JB/Mice and Men/Scientifically sound and Spiritual Diets

[Guest guest]

At 10:31 PM 5/19/99 +0100, you wrote:

>"jb" <kvy9

>Then be my guest to "arrive" at Moksha without Kundalini, which probably

>will happen after 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 kalpas or so.

 

Religious dogmatic opinion noted.

>BTW, anyone who isn't attached to the body doesn't have a problem with

>urdhva retas or a simple sattvic diet either. And how about attachment to

>other bodies like those of pets? That isn't attachment? Not being attached

>to one's body but to that of a pet - thanks for the "laugh of the day".

 

I am attracted to the spirit in the pet, the indwelling Atman, not the

pet's body. The freedom, warmth and loving spirit inherent in certain

animals far exceeds that of most humans, especially those so covered with

ego that they brag constantly about their "twice-born," enlightened status.

The body means little to me, other than it being a beautiful thing to look

at, like a sunset.

>Jan

>(not attached to non-attachment)

 

Talk is cheap.

 

Hari OM,

 

Tim

 

-----

Visit The Core of the WWW at:

http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/ND/index.html

Music, Poetry, Writings on Nondual Spiritual Topics.

 

Tim's Windows and DOS Shareware/Freeware is at:

http://www.eskimo.com/~fewtch/shareware.html

______

NetZero - We believe in a FREE Internet. Shouldn't you?

Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at

http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html

[Guest guest]

> Tim Gerchmez <fewtch

[...]

> >BTW, anyone who isn't attached to the body doesn't have a problem with

> >urdhva retas or a simple sattvic diet either. And how about attachment to

> >other bodies like those of pets? That isn't attachment? Not

> being attached

> >to one's body but to that of a pet - thanks for the "laugh of the day".

>

> I am attracted to the spirit in the pet, the indwelling Atman, not the

> pet's body.

 

Then why need a pet at all? Needing the body of a pet to see indwelling

Atman - if that is true, why not have many pets with all their attractive

indwelling Atmans? According to simple logic, Atman relates to Brahman as a

drop of water relates to the ocean. So how about the indwelling Atman of

persons like Hitler?

 

The freedom, warmth and loving spirit inherent in certain

> animals far exceeds that of most humans, especially those so covered with

> ego that they brag constantly about their "twice-born,"

> enlightened status.

 

Failing to see the indwelling Atman in persons like Hitler?

Reminds of a joke - Q: "how does a hypocrite find truth?"

A: "By reading 'truth' ".

> The body means little to me, other than it being a beautiful

> thing to look

> at, like a sunset.

 

The why not buy a hologram; it will never shit on the carpet and its Atman

will teach without the need for food

> >Jan

> >(not attached to non-attachment)

>

> Talk is cheap.

>

> Hari OM,

 

but according to you that is cheap,

> Tim

 

Thanks for providing a key to decode your posts that aren't literal quotes

 

Jan