Guest guest Posted October 3, 1999 Report Share Posted October 3, 1999 In a message dated 10/3/99 11:30:14 AM Central Daylight Time, berkowd writes: << Therefore, my unnecessary message turns out to have been necessary, at least for your response. Is there not a karmic principle involved here? >> No. Just a graphic example of Interdependent Cause - Emptiness. The exchange is Empty. And Empty of all redeeming value <g> diana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 1999 Report Share Posted October 3, 1999 In a message dated 10/3/99 10:40:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time, glee writes: << If I am reading messages about non-existent messages about events which never happened, am I real? Just wondering, >> No, you are not real...but neither were the messages, the content, or the senders real, either, so no worries. Also, this message, although sent, and being read, is also not real and only virtual, since it is merely electronic. Content has been stripped from all electronic communications to conserve bandwidth as Y2K approaches. Disregard all communications that are sent in electronic form, from this moment on. That includes this message, of course. Rest assured that I also, have no actual existence and merely have a virtual state of existence in your mind, not in reality. Blessings Zenbob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 1999 Report Share Posted October 3, 1999 > ><< dan: I am sure you will be understanding about > this situation, as it has never arisen. >> > >In which case - your message - was entirely unnecessary. Void where >prohibited - no eternal warranty applies. > >diana Your necessary message could only be written as a statement about my message. Therefore, my unnecessary message turns out to have been necessary, at least for your response. Is there not a karmic principle involved here? Reactions to an event that never arose themselves never arose, although they may have seemed necessary at the time. Love, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 1999 Report Share Posted October 3, 1999 >"Dan Berkow, PhD" <berkowd > > >> >><< dan: I am sure you will be understanding about >> this situation, as it has never arisen. >> >> >>In which case - your message - was entirely unnecessary. Void where >>prohibited - no eternal warranty applies. >> >>diana > >Your necessary message could only be written as a statement about >my message. Therefore, my unnecessary message turns out to have >been necessary, at least for your response. >Is there not a karmic principle involved here? >Reactions to an event that never arose themselves never arose, >although they may have seemed necessary at the time. > >Love, Dan > If I am reading messages about non-existent messages about events which never happened, am I real? Just wondering, Glo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.