Guest guest Posted January 21, 2000 Report Share Posted January 21, 2000 At 10:14 AM 1/22/00 , you wrote: >Xanma > >Just as there is the apparency of a physical body which we perceive through >the senses of that body (and we sanely act-as-if is real) there are more >subtle bodies. The mental and emotional functions are less dense >configurations of energy than the physical and could be thought of as mental >and emotional "bodies" because they are unitary - unique to each apparent >individual within common structures. Other bodies have temporary existence >also, of longer duration than the physical, made of consciousness and finer >expressions of energy, bonded with and yet able to function without the >physical form. They are what incarnate. All forms appear within and as >expressions of Self. I perceive the "problem" arises also from viewing each of the bodies as separate entities .. thus creating boundaries that have to be overcome in order to move from one body to the next. This is a learned perception .. a belief stemming from scientific measurement methodology ... for myself, I see each "subtle body" as a progressive densification of a continuum from not-thing into form ... similar to an exponential curve where each "step" is the microcosm of the macrocosm. I have found that if "life" as we know it is viewed this way, then a even a subtle change to one factor in the "equation" will shift the shape of the whole curve ... But the first step is to remove the boundaries ... then there are no initiations no "mansions" no "doorways" no "chakras" and no doing ... oh .. then, BTW, mind is an illusory separation from the continuum Christopher Wynter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.