Guest guest Posted October 30, 1999 Report Share Posted October 30, 1999 >Rainbo: >Can it not be named, this unity of consciousness, >unconsciousness, awareness? D: Who will dare name it? >In seriousness, I think the stripping away of thought >and allowing the intuitional flow of bliss, or God, >permeating, happens after the consciousness and sub- >consciousness inform each other, but to bring all >of the unconscious to consciousness, perhaps this is >impossible ... D: Yes, it's too much for consciousness to bear. Better to let the dividing line become more and more permeable until, voila, there is simply awareness/being/love as such, as light, as nothingness. >perhaps not, but like bliss, perhaps >only one perspective of the hologram can be viewed >at a moment ... and then one moves to a new view, >and sometimes a new hologram, ... D: The hologram with no point of view, no point to view it from - now That's a hologram! Who can say anything true about it? >These words make me feel like the light has >jumped into the Grand Canyon, which also cannot be >seen all at once until one enters a airplane, but then >one loses the beauty of the closeness, so perhaps it >is an energetic dance of the divine with different >entry points of merging... D: When entry and leaving don't apply, when far and near are the same, when merging and separation are empty - I would whisper its name ... but that would be too loud ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.