Guest guest Posted September 28, 1999 Report Share Posted September 28, 1999 ==Gene Poole== wrote: << It is that some, in using words of the actual, lock others into the illusory. >> The polarization effect, i call it in my jargon... There must be a _some_ that as the ability to unlock the property of "locking" being created by some using words of the actual. Is this _some_ or force called Shaktipat? Don't know. << It has been as though, I simply had to learn to _abide_ the passage of time, to eventually 'catch up' to myself, to recognize myself as the author of those words. >> Is it the start of the intake of a breath, after the outake of the breath found out that it starts to lose consistency as it moves away from it source, that "catch up" in the full initial intake? <<Pointing out that "it need not be sought, because it is what you are" if understood, serves to counteract the looking-without which world-dream propoganda engenders. Ultimately, though, one finds that 'within' and 'without' are simply phases of the same 'thing'. Ultimately, it is the looker who is seen looking at the looker... as you know, Mirror. ==Gene Poole== >> Antoine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.