Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Xan/who incarnates?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

At 11:21 PM 1/23/00 -0500, you wrote:

>Xanma

>

>< Xan:

>You have shared here a perspective

>concerning subtle and gross bodies

>in response to the question raised

>concerning incarnation as *appearance* only.

>Your perspective indicates that

>you perceive bodies, yet such bodies

>are *appearance* in, of, and through Self.

>

>The question becomes, as seen from here,

>what does it mean to say a body

>*appears* and such body meanwhile

>comes from and is within "Self"?

>

>What has appeared that is other than Self?

>

>If nothing other than Self has ever appeared

>to appear - how can we meaningfully discuss

>any "one" who ever incarnates, and how

>can there be said to be anything other

>than an imaginary beginning or end to

>something called "incarnation"?

>

>Love,

>Dan >

>

>

>~ Seen in this light there is also no discussion

>about the impossibility of discussion.

>

>We do appear to have carnal forms

>We also appear to have more subtle forms

>There is nothing but Self.

>

>You asked who incarnates.

>Subtle energy forms is the answer.

>

>

>blessings

>xan

 

Dan: Subtle energy forms

are appearances, configurations.

Configurations of subtle forms

involve subtle thought.

In the "thoughtless" there is no

incarnation. The subtle forms

are held together by nothing, except

what has been called "desire" or "thought".

When "desire" and "thought" are seen

as manifestation of emptiness, then

incarnation is seen for what it is,

and what it isn't. Nothing incarnates

because no-thing is all there is, the

whole time. Enjoying the appearance of

incarnation is similar to enjoying an

ice cream cone. One is a more tightly

configured thought-form. Bodies within

bodies, and bodies including other

bodies in their being - there's no end to it.

Thus, there's no beginning to it. Incarnation

has no *real* beginning, hence is a conceptual

convention, useful for some discussions, not

for others. What is important to me here is this: Your

body and my body end up being the same body.

 

So, let me rest here: all of the apparently

diverse bodies are "my" body. There is no

"me" here - so "my" body is "your" body.

"My" body is nature, is the universe,

is no-thingness. "My" body is Love.

Love is the only body there is.

It is no-body's body :-)

 

 

-- Love -- Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...