to watch the struggle, so much so that Annie had to demand their non interference while she began the slow task of teaching Helen discipline--the desire to truly surrender to truth and knowledge. At the same time, Annie had to call upon her own observations of Helen to be a truly excellent teacher, as you point out in a way. But that is not enough, it can't be enough. The "student" or "disciple" or "learner"--whatever you want to call them-- has much to sacrifice in order to truly allow the teaching. Sometimes it feels to that "ego" (or the "I"-ness,the one who thinks they know) very painful, even wrong. What a process! Trust is so key.....when I think back again on that relationship between Anne and Helen, trust became the linch pin, and it was on both sides....the student has to face themselves, and let go; the teacher sees beyond overt behavior and gives teaching according to the student's capacity. Both give attention to each other, which as it intensifies becomes true love, which calls for sacrifice and is the impetus for change. When there is that giving and receiving, and giving up and letting go, and so on...how wonderful. Real "magic" then happens. I think many people hop from teacher to teacher in the hopes that "this time,the teacher will understand ME" sometimes not realizing they don't understand themselves yet, and may be unwilling to sacrifice worn out ways of perceiving. Very, very difficult, I believe; but also, the only way to sincerely learn one's self. In the Rudrastadyayai, especially in chapter 8, it is so incredibly told: all is in me--everything! and all depends on the sacrifice, which is in me too. It remains for us to allow ourselves to be shown, or to see. Jai satguru! , Kelly Leeper <blissnout> wrote: > In addendum to my 2 emails regarding Guru and dsciple relationships, I will tell the story of Helen Keller. > > As we all know, Helen Keller was blind. She had various teachers try to teach her and they all gave up. At that time, braile was not invented and they considered blind people as the 'lost cause'. The authorities, due to their lack of insight, judged Helen Keller because of her condition and learning disability. > > Then comes along the Truely Comassionate Guru, who at all costs tries to understand Helen. She did not come to Helen Keller and demand that she learn this way and that and that she have Faith to prove her willingness to learn. Helen Keller wanted to learn, but it took extreme love for the Guru to love her and teach her according to her abilities. > This is where Guru's are no different. All disciples want to learn, that is the nature of most people seeking. If the Guru becomes Authoritarian and considers the disciple a lost cause because the disciple didn't surrender in the exact way the Guru wanted them to, then the Guru is ineffective. What is going to work with this one student? What does she need to hear in order for her to open up? What do I need to cultivate in order to service her the way she will understand? This is when the Guru may beed to behave unorthodox so that the student will learn. > > Here's an example of mine: I failed algebra 2 years in a row, passed the 3rd year with a C. All teachers thought I wasn't studying. They thought I would goof off after school. (Little did they know I was learning Opera 3-4 hours per day) but I would still do 2 hours of algebra at night. I tried so hard and felt so inept that I couldn't understand. > It wasn't until I was 18 that I decided to apply for a teller position at a Bank. My mother said, "OK, Kelly - here are some math problems, basic math, lets see how you do because you will be tested." Mom put some figures down on paper for me. She watched me as I added, subtracted, mulitplied and divided. Then all of a sudden, "Kelly! What are you doing!!!????" You are carrying wrong, honey, don't you know how to carry your numbers over??" Then I said, "Mom, this is the way I always did it. This is how you carry the left over." Then mom said, "No, that is not the way, here let me show you." then she showed me. > > Can you believe all 3 teachers of albegra thought me to be unable to learn and judged me harshly because THEY never saw my math in action? They never looked to find where I was making the mistake, where I didn't understand. Was it my fault? No, it was the teachers. They should be watching to see where the student is not getting it. Instead the assumed I didn't want to learn. It was they who had the teaching disability, they didn't care enough to find out I was dislexic. > > This story relates to the Guru. Disciples want to learn, but if the Guru is who they say they are, then they should have enough compassion to learn what the student will need and enough to give it attention. Helen Keller became great because of her teacher. Her teacher submitted herself to Helen in order to learn from Helen so that she could teach Helen. How many Guru's do that today? From what I see, Guru's think the disciple is the lost cause if they don't 'get it'. That is the sad thing.... > > The idea that there are many Guru's but few disciples means the Guru's didn't care enough for the disciple and the disciples had to move on to find another way. > We are all trying our hardest. The last thing a devotee needs to hear is that it's their problem. > > I hope I was heard correctly. I have worked with people at all levels in the business world, from CIO's to the mailroom and I don't treat any of them differently. This goes for Guru's. I will love them, but the relationship needs to be a partnership, not a masichistic one. > > I'm innovative and look the the untired ways - what works. Tradition for it's own sake can be ineffective. > > Jai Maa! > Kelly > > > > > Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears Sponsor Terms of Service <> . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.