Guest guest Posted March 7, 1999 Report Share Posted March 7, 1999 > I was implying that the shake-up provides the jolt, the wake-up call. No > other convincing is necessary at that point. For instance, I predict that > this phenomena of youth violence is going to expand and escalate until we > are forced to really focus on the issue by implementing careful study, by > various thinktanks. Or the results will start coming in from the efforts of > grassroots humanitarian activist groups shedding light on what the problem > is. I believe much information will arise from discoveries made in that > arena which could have a reverberating positive effect felt throughout our > society. Or, of course, the problem could still get worse before it gets > better. Just like us as individuals. Some of us have to hit rock bottom > before we see the light. Only our experience convinces us. > > Connie > Yes. Connie, you are right. Youth violence 'is' expanding and the 'thinktanks' are failing us on all levels of society. Too much 'thinking' I believe. Consider the models that I have developed 'my' grassroot humanitarian effort. I am not obliged to share them until such time as the 'thinktanks' release their control. It is these very 'thinktanks' that label us as mentally ill, fanatics, rebels, outcasts, looney, unstable, and unbalanced... the list is endless. They see us as a threat and possibly a cause to the youth violence. So, they continue to 'think' for that is their only function. I 'think' that they are not working. I 'think' we need a grassroots humanitarian effort to set things back in a positive direction. This is all the 'thinking' that I need to do. The rest is action and I have a plan. So, until the time comes when our professionals (avatars), experts (gurus), political leaders (buddhas) scientists (madmen) think there last thought in their insulated 'tank' then perhaps we fundamental humanitarians will be given the opportunity to show how it 'works' outside of the tank. Perhaps we have the answers by living as opposed to 'thinking' about the problem. I mean, who's problem is it anyways? Does it belong the mansions of priviledge in the sky? If not, then why do we sit here and wait for their answers? I will continue to try and organize this grassroots movement Connie. We can sqabble about leadership some other time. I have models that work. I have models that do not change existing political, religious, or economic structures. I only hope that when our 'thinktanks' and grassroots humanitarian efforts meet, that they will consider what I have to say. I want to ensure that what I have to say is said on the record. They can throw it in the garbage after that but I wish to be heard and that is the only leadership role that I desire. After that, I will leave politics to the politicians, religion to the religious, professionals to their profession, and scientists to their discoveries. I have no illusion as to my roll here. Nor should you. I did not come to save the world. I came to be heard. I have something to say and once it is said, I want to go home and be a husband, father, son, friend... Regards. Tim Harris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.