Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

What I meant by not react...

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

oment would have been broken for them and consciousness would have

flowed through them possibly demonstrate to the boatman that the Guru

is obviously a very good teacher because the boatman's button pressing

habit did not affect these true disciples. Swamiji has told me I am

here to learn and here to teach. That is all I intend. Sincerely,

BrianNo banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.Make My Way your home on the

Web - http://www.myway.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

om shanti om, fellow traveler ...

 

steve

 

 

, "Brian McKee" <brian@s...> wrote:

> There has been some misunderstanding about what I meant by non-

reaction so I'd like to clarify. Consciousness is a watcher for the

most part, she is watching me now as I type this, letting my mind

attempt to explain what she has taught me. She will only guide me

when I need guidance and only when I find the stillness to listen.

The first step on my spiritual path was to recognize that i am (ego

is) the cause of my own suffering, to that end I began to mentally

disassemble my habits to understand how I sabbotaged myself. My

first lesson was the recognition that I posess certain qualities,

handed down from my parents, grand parents, etc which cause me to

mentally, emotionally and sometimes physically react to certain

kinds of stimulous. I call these stimulous "buttons" and I call

people who deliberately press them "button pressers." There are

inumerable reasons why people press buttons on purpose, but I will

add this: people who press buttons are usually unconsciously doing

so, even if they think they are doing it in awareness, they are not,

because ego awareness is not awareness itself. That is the same as

analogy of the ship with no captain. At first, after my discovery of

my buttons, I attempted to create thoughts and habits that prevented

me from reacting to the buttons. This in effect created more buttons

and made matters worse. I didn't know that at first because I had

some success. After all, emulating consciousness at the mental level

does have positive effects. It gets the goddess' attention and she

grants us our first boon, to be king of the three worlds, to have

the ego in charge of all the thoughts, to be the head of this little

empire we call a body. But after a while these interceptor thoughts

began to out number the good thoughts, and I lost myself in a sea of

mental confusion. I had so many interceptors battling buttons and

their reactions that I was actually farther away from goddess. She

knew that, but it took some time before I realized it. This was my

intelectual phase of identification. It couldn't last long for me

because my buttons are numerous. For people less afflicted it is

easy to create "police" thoughts and keep things in relative

harmony. Those people will hang out in intelectualism for a while,

until they begin to actually feel the goddess within them, then

personal crisis will set in, the same personal crisis I had when I

realized that my thoughts were entirely out of control. When I talk

about not reacting, I mean feeling the button press, feeling the

emotions and thoughts that flood outward because we have been

programmed by our ancestors to have them, but simply not reacting to

any of it. In order to not react we must not identify with our

buttons; the emotions, thoughts or actions created; or the hurt we

feel. We must identify with goddess. Non-reaction means conscious

acceptance / conscious understanding / wisdom. It is during those

moments that we feel the most anguish and pain, and it is through

that pain that we can begin to recognize the stillness of her grace.

By seeking her, instead of acting out in the same old pattern, we

break the cycle of reaction begets reaction, and allow consciousness

to flood the situation. The two disciples had opposite afflictions:

one was anger violent and the other was passive agressive. They are

the same affliction but one is extroverted and the other is

introverted. One tends to hurt others and the other tends to hurt

the self. (From her perspective its the same thing, and that is

Karma) To be conscious in a test moment -- Maha Maya's moment, the

time when she can be perceived directly -- the disciples would have

had to let go of their reactions to the boatman and feel the pain of

the truth, that they are afflicted, that their minds are NOT at

peace. Through the recognition that they are not at peace, they

would have found peace and Maya's illusion of the moment would have

been broken for them and consciousness would have flowed through

them possibly demonstrate to the boatman that the Guru is obviously

a very good teacher because the boatman's butt

> on pressing habit did not affect these true disciples. Swamiji

has told me I am here to learn and here to teach. That is all I

intend. Sincerely, Brian

>

> _____________

> No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.

> Make My Way your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...