Harsha/Digest Number 146, and use of language.

[Guest guest]

The message <3.0.6.32.19921021122551.00797740

from Jill Eggers <eggers contains these words:

 

> Jill Eggers <eggers

> At 01:25 AM 5/12/99 +0100, jb wrote:

> >"jb" <kvy9

> >

> >> "Hans Deunhouwer" <ja.deunhouwer

> >>[...]

> > Can there be thinking without language ?

> >> I am looking forward to your thoughts about this.

 

Dear friends

 

I have memory of an early experiece.

I was a baby at the crawling probably tottering stage, and I crawled

all the way up the stairs to the landing, my Mum saw me amd as was

her way paniced.

I remember very clearly thinking whats all the fuss about I got up

here myself I can go the rest of the way up myself and proceeded to

escape the grasp of my mum. The point is I should not have been

capable of expressng though in language at that time but my memory

impression of it is very clear. I accept that going back to the

memory I might have carried language with me. However the "thoughts"

I am sure were original.

At one time I played in a band and my memory was not that good ie I

had to be told which key we were going to be in before each number

started but once the first note was played I was away in full flight.

I played bass guitar and seemed to remember " process thoughts" by

emotion and moving shapes to represent the structure I used for any

particular song.

When we were getting a new hit record off I had not perhaps heard the

bass part but it seemed to sugest it self to me from what the rest

were playing.

I played 4/5 nights a week and no doubt about it there was a

telepathic exchange in the group, new ways of phrasing parts would

come out of the ether spontaniously to us. It was an icredible experience.

When my first wife had twins I got the birth pains.

 

We are One if we care to acknowledge it.

 

Language is very clever. I did Hypnotherapy training and as part of

the course read about deep structure of a sentence. So much is not

actually said but implied or sugested, hence we can get the wrong end

of the stick.

Even if you have not heard that phrase before you can intute its

meaning because of the structure of the sentence before.

Similarly in the two is inherent the third "Holy Trinity"

In Tantric the two become one to realize the Third.

Our friend Harsha is fond of reminding us of the "who is asking whom"

who is it who asks etc

our spoken/written language is but a tool perhaps 80% of language is

nonverbal so it is a miracle that this list is relatively peaceful

when there is only 20% of the comunication coming accross in e mail.

So thats my though for today. I ration myself!!! Thinking is dangerous.

Laughing

Love Chris

Sai Ram