Guest guest Posted June 10, 1999 Report Share Posted June 10, 1999 Thank you for your wise and insightful words Frankji and Sadaji and Ramji...Moorthyji, Madhavji, well I could go on and on and on. Perhaps we should express gratitude more often for company like this which pervades our mental atmosphere. Bowing to all who read this on all lists. Namaste................................Harsha Sri Frank Ji of the advaitin list: hariH OM! friends, from the advaitin point of view, witnessing philosophic debates has value insofar as its affording the opportunity to learn, not from the ideas, per se, but rather their implication in the wider context of what drives the mind in its need to relatively know. of course this brand of knowing is the polar opposite of the knowing implied in jnana, which is the noumenal [viz. beyond the phenomenal]. in approaching any of these classic debates: first we have the matter of semantics with words, then semantics with ideas, and finally we involve ourselves with the wild goose chase of philosophical speculation, with the ulterior mission of securing a hands-on knowledge of 'what's what.' and this pursuit for a 'hands-on knowledge of what's what' is precisely where we're making our biggest mistake. because the answer we seek is not amenable to reason or relativity. we should never lose sight of the fact that the goal, not only of advaita but dvaita and visisthadvaita, is to stop the mind from plaguing [and thereby reinforcing] the illusion of the separative-bound jiva. of course this sounds impossible, simply because it *is* impossible! nevertheless our charge is to extricate such hypnotic delusion--which is afterall accomplished by the simplest means, sooner or later, in the course of our 'pathless path.' although the three methods differ in their approach to accomplish this destruction of the [philosophical] Mind, their goal is the same. and it merely depends on the temperament of the individual, as to which method is chosen. the tyagi who can truly renounce the fruit of his/her actions, the bhakta who can truly sacrifice his jiva to isvara, or the jnanayogin who can truly realize that brahman is the lone reality, *all* become jivanmuktas in the end, all become One in parabrahmam. in fact, we are *already* That. OM ramanarpanamastu! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.