Anotine/interbeing

[Guest guest]

Dear Antoine,

Thanks for your way of looking at this.

For me, there is no choice or not choice

involved in "voidness".

 

It's precisely where A and not-A

arise mutually that this "void" is

found. If one can say there is

void and not-void, then one must

ask from whence arises that boundary?

 

To say that the void resonates

and is alive is merely poetry.

 

Another shred of poetry

cast into the void :-)

 

-- Love --

 

 

At 12:53 PM 1/9/00 -0500, you wrote:

>Antoine <carrea

>

>Hello Dan,

>

>According to your "definitions" of Interbeing, or "interdependent

>origination" and that of empathy leading to that of the void:

>

>The Aristotelian principle saying that A is not equal to not A. In other

>words that there can exist something totally different than the object

>defined as A. Or, lest say, the pain or joy that is felt in this space

>time, that is called mine by habit of culture and perception, is totally

>different than the one that felt by "you", in your defined habit of

>perception. This principle creating an here and a there, I do not know

>it's name , would be here called Void? "The void is alive and

>resonating". And it seems that the entities created by this principle,

>have the "choice" to create more or less of that void.

>

>Are we that void, or are we not?

>To Be or not to Be, that is the question