Guest guest Posted January 18, 2000 Report Share Posted January 18, 2000 At 02:25 PM 1/18/00 +0100, you wrote: >"Mirror" <mirror > >Michael: > >>Simply put: >>Surrender. >>Do nothing. >>Just Be. > >Dan: >>Nothing existing to surrender. >>No one who could possibly do anything. >>No "other state" anywhere. > >Mira: >There is nothing nor anyone in particular to surrender, >because there is no particular. >But this is only discovered when belief in particularity surrenders itself. >There is nothing to do nor not to do, >because there is no one doing it. >But this is only discovered when doing is stopped. >There is no other state anywhere, >because there is no first state either. >But this is only discovered when >surrendering, >doing does nothing, >being just is. > >Love, >Mira Blessings Mira - There is no discovery. This is only not-discovered when all (believed to be) discoveries are un-known. When knowledge is reversed, unknowing knowingness of no-thing alone is (not-is, that is). Beingness and surrender dissolve, as all partialized views dissolve. And dissolution is seen (un-seen, that is) to have never occurred, because nothing ever happened that required dissolution. While discussing this is impossible, far more impossible is the pure unknown knowingness that alone is All. Particulars aren't dissolved - and what is "universal" or "ultimate" need not (cannot) be affirmed. When dealing with particulars - who or what is being dealt with? -- Love -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.