Interesting...

[Guest guest]

The Theory of DNA as it applies to the mental function

 

This theory postulates that DNA is mentally accessible and programmable by

the individual, that the brain

is only the most noticeable seat of mental activity, that every cell in the

human body is connected and is

accessible on the mental level.

Programming cells is defined as the act of encoding a function or action of

individual cells so that the

action can be accurately repeated and operates similarly to the act of

programming a computer.

Thinking is defined as programming at the highest level in a hierarchically

arranged mental process.

Practice is defined as programming at a lower level, normally in the interests

of controlling appendages. For

example, practicing the playing of a musical instrument is intended to program

the cells of the hands and arms

so that those actions can be accomplished without the aid of the brain. The

brain is thereby freed for other

purposes while the act of playing the instrument goes on. Consciousness can, for

instance, anticipate the

execution of cellular level programs and modify their action while in progress.

This allows a musician to play a

song in one style or another according to the demands of the occasion.

The entirety of the mental contents of living things resides in the DNA of

individual cells, and is extensible

by individuals during their lives. That which is learned during life is passed

on to one's children at the moment of

conception. In general, we can say that everything of importance to survival is

known by the age of twenty or so

and is passed on and subsequent learning is more tentative and attuned to the

historical moment and isn't

passed on. There is also a class issue here. At the lower levels of the culture

early procreation is normal,

reflecting the perception that subsequent learning is not likely to be useful

and may be deleterious. At the upper

levels of the culture later and later procreation occurs reflecting the

realization that more and more acquired

knowledge will be useful to the next generation. This makes clear the tendency

for families to become more and

more effective in life as the generations go on and what is lost when rebellion

leads to marrying down. On the

other hand, when the individual becomes convinced that the family is on a futile

journey that is going to

negatively affect survival potential, rebellion and marrying downward may be the

best solution.

The hierarchy of mental function is consciousness first, followed by

cellular. At the cellular level, one's own

programming being nearest in time is most powerful, followed by the parents

contribution, the grandparents

contribution, and so on back to the beginnings. Because of this, old programming

can be overridden by new.

DNA is capable of encoding the input of the senses: images, sounds, odors,

sensations, and even

emotions. This is because these inputs are processed by the brain to make them

sensible which reduces them

to digital representations which can be stored in DNA. For example, images have

to be turned right side up by

the brain.

Any individual cell that participates in any action retains a memory of

that action and if the action is

repeated many times the memory becomes a permanent acquisition of the cell and

is inheritable.

Once a cell is programmed for an action, that action can be invoked by the

executive (consciousness) in

the same way that a subprogram in a computer can be invoked by the main program.

Once invoked, no further

participation by consciousness is required, unless the program is not perfectly

adapted to the circumstances.

For example: driving a car is largely programmed at the cellular level after a

few years of practice and therefor

can be performed at the cellular level while consciousness concerns itself with

other things. This is dangerous in

the beginning because not enough circumstances are captured at the cellular

level, but, as time goes on, all but

the most unusual circumstances become cellular. And, it is possible with

sufficient practice to program

instructions for interrupting consciousness and bringing attention back to

driving when situations unfamiliar at

the cellular level arise.

Cellular level functioning is referred to as subconscious or unconscious

behavior by the Freudian and

Jungian schools of psychological behavior.

Rules of moral and ethical behavior, unexplored by the individual conscious

complex are available at the

cellular level and are referred to as the conscience. The parents contribution

is most powerful, then the

grandparents and so on.

When common activities not experienced for several generations are

reexperienced, since memories of

them still exist in DNA, that fact can manifest itself in terms of unexpectedly

adapted actions by the individual.

This will also account for deja vu and the feeling that one has lived in the

long ago. All memories are related by

association, which means that any similarities between experiences results in a

connection that is mentally

accessible.

At the top of the hierarchy, learning is most easily disposed of or lost.

Strictly mental functionality is not

even transferred in procreation, though receptivity might be. That receptivity

may be correlated with age, that is

to say that receptivity to language, for instance may exist only during the ages

normally associated with

language acquisition.

So, there is a transience parameter associated with learning. Repetition is

key. If an experience is unique

and meaningless it is quickly lost from memory. If an experience is repeated

many times or is particularly

meaningful in terms of survival or understanding it is retained over a much

longer period.

The goal of this functionality is survival, so it is important to retain

important information and just as

important to forget useless information.

Understanding is important for survival because it allows accurate

prediction of the future.

From a survival perspective, cellular memory is most important, conscious

memory is next and books or

other recorded media is least important.

Consciousness is very bright and washes out direct experience of cellular

memory. But, consciousness is

mainly concerned with images and symbols, and much less so with feelings, so

cellular feelings are readily

experienced by awareness and become the prime carrier of information between the

cellular level and

consciousness.

Consciousness can override cellular awareness, so that when one makes

oneself aware of all of the

parameters of a particular experience he can consciously direct his actions. If

consciousness regarding an

experience does not exist, one must act in accordance with one's feelings as the

only source of intelligence.

Supervisors can, of course, override individual feelings in an organization.

So, the existence of free will largely depends on consciousness. To the

extent we are conscious of the

parameters of any experience we can choose our actions, otherwise we will

experience a lack of choice.

If one is asleep, one will react in accord with cellular awareness,

consciousness not being available. This

can result in contradictory actions if the culture is in the act of redefining

moral and ethical rules of behavior, as

at present.

Thinking is a conscious behavior. It is the process of programming high

level (brain level) memory.

Cellular memory has an analogous function, which we call dreaming. When driving

while thinking of work, the

dreamer or unconscious thinker is operating the vehicle. When consciousness is

inactive, if awake, we become

aware of unconscious fantasies or, if asleep, dreams.

In computer terms, we are blessed with two processors, the conscious one

and the unconscious one.

They are capable of performing two distinct operations simultaneously. Non

humans must be expected to have

only one processor. Humans normally have two, but if significant complexes other

than the conscious complex

exist, may have more. Examples of humans in this unhappy state would be The

Unibomber: Theodore Kozinski,

Jeffrey Daumer, and similar anti social outcasts. The reason for their anti

social behavior is the minimal

contents of the controlling complex. Since their experiential complex is split,

neither has the advantage of the

complete experience of the individual. One may be very childish indeed but have

access to the complete mental

power of the adult (See my Theory of Complexes). Imagine yourself, at the age of

five years, with the mental

power and resources of an adult.

Direct experience of the unconscious or cellular level of awareness is

possible through the use of those

drugs labeled psychedelic, such as marijuana and LSD, however, it can be a

frightening experience, since at

this level one has access to all of the experiences of life, rather than the

narrow set of experiences of the

conscious life of the individual. Sampling these memories isn't considered to be

adapted behavior, since that

time will be at the expense of the conscious complex's adaptation. None the

less, it can be helpful spiritually if

experienced sparingly. For those who have become lost through failure to

properly interpret the experiences of

life, it can be an escape from a painful existence.

 

http://ww2.dixie-net.com/schiller/science/dna.htm