Guest guest Posted March 18, 1999 Report Share Posted March 18, 1999 or that such bad habits will drop of THEMSELVES when renunciation of the unreal takes place. Let me quote a few passages from Sri Shankara, a famous jnani. These are all from Viveka-Chudamani (Crest-Jewel Of Discrimination): There is only Chiti, or Shakti. What is unreal about Chiti? Even the mighty veils of Maya which confound the individual as well as the powerful all pervasive Matrka are energies, or power of Chiti. There is no unreal. Where is unreal? Where is unChiti? Bah! Matti! Bhaktananda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 1999 Report Share Posted March 18, 1999 Tim wrote: >I am reminded of the words of Buddha: A true master/chela neither gives >offense, nor does he take it... A true master always gives offense. You can quote me <g> Maurice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 1999 Report Share Posted March 18, 1999 Many spiritual paths involve transformation of the personality. The assumption is that there must be a change in conditioning in order to move ahead. Therefore bad habits should be discarded and good ones cultivated. Certainly we should not discourage people from improving themselves. The Jnana disposition, however, once gained, fundamentally undermines this view by piercing the veil of delusion that there is something to be gained by transforming the personality, which is not already present. Here the intensity of awareness shines naturally. Truly, how can one discard that which does not belong to It? And how can one discard that which One Is? Once the Heart of Attention has fundamentally shifted to Itself, that Itself is the fuel of the effortless effort which eventually burns up leaving nothing behind. When the Ground of Being absorbs all attention and all effort, what is there to discard and how and by whom? Still, I am not opposed to discarding various types of conditioning at all. If you are for it, I am for it. /.cgi/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 1999 Report Share Posted March 18, 1999 Chiti and Shiva are simply the energy of God, who's nature is creative pulsation and movement, and the consciousness of that energy. Shiva is both immanent (in this world) and transcendant. Chiti or Shakti is simply his creative energy (this world). There is nothing that is not his creative energy here. This is his creative energy. How can one seperate flame from heat? Two words for the same thing. Flame is descriptive, heat is action. There is not difference. God and God's energy are the same thing. One can reach the transcendant Supreme Consciousness by realizing that he is in the midst of, is one with, his creative energy. It is not suprising at all that you have not heard of Chiti. Most habitual posters with little knowledge and much opinion are like this. Bad mouth Marcus to death. Matrka does not phase this one in the slightest. That your world is so easily shaken should be a wake up call to you, but it is doubtful. Much Light Marcus Tim Gerchmez <fewtch < > Thursday, March 18, 1999 7:47 PM Re: Heart of Truth Tim Gerchmez <fewtch *Shrug*... before you came on the list, Marcus, I had never even heard the word "Chiti" in my life before, although I had heard of Shakti. But there is nothing but Brahman, Ultimate Reality, Pure Consciousness. The Self is Brahman. Anything else but Brahman is simply part of Brahman, and that is why it is unreal, as a wave is not a "wave," it is ocean. Why call it a wave? This is just a label. It is ocean. A glass jar is not a "jar," it is glass. To label it a "jar," this is the unreal thing. All things are reflections of Brahman. Brahman is the substance of which all things are made. Thus, to label them as something else is why they are unreal. To divide everything into gods and goddesses as you do seems almost a form of polytheism. Whatever turns your crank/makes you happy, you're free to believe, of course. Tim At 12:33 PM 3/18/99 -0000, you wrote: >>>> or that such bad habits will drop of THEMSELVES when renunciation of the unreal takes place. Let me quote a few passages from Sri Shankara, a famous jnani. These are all from Viveka-Chudamani (Crest-Jewel Of Discrimination): There is only Chiti, or Shakti. What is unreal about Chiti? Even the mighty veils of Maya which confound the individual as well as the powerful all pervasive Matrka are energies, or power of Chiti. There is no unreal. Where is unreal? Where is unChiti? Bah! Matti! Bhaktananda <<<< ----- The CORE of Reality awaits you at: http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/ND/index.html - Poetry, Writings, Live Chat on spiritual topics. ------ If you like orange and blue, then you will love our new web site! Onelist: Fostering connections and information exchange Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 1999 Report Share Posted March 18, 1999 At 09:21 AM 3/18/99 -0500, you wrote: >"Harsha (Dr. Harsh K. Luthar)" <hluthar > >Many spiritual paths involve transformation of the personality. The >assumption is that there must be a change in conditioning in order to move >ahead. Therefore bad habits should be discarded and good ones cultivated. >Certainly we should not discourage people from improving themselves. The >Jnana disposition, however, once gained, fundamentally undermines this view >by piercing the veil of delusion that there is something to be gained by >transforming the personality, which is not already present. Here the >intensity of awareness shines naturally. Although jnana yoga (what is "the jnana disposition?") does undermine this assumption that it is necessary to discard bad habits and cultivate good ones (or in fact to "do" ANYTHING but discern Truth from falsehood), it does not undermine the assumption that it is HELPFUL to drop bad habits, etc., or that such bad habits will drop of THEMSELVES when renunciation of the unreal takes place. Let me quote a few passages from Sri Shankara, a famous jnani. These are all from Viveka-Chudamani (Crest-Jewel Of Discrimination): "Right action helps to purify the heart..." "He who tries to find the Atman by feeding the cravings of the body, is trying to cross a river by grasping a crocodile, mistaking it for a log." "Tamas has these further characteristics: ...laziness, dullness... A man who is under their influence cannot understand anything. He lives like a somnambulist, or an unconscious log of wood." "A man must faithfully and devotedly fulfill the duties of life as the scriptures prescribe. This purifies his heart. A man whose heart is pure realizes the supreme Atman." "That terrible tiger called an impure mind prowls in the forest of the sense-objects. The wise man who seeks liberation must not go there." "The sweet fragrance of the Atman is overpowered by innumerable cravings for the things of the senses. These cravings can be destroyed by devotion to the Atman; and then the light of the Atman becomes revealed." "The wise man has not the least concern with getting and spending. Therefore strive to destroy this illusion, through constant and single-minded devotion to Brahman." "The more a man satisfies his cravings in the objective world, the more his cravings will increase. But if he controls them and ceases to gratify them, the seeds of craving will be destroyed. Therefore, let him gain self-control." >Truly, how can one discard that which does not belong to It? And how can one >discard that which One Is? Once the Heart of Attention has fundamentally >shifted to Itself, that Itself is the fuel of the effortless effort which >eventually burns up leaving nothing behind. When the Ground of Being absorbs >all attention and all effort, what is there to discard and how and by whom? >Still, I am not opposed to discarding various types of conditioning at all. >If you are for it, I am for it. Who is "you?" Everyone differs in their viewpoints. Those who follow Shankara's directives to the letter (very few in this day and age, I would assume) will discard EVERYTHING, including the objective universe, in pursuit of nirvikalpa samadhi, and will dwell upon none but Brahman "24/7." Certainly I do not make the claim of living up to this myself, and I cannot speak for anyone but myself. "Let there be no negligence in your devotion to Brahman. Negligence in the practice of recollection is death--this has been declared by the seer, Sanatkumar, Brahma's son." "If the mind turns aside from Brahman, its ideal, and becomes ever so slightly caught in the sensuality of objects, it will continue to go downward, through negligence in recollection, like a ball dropped upon a flight of stairs." "Through negligence in recollection, a man is distracted from awareness of his divine nature. He who is thus distracted falls--and the fallen always come to ruin. It is very hard for them to rise again." Certainly these are difficult passages to live up to without tremendous devotion to Brahman and a tremendous spirit of renunciation. But perhaps you can see that "all conditioning" will drop off of itself, if such perfect recollection is practiced (although a person would almost have to live in a cave to live up to the perfect recollection mentioned in the above passages!). Tim ----- The CORE of Reality awaits you at: http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/ND/index.html - Poetry, Writings, Live Chat on spiritual topics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 1999 Report Share Posted March 18, 1999 Tim Gerchmez <fewtch Let me quote a few passages from Sri Shankara, a famous jnani. These are all from Viveka-Chudamani (Crest-Jewel Of Discrimination): "Right action helps to purify the heart..." "He who tries to find the Atman by feeding the cravings of the body, is trying to cross a river by grasping a crocodile, mistaking it for a log." "A man must faithfully and devotedly fulfill the duties of life as the scriptures prescribe. This purifies his heart. A man whose heart is pure realizes the supreme Atman." "That terrible tiger called an impure mind prowls in the forest of the sense-objects. The wise man who seeks liberation must not go there." "The sweet fragrance of the Atman is overpowered by innumerable cravings for the things of the senses. These cravings can be destroyed by devotion to the Atman; and then the light of the Atman becomes revealed." Harsha: Thank you Tim. I am always grateful to have the opportunity to read the precious gems from Sri Shankra. And Thank you to Ramji as well for his posts on the essence of Vedanta. Indeed, they should be reflected on with great care. It is only with awareness that one seeks awareness. It is only with awareness that awareness is mastered. Ultimately Awareness always rests in its own nature. To seek things other than awareness does not satisfy. To master things other than awareness does not satisfy. Perhaps by Grace, we seek to become aware, and by Grace, Awareness Reveals It Self as Our Own Self. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 1999 Report Share Posted March 18, 1999 *Shrug*... before you came on the list, Marcus, I had never even heard the word "Chiti" in my life before, although I had heard of Shakti. But there is nothing but Brahman, Ultimate Reality, Pure Consciousness. The Self is Brahman. Anything else but Brahman is simply part of Brahman, and that is why it is unreal, as a wave is not a "wave," it is ocean. Why call it a wave? This is just a label. It is ocean. A glass jar is not a "jar," it is glass. To label it a "jar," this is the unreal thing. All things are reflections of Brahman. Brahman is the substance of which all things are made. Thus, to label them as something else is why they are unreal. To divide everything into gods and goddesses as you do seems almost a form of polytheism. Whatever turns your crank/makes you happy, you're free to believe, of course. Tim At 12:33 PM 3/18/99 -0000, you wrote: >>>> or that such bad habits will drop of THEMSELVES when renunciation of the unreal takes place. Let me quote a few passages from Sri Shankara, a famous jnani. These are all from Viveka-Chudamani (Crest-Jewel Of Discrimination): There is only Chiti, or Shakti. What is unreal about Chiti? Even the mighty veils of Maya which confound the individual as well as the powerful all pervasive Matrka are energies, or power of Chiti. There is no unreal. Where is unreal? Where is unChiti? Bah! Matti! Bhaktananda <<<< ----- The CORE of Reality awaits you at: http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/ND/index.html - Poetry, Writings, Live Chat on spiritual topics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 1999 Report Share Posted March 18, 1999 Tim, These lists are for entertainment. You share, have some laughs, turn off the computer and go on your way. A post from Marcus is easily deleted if you do not want any part of it. That a threat is perceived from a post is something that does not occur here, and should not occur anywhere. Post whatever your heart feels like, and likewise here. Delete what you are not interested in. It's for enjoyment; it is not intended to be a social life. Lighten up fella. Much Light Marcus Tim Gerchmez <fewtch < > Thursday, March 18, 1999 11:18 PM Re: Heart of Truth Tim Gerchmez <fewtch Dear Marcus, At 04:21 PM 3/18/99 -0000, you wrote: >>>> It is not suprising at all that you have not heard of Chiti. Most habitual posters with little knowledge and much opinion are like this. Bad mouth Marcus to death. Matrka does not phase this one in the slightest. That your world is so easily shaken should be a wake up call to you, but it is doubtful. Much Light Marcus I have no desire to "bad mouth" you in any way, only to tell you that your beliefs are not everybody's beliefs, and that if you cannot accept that, you are like any religious advocate that closes off all others. This is the reason why the Jews and Muslims fight, why the Christians and Jews fight, this is the reason for all wars and for all conflict in the dualistic religious arena. I will accept your "brand" of nondualism as being right for you. But will you accept mine as being right for me? I am reminded of the words of Buddha: A true master/chela neither gives offense, nor does he take it. Perhaps I diverted from this ideal, and ego entered the picture. If so, my deepest apologies. But you will not sway me to your religious viewpoints, no matter how false you think mine are, or how true you believe yours to be. No amount of talk or convincing will ever do it. Perhaps it would do you good to look at the teaching of Sri Ramakrishna, who found that ALL religions are after the same thing, that God is like a lake, and all these different religions and "sects" are people drinking from different areas of the same lake. With Love, Tim ----- The CORE of Reality awaits you at: http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/ND/index.html - Poetry, Writings, Live Chat on spiritual topics. ------ If you like orange and blue, then you will love our new web site! Onelist: Fostering connections and information exchange Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 1999 Report Share Posted March 18, 1999 Dear Marcus, At 04:21 PM 3/18/99 -0000, you wrote: >>>> It is not suprising at all that you have not heard of Chiti. Most habitual posters with little knowledge and much opinion are like this. Bad mouth Marcus to death. Matrka does not phase this one in the slightest. That your world is so easily shaken should be a wake up call to you, but it is doubtful. Much Light Marcus I have no desire to "bad mouth" you in any way, only to tell you that your beliefs are not everybody's beliefs, and that if you cannot accept that, you are like any religious advocate that closes off all others. This is the reason why the Jews and Muslims fight, why the Christians and Jews fight, this is the reason for all wars and for all conflict in the dualistic religious arena. I will accept your "brand" of nondualism as being right for you. But will you accept mine as being right for me? I am reminded of the words of Buddha: A true master/chela neither gives offense, nor does he take it. Perhaps I diverted from this ideal, and ego entered the picture. If so, my deepest apologies. But you will not sway me to your religious viewpoints, no matter how false you think mine are, or how true you believe yours to be. No amount of talk or convincing will ever do it. Perhaps it would do you good to look at the teaching of Sri Ramakrishna, who found that ALL religions are after the same thing, that God is like a lake, and all these different religions and "sects" are people drinking from different areas of the same lake. With Love, Tim ----- The CORE of Reality awaits you at: http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/ND/index.html - Poetry, Writings, Live Chat on spiritual topics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 19, 1999 Report Share Posted March 19, 1999 Thank you, but if I had to pick between quoting you or the Buddha... No offense, of course... ;-) Tim At 05:08 AM 3/18/99 -0800, you wrote: >"Maurice" <postage > >Tim wrote: > >>I am reminded of the words of Buddha: A true master/chela neither gives >>offense, nor does he take it... > >A true master always gives offense. > >You can quote me <g> > >Maurice ----- The CORE of Reality awaits you at: http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/ND/index.html - Poetry, Writings, Live Chat on spiritual topics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 19, 1999 Report Share Posted March 19, 1999 Dear Marcus, Actually, these lists are for whatever the person using them takes them for. I'm quite aware that a post from Marcus is easily deleted. But Marcus is not to be deleted. Marcus is real, and thus is to be taken and respected as a real person. Now is it YOU telling me that a portion of the world is unreal? (big grin). With Love, Tim At 08:29 PM 3/18/99 -0000, you wrote: >>>> Tim, These lists are for entertainment. You share, have some laughs, turn off the computer and go on your way. A post from Marcus is easily deleted if you do not want any part of it. That a threat is perceived from a post is something that does not occur here, and should not occur anywhere. Post whatever your heart feels like, and likewise here. Delete what you are not interested in. It's for enjoyment; it is not intended to be a social life. Lighten up fella. Much Light Marcus ----- The CORE of Reality awaits you at: http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/ND/index.html - Poetry, Writings, Live Chat on spiritual topics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.