Guest guest Posted April 22, 1999 Report Share Posted April 22, 1999 Gemini, At 01:52 PM 4/22/99 -0000, you wrote: >>>> Marcia, The opinions you quoted were from those who are ignorant of Kundalini. <<<< This is very judgmental of you. Perhaps it is you who had a false experience of Kundalini, maybe it was purely imaginary and it happened because your mind, in desire to experience it, made it happen. To make such a judgment of others without knowing anything about them is immature. >>>> Writers such as you have described lacked the courage to face the worst enemy--the one within. <<<< Once again, it is crude, judgmental, and lacking in common sense to assume that either you or your particular faith (Shaivism) hold any ultimate claims to Truth. You have lost much credibility with me in this posting. Not that you ever had a heck of a lot to begin with. You cling to your particular teaching and particular guru (Nityananda) like an infant clings to its bottle. >>>> Tim ----- Visit The Core of the WWW at: http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/ND/index.html Music, Poetry, Writings on Nondual Spiritual Topics. Tim's Windows and DOS Shareware/Freeware is at: http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/shareware.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 1999 Report Share Posted April 22, 1999 >Marcus: >Marcia, > The opinions you quoted were from those who are ignorant of Kundalini. > >Tim G: >This is very judgmental of you. I think it is the voice of experience. >Tim G. > Perhaps it is you who had a false >experience of Kundalini, maybe it was purely imaginary.... This is like a person who has never had an orgasm telling another person that he may have imagined it... Kundalini is very physical indeed... If someone tried to tell me I only imagined it, what could I do but laugh? >Marcus: >Writers such as you have described lacked the courage to face the worst >enemy--the one within. >Tim G.: >Once again, it is crude, judgmental, and lacking in common sense to assume >that either you or your particular faith (Shaivism) hold any ultimate >claims to Truth. Kundalini is not the sole property of Shaivism... it is universal... it happens to people of all faiths... and of none. Marcus has not claimed that the Kundalini energy/process belongs to his faith alone. He simply offers insights into it. >Tim G: >You have lost much credibility with me in this posting. >Not that you ever had a heck of a lot to begin with. You cling to your >particular teaching and particular guru (Nityananda) like an infant clings >to its bottle. This is uncalled for... rude and crude. We are fortunate to have one who has known Nityananda on this list. Love, Dharma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 22, 1999 Report Share Posted April 22, 1999 At 12:34 AM 4/22/99 -0500, you wrote: >Dharma <fisher1 >This is uncalled for... rude and crude. In the style of Bruce Morgen, "Opinion noted." >We are fortunate to have one who has known Nityananda on this list. Why? Who is "we?" Nityananda is nobody to me. Who do you speak for? Tim ----- Visit The Core of the WWW at: http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/ND/index.html Music, Poetry, Writings on Nondual Spiritual Topics. Tim's Windows and DOS Shareware/Freeware is at: http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/shareware.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.