Guest guest Posted September 27, 1999 Report Share Posted September 27, 1999 ivan: I don't. Dan did. I am exactly saying that there is nothing to ask about it... Dan: Is it my imagination, or is this conversation getting silly? Oh, that's right, imagination is unreal and only materiality is real. So these typed letters simply are what they are - letters on a page. Interpretation is meaningless. ------------------------------- ivan: Where is the mind apart from a mind object....a thought....a concept. Manifestation is nowhere...as this. Dan: Somehow the idea that "manifestation is nowhere" doesn't strike me as consistent with your idea that materiality is all that is. But then, consistency isn't all it's cracked up to be anyway. :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 27, 1999 Report Share Posted September 27, 1999 On Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:21:37 -0400 "Dan Berkow, PhD" <berkowd writes: > "Dan Berkow, PhD" <berkowd > > ivan: I don't. Dan did. I am exactly saying that there is nothing > to ask about it... > > Dan: Is it my imagination, or is this conversation getting silly? > Oh, that's right, imagination is unreal and only materiality > is real. So these typed letters simply are what they are - > letters on a page. Interpretation is meaningless. > ------------------------------- > ivan: Where is the mind apart from > a mind object....a thought....a concept. Manifestation is > nowhere...as this. > > Dan: Somehow the idea that "manifestation is nowhere" doesn't > strike > me as consistent with your idea that materiality is all that > is. > But then, consistency isn't all it's cracked up to be > anyway. :-) > The word "mind" is thought's attempt to depict itself (*to* itself!) as an ongoing, persistent entity rather than the series of transient events it is. http://come.to/realization http://www.users.uniserve.com/~samuel/brucemrg.htm http://www.users.uniserve.com/~samuel/brucsong.htm _ _________________ Get the Internet just the way you want it. Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month! Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 27, 1999 Report Share Posted September 27, 1999 ivan: I don't. Dan did. I am exactly saying that there is nothing to ask about it... Dan: Is it my imagination, or is this conversation getting silly? ivan: To whom? Dan: Oh, that's right, imagination is unreal and only materiality is real. ivan: No! Imagination is real as that. Materiality is real as that. And your eventual lack of interest in seeing this is real as that! Still friends?? Dan:So these typed letters simply are what they are - letters on a page. Interpretation is meaningless. ivan:No!!!! There are letters on the screen as visual image. There are words on the screen with meaning. The meaning of words are gathered through an hability called "listening". If listening is disturbed by interpretation according to pre-conceived ideias and subtle images concerning qualities of the inner self, then listening stops, and the self will say that it is meaningless, worthless, silly, may even fall deeply asleep.....anything to avoid breaking the confortable self-picture. ------------------------------- ivan: Where is the mind apart from a mind object....a thought....a concept. Manifestation is nowhere...as this. Dan: Somehow the idea that "manifestation is nowhere" doesn't strike me as consistent with your idea that materiality is all that is. ivan: Manifestation is nowhere known. And materiality is a quality inherent to materials. Fluidity is typical of liquids and gas. And thought has a very peculiar and particular quality that needs to be recognised in order not to get cought by it. Dan:But then, consistency isn't all it's cracked up to be anyway. :-) ivan: Doesn't seems so....Something keeps on trukin awlright inside there,... very consistently.... LOL LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 27, 1999 Report Share Posted September 27, 1999 On Mon, 27 Sep 1999 14:21:37 -0400 "Dan Berkow, PhD" <berkowd writes: > "Dan Berkow, PhD" <berkowd > > ivan: I don't. Dan did. I am exactly saying that there is nothing > to ask about it... > > Dan: Is it my imagination, or is this conversation getting silly? > Oh, that's right, imagination is unreal and only materiality > is real. So these typed letters simply are what they are - > letters on a page. Interpretation is meaningless. > ------------------------------- > ivan: Where is the mind apart from > a mind object....a thought....a concept. Manifestation is > nowhere...as this. > > Dan: Somehow the idea that "manifestation is nowhere" doesn't > strike > me as consistent with your idea that materiality is all that > is. > But then, consistency isn't all it's cracked up to be > anyway. :-) > Bruce:The word "mind" is thought's attempt to depict itself (*to* itself!) as an ongoing, persistent entity rather than the series of transient events it is. ivan: Of course!! Beautifull!! Isn´t it?!! Thought found a clever subtle and "very inteligent" way of conceiving an ongoing parameter calle "mind". And now the self can go on without being disturbed in its duality...cos mind is taken as diferent from self..... LOL LOL LOL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.