[Xan] Dan/who incarnates? .. 2

[Guest guest]

Hi Chris,

>>Xanma:

>>Just as there is the apparency of a physical body which we perceive through

>>the senses of that body (and we sanely act-as-if is real) there are more

>>subtle bodies. The mental and emotional functions are less dense

>>configurations of energy than the physical and could be thought of as mental

>>and emotional "bodies" because they are unitary - unique to each apparent

>>individual within common structures. Other bodies have temporary existence

>>also, of longer duration than the physical, made of consciousness and finer

>>expressions of energy, bonded with and yet able to function without the

>>physical form. They are what incarnate. All forms appear within and as

>>expressions of Self.

>

>I perceive the "problem" arises also

 

What problem? I don't see any problem stated in that quote.

>from viewing each of the bodies as separate entities ..

>thus creating boundaries that have to be overcome

>in order to move from one body to the next.

>This is a learned perception ..

>a belief stemming from scientific measurement methodology ...

>

>for myself, I see each "subtle body"

>as a progressive densification of a continuum

>from not-thing into form ...

> similar to an exponential curve

> where each "step" is the microcosm of the macrocosm.

>

>I have found that if "life" as we know it is viewed this way,

>then a even a subtle change to one factor in the "equation"

>will shift the shape of the whole curve ...

>

>But the first step is to remove the boundaries ...

>then there are no initiations

> no "mansions"

> no "doorways"

> no "chakras"

>

>and no doing ...

 

But in practice you still treat them like separate bodies. You wash your

physical face... but I'll bet you don't try to clean up the emotions or

the mind with a wash-cloth and soap. ))

 

Love,

Dharma