Guest guest Posted November 4, 1999 Report Share Posted November 4, 1999 At 04:43 PM 11/4/99 -0500, Dan Berkow, PhD wrote: >>Skye: >>If there is a sterile singularity i am simultaneously there already, between the 0-1 of the atom, between each now moment i exist, but it is not my study. I am here to learn the fullness of love and play. To *identify* with creativity, sorry guys another no no word. Does that mean i'm not towing the nondual line? :-))) Dan: This nonduality that has right words and wrong words, correct ways to view things and incorrect ways to view things -- what a feeble thing it must be. I'd rather have the nonduality that exploded the entire universe at once. In fact, I'd rather not have nonduality at all! -- with love -- Hey Skye and Dan, You non-duality outlaws, reprobates. Yes, Skye, you have violated one of the non-duality linguistic laws by using "identify." I'm in the enemy camp too. Here's a story that happened to me (from my page on Jerry's site): One of the disciples of Papaji of Lucknow, India, now himself a teacher, told me this: to avoid the appearance of identification with the ego, some of Papaji's disciples go into linguistic contortions to avoid using the first person pronoun. It has become known as the "Lucknow Disease." You can't even discuss a movie without the disease striking. This happened recently: Some of us in our weekly satsang were discussing movies. Someone said, "THE 13TH FLOOR was great." I said "I really loved THREE SEASONS." A friend said, "WHO loved it?" His girlfriend (not a Papaji follower) kicked him, saying "Honey!!" Then I asked him, "Who wants to know?" Love, --Greg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.