Guest guest Posted January 23, 2000 Report Share Posted January 23, 2000 "Dan Berkow, PhD" <berkowd Xan: You have shared here a perspective concerning subtle and gross bodies in response to the question raised concerning incarnation as *appearance* only. Your perspective indicates that you perceive bodies, yet such bodies are *appearance* in, of, and through Self. The question becomes, as seen from here, what does it mean to say a body *appears* and such body meanwhile comes from and is within "Self"? What has appeared that is other than Self? If nothing other than Self has ever appeared to appear - how can we meaningfully discuss any "one" who ever incarnates, and how can there be said to be anything other than an imaginary beginning or end to something called "incarnation"? Love, Dan geovani> May I intrude here...? The 'absolute presence' has two facets. One is aparent the other never is. This basic dual manifestation seems to be universal. Beauty, probably, can manifest itself better through this duality. The facet responsable for 'manifestation', is the body of the universe. This body may assume different, and ever evolving presences. There is no such thing, imo, as some kind of final manifestation where this dual aspect is absent - that would be the end. So.....maybe we are travellers....always visiting, manifesting, ever evolving 'bodys' .....to play this universal game/dance.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.