Guest guest Posted July 8, 1999 Report Share Posted July 8, 1999 Namaste, I think a better word than ego would be 'I ness', otherwise I will be caught up in dialectual intellectual rubbish. Re: Jesus I'm sure that Jesus only had the Divine, non-attached 'I ness', of the Bhodisattvas, the 'I ness', that observes only. He, according to my information gave up this residual shadow, when He achieved Moksha on the cross? As for Manson, a demonic nature or an actor in the play of illusion? Or just a lunatic among lunatics? Perhaps without a Manson we would not recognise a Jesus? Who is Shakespeare anyway? Tony. === Keep on truckin-Chant the Gayatri! "God is formless. In order to merge in the formless God, you have to give up identification with the body." "There is only one Soul and that is God." Sai Baba. _______ Get your free @ address at Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 1999 Report Share Posted July 8, 1999 Tony O'Clery wrote: > As for Manson, a demonic nature or an actor in the play of illusion? Manson often knew himself to be the Christ. No different than any of us or any 'mystic' who has experienced mystical states. > Perhaps without a Manson we would not recognise a Jesus? What we need to realize is that we are capable of manifesting either one and that we have the power to choose, and that this power to choose is continually exercised each and every moment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.