Meat/Iswara etc.

[Guest guest]

Namaste Brothers and Sisters, Susanne.

 

As there are different levels of human, animal to Divine. So this

affects who eats meat etc. I may sound militant but I am quite

tolerant. I only talk about not eating meat etc to people who purport

to be on the spiritual path, each to his own.

 

Re: God being a person of Light, full of sparks of light. You say that

you observed this in meditation/vision. A couple of questions, but

first, this vision was of Iswara or the Personal Illusory God. Not

Nirguna or Impersonal, transcendant God.

Ask yourself the question, "Who", was observing this vision?? Secondly

what shape does 'God' take for a non-human? or the consciousness of

energy? This vision was a gift, but for Moksha you will have to cut

through it as surely as Ramakrishn had to cut through his vision of

Kali.

 

Love Tony.

===

Keep on truckin-Chant the Gayatri!

 

"God is formless. In order to merge in the formless God,

you have to give up identification with the body."

"There is only one Soul and that is God." Sai Baba.

_______

 

Get your free @ address at

[Guest guest]

Tony O'Clery wrote:

> Re: God being a person of Light, full of sparks of light. You say that

> you observed this in meditation/vision. A couple of questions, but

> first, this vision was of Iswara or the Personal Illusory God. Not

> Nirguna or Impersonal, transcendant God.

>From my perception it was God showing itself to me in a way I could identify

at that time.I was ambivalent about God. This vision shocked me because it

presented God in a way

that I found very odd and unexpected.

> Ask yourself the question, "Who", was observing this vision??

 

This is a good question. At the time of the vision, Kundalini was in the

middle of awakening, uncoiling at the muladhara. I was moving and sliding

like a snake and in a trance. The ego selfhad retreated momentarily. "I"

was Shakti and I was seeing where I was going.

> Secondly

> what shape does 'God' take for a non-human? or the consciousness of

> energy?

 

I identify it like the scientists who were all given a view of the elephant,

piece by piece. Nobody was given the whole picture, and each had to

determine what it was from just a part. I saw the bit I was shown and

interpreted it accordingly. Non humans probably also get their bit of the

picture too.

 

> This vision was a gift, but for Moksha you will have to cut

> through it as surely as Ramakrishn had to cut through his vision of

> Kali.

>

 

I see moksha as the time I will experience the whole picture, not the part.

 

Regards,

Sue

http://www.adelaide.net.au/~smacrae