Guest guest Posted October 28, 2004 Report Share Posted October 28, 2004 Hello All, I think Swamiji must've been distracted. While the images on that link are misleading, the text is descriptively accurate. I have had this conversation with Swamiji before, and it seems that as he was taught the names siddhasana and swastikasana were used interchangeably. The difficulty is that all the major yoga schools here in the States (at least) accept the Hatha Yoga Pradipika as the primary source of authority, and the two names belong to different asans in that tradition. Whether called siddhasana (correct according to HYP) or swastikasana (incorrect according to HYP), the asana Swamiji means is the one where the heel is placed firmly against the perineum, and the other heel above it. Chris , "Latha Nanda" <lathananda> wrote: > > > Question from Latha: > I thought Siddhasan and Swastikasan were one and the same, but > per this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asana they are different. > Can you please let me know if it is Siddhasan or Swastikasan > that you recommend as the preferred pose. Thank you for your time > > Swamiji's response : > According to the tradition I studied under, some the asanas in this > link have different names. According to this link the Svastik and > Siddha asanas differ in which leg is placed on top. We never made > such a distinction, but we always placed the right leg on top, so > that would be the Siddhasana according to this. > > Also the poses depicted here for the Virasana and Vajrasana are > different from what is described in the Devi Gita. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2004 Report Share Posted October 28, 2004 Is that right? When I've sat with Swamiji in person some years back, what he said went more in line with what is traditionally known as Swastikasana here for the most part. - Chris Kirner Thursday, October 28, 2004 2:25 PM Re: Q&A with Swamiji .....195...Swastikasan and Siddhasan Hello All,I think Swamiji must've been distracted.While the images on that link are misleading, the text isdescriptively accurate.I have had this conversation with Swamiji before, and it seems that ashe was taught the names siddhasana and swastikasana were usedinterchangeably.The difficulty is that all the major yoga schools here in the States(at least) accept the Hatha Yoga Pradipika as the primary source ofauthority, and the two names belong to different asans in that tradition.Whether called siddhasana (correct according to HYP) or swastikasana(incorrect according to HYP), the asana Swamiji means is the one wherethe heel is placed firmly against the perineum, and the other heelabove it.Chris--- In , "Latha Nanda" <lathananda> wrote:> > > Question from Latha:> I thought Siddhasan and Swastikasan were one and the same, but> per this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asana they are different.> Can you please let me know if it is Siddhasan or Swastikasan> that you recommend as the preferred pose. Thank you for your time> > Swamiji's response :> According to the tradition I studied under, some the asanas in this > link have different names. According to this link the Svastik and > Siddha asanas differ in which leg is placed on top. We never made > such a distinction, but we always placed the right leg on top, so > that would be the Siddhasana according to this.> > Also the poses depicted here for the Virasana and Vajrasana are > different from what is described in the Devi Gita. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2004 Report Share Posted October 28, 2004 Dear Chris, I agree with you on the description of the postures in accordance with the names as presented in the Hatha Yoga Pradipika, but when I was around Swamiji, I saw him go into what was much closer to the Swastikasana. One foot was placed mostly directed downward on one thigh and he would pull the other foot up on the other thigh - with out the heels centered as Siddhasana is usually described. And though he suggested either Padmasana or Swastikasana, I expect that he would be fine with traditional Siddhasana as well. Jayadeva , "Mahamuni" <mahamuni@c...> wrote: > Is that right? When I've sat with Swamiji in person some years back, what he said went more in line with what is traditionally known as Swastikasana here for the most part. > - > Chris Kirner > > Thursday, October 28, 2004 2:25 PM > Re: Q&A with Swamiji .....195...Swastikasan and Siddhasan > > > > > Hello All, > > I think Swamiji must've been distracted. > > While the images on that link are misleading, the text is > descriptively accurate. > > I have had this conversation with Swamiji before, and it seems that as > he was taught the names siddhasana and swastikasana were used > interchangeably. > > The difficulty is that all the major yoga schools here in the States > (at least) accept the Hatha Yoga Pradipika as the primary source of > authority, and the two names belong to different asans in that tradition. > > Whether called siddhasana (correct according to HYP) or swastikasana > (incorrect according to HYP), the asana Swamiji means is the one where > the heel is placed firmly against the perineum, and the other heel > above it. > > Chris > > > , "Latha Nanda" <lathananda> wrote: > > > > > > Question from Latha: > > I thought Siddhasan and Swastikasan were one and the same, but > > per this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asana they are different. > > Can you please let me know if it is Siddhasan or Swastikasan > > that you recommend as the preferred pose. Thank you for your time > > > > Swamiji's response : > > According to the tradition I studied under, some the asanas in this > > link have different names. According to this link the Svastik and > > Siddha asanas differ in which leg is placed on top. We never made > > such a distinction, but we always placed the right leg on top, so > > that would be the Siddhasana according to this. > > > > Also the poses depicted here for the Virasana and Vajrasana are > > different from what is described in the Devi Gita. > Sponsor > > Will you help a needy child? > · It only costs .60¢ a day · It's easier than you think. > · Click here to meet a waiting child you can sponsor now. > - ----------- > Links > > > / > > b.. > > > c.. Terms of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2004 Report Share Posted October 29, 2004 omjayadeva, what about the holding of the hands, did maa and swamiji hold them in mudras during meditation. s , "Jayadeva" <omjayadeva> wrote: > > > Dear Chris, > I agree with you on the description of the postures in accordance > with the names as presented in the Hatha Yoga Pradipika, but when I > was around Swamiji, I saw him go into what was much closer to the > Swastikasana. One foot was placed mostly directed downward on one > thigh and he would pull the other foot up on the other thigh - with > out the heels centered as Siddhasana is usually described. > And though he suggested either Padmasana or Swastikasana, I expect > that he would be fine with traditional Siddhasana as well. > Jayadeva > > , "Mahamuni" <mahamuni@c...> wrote: > > Is that right? When I've sat with Swamiji in person some years > back, what he said went more in line with what is traditionally > known as Swastikasana here for the most part. > > - > > Chris Kirner > > > > Thursday, October 28, 2004 2:25 PM > > Re: Q&A with > Swamiji .....195...Swastikasan and Siddhasan > > > > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > I think Swamiji must've been distracted. > > > > While the images on that link are misleading, the text is > > descriptively accurate. > > > > I have had this conversation with Swamiji before, and it seems > that as > > he was taught the names siddhasana and swastikasana were used > > interchangeably. > > > > The difficulty is that all the major yoga schools here in the > States > > (at least) accept the Hatha Yoga Pradipika as the primary source > of > > authority, and the two names belong to different asans in that > tradition. > > > > Whether called siddhasana (correct according to HYP) or > swastikasana > > (incorrect according to HYP), the asana Swamiji means is the one > where > > the heel is placed firmly against the perineum, and the other > heel > > above it. > > > > Chris > > > > > > , "Latha Nanda" > <lathananda> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Question from Latha: > > > I thought Siddhasan and Swastikasan were one and the same, but > > > per this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asana they are > different. > > > Can you please let me know if it is Siddhasan or Swastikasan > > > that you recommend as the preferred pose. Thank you for your > time > > > > > > Swamiji's response : > > > According to the tradition I studied under, some the asanas in > this > > > link have different names. According to this link the Svastik > and > > > Siddha asanas differ in which leg is placed on top. We never > made > > > such a distinction, but we always placed the right leg on top, > so > > > that would be the Siddhasana according to this. > > > > > > Also the poses depicted here for the Virasana and Vajrasana > are > > > different from what is described in the Devi Gita. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > Will you help a needy child? > > · It only costs .60¢ a day · It's > easier than you think. > > · Click here to meet a waiting > child you can sponsor now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------- -- > ----------- > > Links > > > > > > / > > > > b.. > > > > > > c.. Terms > of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2004 Report Share Posted October 29, 2004 I would echo this. - Steve Connor Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:34 PM Re: Q&A with Swamiji .....195...Swastikasan and Siddhasan omjayadeva, what about the holding of the hands, did maa and swamiji hold them in mudras during meditation.s--- In , "Jayadeva" <omjayadeva> wrote:> > > Dear Chris,> I agree with you on the description of the postures in accordance > with the names as presented in the Hatha Yoga Pradipika, but when I > was around Swamiji, I saw him go into what was much closer to the > Swastikasana. One foot was placed mostly directed downward on one > thigh and he would pull the other foot up on the other thigh - with > out the heels centered as Siddhasana is usually described.> And though he suggested either Padmasana or Swastikasana, I expect > that he would be fine with traditional Siddhasana as well.> Jayadeva> > , "Mahamuni" <mahamuni@c...> wrote:> > Is that right? When I've sat with Swamiji in person some years > back, what he said went more in line with what is traditionally > known as Swastikasana here for the most part.> > - > > Chris Kirner > > To: > > Thursday, October 28, 2004 2:25 PM> > Re: Q&A with > Swamiji ......195...Swastikasan and Siddhasan> > > > > > > > > > Hello All,> > > > I think Swamiji must've been distracted.> > > > While the images on that link are misleading, the text is> > descriptively accurate.> > > > I have had this conversation with Swamiji before, and it seems > that as> > he was taught the names siddhasana and swastikasana were used> > interchangeably.> > > > The difficulty is that all the major yoga schools here in the > States> > (at least) accept the Hatha Yoga Pradipika as the primary source > of> > authority, and the two names belong to different asans in that > tradition.> > > > Whether called siddhasana (correct according to HYP) or > swastikasana> > (incorrect according to HYP), the asana Swamiji means is the one > where> > the heel is placed firmly against the perineum, and the other > heel> > above it.> > > > Chris> > > > > > , "Latha Nanda" > <lathananda> wrote:> > > > > > > > > Question from Latha:> > > I thought Siddhasan and Swastikasan were one and the same, but> > > per this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asana they are > different.> > > Can you please let me know if it is Siddhasan or Swastikasan> > > that you recommend as the preferred pose. Thank you for your > time> > > > > > Swamiji's response :> > > According to the tradition I studied under, some the asanas in > this > > > link have different names. According to this link the Svastik > and > > > Siddha asanas differ in which leg is placed on top. We never > made > > > such a distinction, but we always placed the right leg on top, > so > > > that would be the Siddhasana according to this.> > > > > > Also the poses depicted here for the Virasana and Vajrasana > are > > > different from what is described in the Devi Gita.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > Will you help a needy child? > > · It only costs .60¢ a day· It's > easier than you think. > > · Click here to meet a waiting > child you can sponsor now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -> -----------> > Links> > > > a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:> > /> > > > b.. To from this group, send an email to:> > > > > > c.. Your use of is subject to the Terms > of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2004 Report Share Posted October 29, 2004 Jayadeva, I've seen Swamiji sit in half-lotus frequently at the retreats I've attended. He just seems to find it a comfortable asana. When he is practicing, though, he says he prefers swastikasana (siddhasana). As he said in his most recent post, he makes no distinction as to which foot is placed above the other, but he has communicated to me (through Devnatha) that the heel is placed against the perineum. Chris , "Jayadeva" <omjayadeva> wrote: > > > Dear Chris, > I agree with you on the description of the postures in accordance > with the names as presented in the Hatha Yoga Pradipika, but when I > was around Swamiji, I saw him go into what was much closer to the > Swastikasana. One foot was placed mostly directed downward on one > thigh and he would pull the other foot up on the other thigh - with > out the heels centered as Siddhasana is usually described. > And though he suggested either Padmasana or Swastikasana, I expect > that he would be fine with traditional Siddhasana as well. > Jayadeva > > , "Mahamuni" <mahamuni@c...> wrote: > > Is that right? When I've sat with Swamiji in person some years > back, what he said went more in line with what is traditionally > known as Swastikasana here for the most part. > > - > > Chris Kirner > > > > Thursday, October 28, 2004 2:25 PM > > Re: Q&A with > Swamiji .....195...Swastikasan and Siddhasan > > > > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > I think Swamiji must've been distracted. > > > > While the images on that link are misleading, the text is > > descriptively accurate. > > > > I have had this conversation with Swamiji before, and it seems > that as > > he was taught the names siddhasana and swastikasana were used > > interchangeably. > > > > The difficulty is that all the major yoga schools here in the > States > > (at least) accept the Hatha Yoga Pradipika as the primary source > of > > authority, and the two names belong to different asans in that > tradition. > > > > Whether called siddhasana (correct according to HYP) or > swastikasana > > (incorrect according to HYP), the asana Swamiji means is the one > where > > the heel is placed firmly against the perineum, and the other > heel > > above it. > > > > Chris > > > > > > , "Latha Nanda" > <lathananda> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Question from Latha: > > > I thought Siddhasan and Swastikasan were one and the same, but > > > per this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asana they are > different. > > > Can you please let me know if it is Siddhasan or Swastikasan > > > that you recommend as the preferred pose. Thank you for your > time > > > > > > Swamiji's response : > > > According to the tradition I studied under, some the asanas in > this > > > link have different names. According to this link the Svastik > and > > > Siddha asanas differ in which leg is placed on top. We never > made > > > such a distinction, but we always placed the right leg on top, > so > > > that would be the Siddhasana according to this. > > > > > > Also the poses depicted here for the Virasana and Vajrasana > are > > > different from what is described in the Devi Gita. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor > > > > Will you help a needy child? > > · It only costs .60¢ a day · It's > easier than you think. > > · Click here to meet a waiting > child you can sponsor now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > ----------- > > Links > > > > > > / > > > > b.. > > > > > > c.. Terms > of Service. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.