Guest guest Posted October 25, 1999 Report Share Posted October 25, 1999 Harsha - thank you for your statement of insight. I particularly enjoyed the passage below: >All objectivisation is conceptual, all conceptuality is inference, and all >inference is as empty of truth as a vacuum is empty of air. Yes, including this statement. So we reach a point where nothing can be indicated, and even the idea of indicating anything can't arise. >Moreover there >is no truth, never has been and never could be; there is no thus-ness, >such-ness, is-ness, nor anything positive or negative whatever. Yes, including this statement, which statement cannot therefore be regarded as a true statement, as saying anything worthwhile or not worthwhile, or even as existing or not existing. >There is >just absolute absence of the cognisable, which is absolute presence of the >unthinkable and the unknowable — which neither is nor is not. Inferentially >this is said to be an immense and radiant splendour untrammelled by notions >of time and space, and utterly beyond the dim, reflected sentience of >temporal and finite imagination. Yes, and this temporal imagination cannot be said to exist or not exist, and as you mentioned earlier the idea of liberation from "it" is itself a fantasy. Many appreciations and much love, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.