Guest guest Posted May 18, 1999 Report Share Posted May 18, 1999 Hi, I would like to share an experience I had and ask for enlightenment from list members. I met a young lady last year in China and was with her for a few days. She and her acquaintances claimed that she had been in total fast for 5 years and was still fasting, as an involuntary and unintentional result from Qi Gong practice. She only drank a bit of water. A few more people also told me that they had total fast too, but lasting only from a few days to a few weeks. Again, as result from Qi Gong practice I am still skeptical, but there were no motives for them to fabricate it if there is no truth to it. Welcome any wisdom from you all. Best health, Sam. _____________ Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 1999 Report Share Posted May 18, 1999 I understand your logic Jan but it's not quite that simple. See when you exercise correctly you raise your metabolic rate (during & resting) & no one up on the science refutes the fact that proper exercise *extends* life. Stay Healthy, David Harsha: Thanks Jan and David for the great lessons on nutrition. Thanks also for sharing the example of your sister David. Perhaps you can explain more of the ionized protein powders. I had not heard of them. I have heard of scientific experiments with mice where the mice fed a starvation diet lived a much longer life. It is also well known that people who fast periodically tend to live longer. A couple of decades ago, I came across a book by Paul Bragg on fasting. Jan had mentioned it once as well. The book was very impressive as Paul Bragg himself fasted off and on throughout his life. I believe he lived a pretty healthy life into his 90s. Fasting is a well known practice in Yogic traditions. Diets are of course unique to individuals and this is something to keep in my mind as Idris suggested. But it is nice to know different ideas on nutrition that are out there. Perhaps we can help Jerry make a better smoothie every morning. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 1999 Report Share Posted May 18, 1999 Harsha (Dr. Harsh K. Luthar) wrote: <snip> >Diets are of course unique to individuals and > this is something to keep in my mind as Idris suggested. But it is nice to > know different ideas on nutrition that are out there. Perhaps we can help > Jerry make a better smoothie every morning. > Mornin Harsha, I remembered in the middle of the night how the saying really is supposed to go. "It is not what goes in to a man that defiles him but what comes out." Better huh? :-) Marcia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 1999 Report Share Posted May 18, 1999 Mornin Harsha, I remembered in the middle of the night how the saying really is supposed to go. "It is not what goes in to a man that defiles him but what comes out." Better huh? :-) Marcia Harsha: Thanks Marcia for your wisdom. Perhaps you can elaborate a bit more on the meaning. What comes out of a man (woman) could also be interpreted to purify him/her. Usually people feel better after answering calls of nature and emptying themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 1999 Report Share Posted May 18, 1999 On Tue, 18 May 1999 15:40:50 -0400 "Harsha (Dr. Harsh K. Luthar)" <hluthar writes: >"Harsha (Dr. Harsh K. Luthar)" <hluthar > >Mornin Harsha, > >I remembered in the middle of the night how the saying really is >supposed to >go. >"It is not what goes in to a man that defiles him but what comes >out." >Better huh? :-) >Marcia > > >Harsha: Thanks Marcia for your wisdom. Perhaps you can elaborate a bit >more on the meaning. What comes out of a man (woman) could also be >interpreted to >purify him/her. Usually people feel better after answering calls of >nature and emptying themselves. > As Capt. Jean-Luc Picard might put it, "Let's end this charade." The aphorism goes something like this, paraphrasing J. Krishnamurti's response to a listener who insisted on penultimate importance of vegetarianism: "You would do well, sir, to be less concerned with what goes into your mouth and more aware of what comes out." http://www.users.uniserve.com/~samuel/brucemrg.htm http://www.users.uniserve.com/~samuel/brucsong.htm m(_ _)m _ _________________ You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 1999 Report Share Posted May 18, 1999 Harsha (Dr. Harsh K. Luthar) wrote: >Harsha: Thanks Marcia for your wisdom. Perhaps you can elaborate a bit more > on the meaning. What comes out of a man (woman) could also be interpreted to > purify him/her. Usually people feel better after answering calls of nature > and emptying themselves. Marcia: It isn't literal. It is supposed to a play on words. You are supposed to think that it means exactly what you think and then realize that it can't mean that. People give out emanations. They have atmospheres just like the earth. It doesn't come from what they eat in the organic sense anyway. Some people are a natural center of gravity and have drawing power. Others seem to repel. It comes from the psychological country they inhabit. On that note emanations attract and repel according to type but some people (gurus and so forth) have such drawing power that they only attract unless they choose otherwise. "Views from the Real World, Early Talks of Gurdjieff" "To free oneself of chemico-physical influences, one has to be passive. I repeat, these are the influences which are due to the emanations of the atmosphere of the body, of feeling, of thought, and in some people also of ether. To be able to resist these influences one has to be passive. Then one can become a little freer of them. The law of attraction operates here. Like attracts like. That is, everything goes toward the place where there is more of the same kind. To him who has much, more is given. From him who has little, even that is taken away. If I am calm, my emanations are heavy so other emanations come to me and I can absorb them, as much as I have room for. But if I am agitated I have not enough emanations, for they are going out to others. If emanations come to me, they occupy empty places, for they are necessary where there is a vacuum. Emanations remain where there is calm, where there is no friction, where there is an empty place. If there is no room, if everything is full, emanations may hit against me but they rebound or pass by. If I am calm, I have an empty place so I can receive them; but if I am full they do not trouble me. So I am ensured in either case." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 1999 Report Share Posted May 18, 1999 >Harsha: Thanks Marcia for your wisdom. Perhaps you can elaborate a bit >more on the meaning. What comes out of a man (woman) could also be >interpreted to >purify him/her. Usually people feel better after answering calls of >nature and emptying themselves. > As Capt. Jean-Luc Picard might put it, "Let's end this charade." The aphorism goes something like this, paraphrasing J. Krishnamurti's response to a listener who insisted on penultimate importance of vegetarianism: "You would do well, sir, to be less concerned with what goes into your mouth and more aware of what comes out." Harsha: Thank you Sri Bruceji Maharaj. This will require some digestion. We shall see soon what comes out from Marcia's end. It is possible Marcia was using a different variation of this with a subtle play on words and it is not meant to be taken literally. So yet still another meaning may be possible. These food metaphors! So rich and earthy, and yet they convey so much subtlety with such grace :--). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 1999 Report Share Posted May 18, 1999 Marcia Paul [jacpa] Tuesday, May 18, 1999 4:01 PM Re: Mice and Men/Scientifically sound and Spiritual Diets Marcia Paul <jacpa Harsha (Dr. Harsh K. Luthar) wrote: >Harsha: Thanks Marcia for your wisdom. Perhaps you can elaborate a bit more > on the meaning. What comes out of a man (woman) could also be interpreted to > purify him/her. Usually people feel better after answering calls of nature > and emptying themselves. Marcia: It isn't literal. It is supposed to a play on words. You are supposed to think that it means exactly what you think and then realize that it can't mean that......... My apologies Marcia. I was just having fun. Sorry. Harsha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 1999 Report Share Posted May 18, 1999 Harsha (Dr. Harsh K. Luthar) wrote: >My apologies Marcia. I was just having fun. Sorry. Marcia: You are a sly one. You mean the joke was really on me? :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 1999 Report Share Posted May 18, 1999 "Harsha (Dr. Harsh K. Luthar)" wrote: > I understand your logic Jan but it's not quite that simple. See when you > exercise correctly you raise your metabolic rate (during & resting) & no one > up on the science refutes the fact that proper exercise *extends* life. > Stay Healthy, > David > > Harsha: Thanks Jan and David for the great lessons on nutrition. You are quite welcome. > Perhaps you can explain more > of the ionized protein powders. I had not heard of them. Here's what you want. Ionic-exchanged whey protein isolate. The benefits are not only enormous but exclusive only to this form. Don't go for whey protein concentrate. Not bad stuff. In fact it's what ionic-exchanged whey is made from. Whey concentrate is selected because it contains all the aminos in the correct proportion *&* then it's run through an enzymatic bath which produces all those di & tripeptides (there's some in foods too but not to the same extent.) which are chemical keys that trigger physiological responses in the body that are enormously healthy. 1. Immunity is enhanced by up to 500%. Whey is now used in treatment of cancer & other immune debilitating diseases in fact. 2. Insulin metabolism is optimized. 3.The BV (biological value) is the highest known. BV is the amount of protein retained in the body per gram absorbed. It scores a 159. Whey concentrate 104. Whole egg 100. Milk 91. Fish 83. Beef 80. Chicken 79. Soy 74. Rice 59. Wheat 54. Beans 49. Forget about fruit as a protein source. 4. Fat free. 5. Contains a lot of alanine & the branched chain aminos. 6. Cause sustained increases in glutathione, one of your most important anti oxidants and confers resistance to a variety of diseases & carcinogens. 7. Optimizes hormonal health. (I'll stop for now, tho I've just started) If anyone wants a link to the cheapest place to get it let me know.) > I have heard of scientific experiments with mice where the mice fed a starvation diet > lived > a much longer life. What does this mean? Well, it means the mice were being overfed to their detriment previously with regard to the amount of energy they could expend. To say eat less and leave it there is really doesn't mean much. Less than what? We know with humans as one's *bodyfat percentage* rises so do the disease rates. Bodyfat is by far our worst health risk. It cause more illness than all the environmental & nutrition problems, than smoking, alcohol & all other drugs put together. Infinitely worse than over-publicized AIDS. Some quick facts: 1. Over weight (eating excesses) accounts for 25% of the deaths caused by cancer in the US. 2. A 10% increase above ideal body fat percentage cause a 6% increase in blood pressure. 3. With 50 extra lbs risk of hypertension increases to 700%. 4. What medical & insurance companies consider 'normal' for bodyfat increases cardiovascular risk in women 400%. 5. Very moderate overweight increases chance of adult-onset diabetes by 650%. (I'll stop here for now) It's not an issue of metabolic rate. If you sleep all day to lower your metabolic rate will you live longer? Of course not. The issue is *fat* and how *clean* is the body burning it's fuel. Our bodies are fueled by the burning of food in the furnaces of the cells, your brain, muscle & organs. This internal fire is like wood or oil but burns more slowly & cleanly (produces less ash & debris) Burning foods in the mitochondria of muscle cells or logs in a fireplace all work by combing a spark with oxygen to release energy stored as fuel. This process is known as oxidation. It's important to realize all the food you eat is mainly light & air. Your body is almost all light & air. For health & longevity you don't stop oxidation you maximize it. Oxidation is the basic process of biological life. Uncontrolled oxidation is the villain. In controlled oxidation pairs of hydrogen atoms fire off from the fuel to hit oxygen released by hemoglobin in your blood to cause explosive reactions of stored sunlight & form harmless waste products of water & carbon dioxide. 95% of this process is clean & produces hardly any free radicals. But 5% of the energy release is uncontrolled oxidation in the form of free radicals. They are like sparks that put burns in your carpet. Unless you shield them they put wholes in your body & manifest as disease. This is where antioxidants come in. If anyone is interested I can post a reasonable antioxidant program detailing what & how much to take. There's many different kinds of free radicals & antioxidants so in order to be effective one needs to take many different kinds in the correct proportion. > It is also well known that people who fast periodically > tend to live longer. It's a bit more complex than that. See, I could fast quite a bit, smoke, eat bacon all day, never exercise and I probably wouldn't do so hot. Conversely I could never fast, exercise properly, eat all the right clean foods & supplements, not smoke etc. and do much better. I think you can begin to see the complexity. I would only recommend fasting to someone who is in toxic overload or approaching toxic overload. Because fasting in and of itself is very unhealthy I can offer an alternative to fasting that is much healthier. Implement a broad spectrum anti oxidant program, take it every day, eat only pure clean foods (some processed in moderation) and drink distilled water. My sister who I mentioned earlier does not periodically fast. She doesn't need too. She's eliminated toxins from the diet to begin with and what little toxins she does get is very easily handled by the body and she is not exposed to the detrimental effects of fasting. Review of latest aging data by gerontology experts Ken Manton & Eric Stallard of Duke Univ suggests the current scientific knowledge is sufficiently advanced to support maximum lifespans in the US & Canada of 130 for men & 136 for women. To put the record straight the oldest human with valid documentation is a Frenchwoman named Jean Calment who died in 1998 at 122. David (at your service) Feel free to forward as inclined Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 18, 1999 Report Share Posted May 18, 1999 Thanks David for a lot of fascinating and excellent information. I appreciate your taking the time to do so and its nice to be up on the latest scientific research on nutrition. I will forward your post as it might be helpful for some people. Thanks again David and you have our gratitude. Harsha David Bozzi wrote: > > Harsha: Thanks Jan and David for the great lessons on nutrition. > > You are quite welcome. > > > Perhaps you can explain more > > of the ionized protein powders. I had not heard of them. > > Here's what you want. Ionic-exchanged whey protein isolate. The benefits are > not only enormous but exclusive only to this form. Don't go for whey protein > concentrate. Not bad stuff. In fact it's what ionic-exchanged whey is made from. > Whey concentrate is selected because it contains all the aminos in the correct proportion > *&* then it's run through an enzymatic bath which produces all those > di & tripeptides (there's some in foods too but not to the same extent.) > which are chemical keys that trigger physiological responses in the body that are > enormously healthy. > > 1. Immunity is enhanced by up to 500%. Whey is now used in treatment of cancer & other > immune debilitating diseases in fact. > 2. Insulin metabolism is optimized. > 3.The BV (biological value) is the highest known. BV is the amount of protein retained > in the body per gram absorbed. It scores a 159. Whey concentrate 104. Whole egg 100. > Milk 91. Fish 83. Beef 80. Chicken 79. Soy 74. Rice 59. Wheat 54. Beans 49. > Forget about fruit as a protein source. > 4. Fat free. > 5. Contains a lot of alanine & the branched chain aminos. > 6. Cause sustained increases in glutathione, one of your most important anti oxidants > and confers resistance to a variety of diseases & carcinogens. > 7. Optimizes hormonal health. > (I'll stop for now, tho I've just started) If anyone wants a link to the cheapest place > to get it let me know.) > > > I have heard of scientific experiments with mice where the mice fed a starvation diet > > lived > > a much longer life. > > What does this mean? Well, it means the mice were being overfed to their > detriment previously with regard to the amount of energy they could expend. > To say eat less and leave it there is really doesn't mean much. > Less than what? We know with humans as one's *bodyfat percentage* rises so > do the disease rates. Bodyfat is by far our worst health risk. It cause more illness than > all the environmental & nutrition problems, than smoking, alcohol & all other drugs put > together. Infinitely worse than over-publicized AIDS. > > Some quick facts: > 1. Over weight (eating excesses) accounts for 25% of the deaths caused by cancer in the > US. > 2. A 10% increase above ideal body fat percentage cause a 6% increase in blood pressure. > 3. With 50 extra lbs risk of hypertension increases to 700%. > 4. What medical & insurance companies consider 'normal' for bodyfat increases > cardiovascular risk in women 400%. > 5. Very moderate overweight increases chance of adult-onset diabetes by 650%. > (I'll stop here for now) > > It's not an issue of metabolic rate. If you sleep all day to lower your metabolic > rate will you live longer? Of course not. The issue is *fat* and how *clean* is > the body burning it's fuel. Our bodies are fueled by the burning of food in the furnaces > of the cells, your brain, muscle & organs. This internal fire is like wood or oil but > burns more slowly & cleanly (produces less ash & debris) Burning foods in the mitochondria > of muscle cells or logs in a fireplace all work by combing a spark with oxygen to release > energy stored as fuel. This process is known as oxidation. It's important to realize all > the food you eat is mainly light & air. Your body is almost all light & air. For health & > longevity you don't stop oxidation you maximize it. Oxidation is the basic process of > biological life. Uncontrolled oxidation is the villain. In controlled oxidation pairs of > hydrogen atoms fire off from the fuel > to hit oxygen released by hemoglobin in your blood to cause explosive reactions of stored > sunlight & form harmless waste products of water & carbon dioxide. 95% of this process is > clean & produces hardly any free radicals. But 5% of the energy release is uncontrolled > oxidation in the form of free radicals. They are like sparks that put burns in your > carpet. Unless you shield them they put wholes in your body & manifest as disease. This is > where antioxidants come in. > > If anyone is interested I can post a reasonable antioxidant program detailing what & how > much to take. There's many different kinds of free radicals & antioxidants so in order to > be effective one needs to take many different kinds in the correct proportion. > > > It is also well known that people who fast periodically > > tend to live longer. > > It's a bit more complex than that. See, I could fast quite a bit, smoke, > eat bacon all day, never exercise and I probably wouldn't do so hot. > Conversely I could never fast, exercise properly, eat all the right clean foods & > supplements, not smoke etc. and do much better. I think you can begin to see the > complexity. > > I would only recommend fasting to someone who is in toxic overload or approaching > toxic overload. Because fasting in and of itself is very unhealthy I can offer an > alternative to fasting that is much healthier. Implement a broad spectrum anti oxidant > program, take it every day, eat only pure clean foods (some processed in moderation) > and drink distilled water. My sister who I mentioned earlier does not periodically fast. > She doesn't need too. She's eliminated toxins from the diet to begin with and what little > toxins she does get is very easily handled by the body and she is not exposed to the > detrimental effects of fasting. > > Review of latest aging data by gerontology experts Ken Manton & Eric Stallard of Duke Univ > suggests the current scientific knowledge is sufficiently advanced to support maximum > lifespans in the US & Canada of 130 for men & 136 for women. > > To put the record straight the oldest human with valid documentation is a Frenchwoman > named Jean Calment who died in 1998 at 122. > > David > (at your service) > > Feel free to forward as inclined > > ------ > It's finally here! What's your opinion? > > Create a Star Wars discussion group at ONElist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 1999 Report Share Posted May 19, 1999 No matter what, The occasional Bannana Split with Chocolate, strawberry, pineapple, whipped cream for dinner is not all bad maitri, --janpa tsomo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 1999 Report Share Posted May 19, 1999 "Debora A. Orf" wrote: > No matter what, > > The occasional Bannana Split with Chocolate, strawberry, pineapple, > whipped cream for dinner is not all bad Not bad? That's heavenly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 1999 Report Share Posted May 19, 1999 At 10:44 PM 5/18/99 -0400, you wrote: >"Harsha (Dr. Harsh K. Luthar)" <hluthar > >its nice to be up on the latest scientific research on nutrition. Why? What does this fragile, dying thing called a "body" have to do with spirituality at all? How can prolonging the life of this chunk of bone and flesh have the slightest thing to do with the birthless, deathless Atman (Self)? Genuinely curious, Tim ----- Visit The Core of the WWW at: http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/ND/index.html Music, Poetry, Writings on Nondual Spiritual Topics. Tim's Windows and DOS Shareware/Freeware is at: http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/shareware.html ______ NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet. Shouldn't you? Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 1999 Report Share Posted May 19, 1999 So much identification with the body, and with the pleasures of the senses. At 11:24 PM 5/18/99 -0400, you wrote: >David Bozzi <david.bozzi > >"Debora A. Orf" wrote: > >> No matter what, >> >> The occasional Bannana Split with Chocolate, strawberry, pineapple, >> whipped cream for dinner is not all bad > >Not bad? >That's heavenly. ----- Visit The Core of the WWW at: http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/ND/index.html Music, Poetry, Writings on Nondual Spiritual Topics. Tim's Windows and DOS Shareware/Freeware is at: http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/shareware.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 1999 Report Share Posted May 19, 1999 Hello there Sam, Ah Sam wrote: > I met a young lady last year in China and was with her for a few days. She > and her acquaintances claimed that she had been in total fast for 5 years > and was still fasting, as an involuntary and unintentional result from Qi > Gong practice. She only drank a bit of water. A few more people also told > me that they had total fast too, but lasting only from a few days to a few > weeks. Again, as result from Qi Gong practice > > I am still skeptical, but there were no motives for them to fabricate it if > there is no truth to it. > > Welcome any wisdom from you all. If someone lies there's always a reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 1999 Report Share Posted May 19, 1999 > Tim Gerchmez <fewtch > > At 10:44 PM 5/18/99 -0400, you wrote: > >"Harsha (Dr. Harsh K. Luthar)" <hluthar > > > >its nice to be up on the latest scientific research on nutrition. > > Why? > > What does this fragile, dying thing called a "body" have to do with > spirituality at all? How can prolonging the life of this chunk > of bone and > flesh have the slightest thing to do with the birthless, deathless Atman > (Self)? > > Genuinely curious, > > Tim Anyone who isn't satisfied with occasional spiritual experiences, but wants to transcend all veils that separate one from Atman, so that Atman becomes "24 hour a day reality, independent of activity or thoughts", needs a very strong, resilient body to bear the power of Kundalini. So longevity isn't a goal at all; it is just a by-product. Apart from that, one has to be free from fear, caused by the loss of body or parts of it. Jan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 1999 Report Share Posted May 19, 1999 >Sam: I met a young lady last year in China and was with her for a few > days. She > and her acquaintances claimed that she had been in total fast for 5 years > and was still fasting, as an involuntary and unintentional result from Qi > Gong practice. She only drank a bit of water. A few more people > also told > me that they had total fast too, but lasting only from a few days > to a few > weeks. Again, as result from Qi Gong practice > > I am still skeptical, but there were no motives for them to > fabricate it if > there is no truth to it. > > Welcome any wisdom from you all. > > Best health, > > Sam. Instead of believing, I would have taken a simple test, having the lady exercise with an intensity that will cause her to perspire. Anyone living like a breatharian will produce perspiration fluid that is almost pure water and of course that perspiration can't be smelly. The mere refusal to undergo the test would have been interpreted as an answer. Jan (truth is always simple) Harsha: It would appear that elementary sniffing on your part Sam would have gotten to the bottom of this whole matter. Which makes me wonder, if one is going to sniff out the truth in this context, where should one start. From the top or from the bottom (or would just sniffing in the general vicinity be more appropriate and perhaps within the parameters of common courtesy). :--). You guys (gals) are great! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 1999 Report Share Posted May 19, 1999 There are stories of a lady (in India, who has received enlightment and never eats. QiQong is a balancing energy technique much as Reiki is. Reiki has been called a Lazy man's qiqong. Another name for QiQong is chi Gong or (japanese) TAI Gong. Ah Sam wrote: > > "Ah Sam" <ah__sam > > Hi, > > I would like to share an experience I had and ask for enlightenment from > list members. > > I met a young lady last year in China and was with her for a few days. She > and her acquaintances claimed that she had been in total fast for 5 years > and was still fasting, as an involuntary and unintentional result from Qi > Gong practice. She only drank a bit of water. A few more people also told > me that they had total fast too, but lasting only from a few days to a few > weeks. Again, as result from Qi Gong practice > > I am still skeptical, but there were no motives for them to fabricate it if > there is no truth to it. > > Welcome any wisdom from you all. > > Best health, > > Sam. > > _____________ > Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com > > ------ > With more than 17 million e-mails exchanged daily... > > ...ONElist is THE place where the world talks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 19, 1999 Report Share Posted May 19, 1999 Carolyn Maloney wrote: > There are stories of a lady (in India, > who has received enlightment and never > eats. > QiQong is a balancing energy technique > much as Reiki is. Reiki has been called > a Lazy man's qiqong. Another name for > QiQong is chi Gong or (japanese) TAI > Gong. In an article in the "Noetic Sciences" it states Qi Gong masters' claim that they can modulate AC current, from any common source such as a wall socket. The author says he witnessed a master grab two live wires, and light a light bulb by touching it with other fingers from both hands, regulate the voltage with will, and not suffer from electrocution. (I should hope not, otherwise stick with the lamp method.) The author's colleague's muscles went into spasm when touched by the master. Whether he went into spasm or not was controlled by the master. The author allowed the master to touch him for a second and said he did indeed feel "live." For the final demonstration the master grabbed the wires along with two skewers in each hand, stuck them into a pork chop which began to smoke and flame. (Now I'm hungary) No damage to the master's skin or severe heart irregularity or seizure. The author was David Eisenberg, MD who is interested in conducting controlled studies for this phenomena. The healing potentials are the underlying reason for practicing Qi Gong, (not cooking pork chops). David Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.