Guest guest Posted February 27, 2000 Report Share Posted February 27, 2000 >>>> D: The "true subject" is no-subject, is omnipresent and nonlocal. >> All apparent objects then arise and depart without anything arising >> or departing, in and as awareness, with no identifiable subject >> anywhere >. The false is seen as false only now, only as nonembededness >> is experientially truth. > >Moller: >~ Again very, very beautiful! Music to my ears. Please explain what you >mean by the the last sentence referring to non-embededness. D: Wonderful to experience such resonation. As words spoken reverberate, each echo, from "here" to "there," from "there" to "here" endlessly reveals a place that is not a place. As far as nonembededness, that's only when conditions attach not, when Originally Unbounded, beyond being or nonbeing -- in fact, there is no falseness Here, as nothing false can be perceived... the false is "seen as false" because it pertains not, its conditions are not, and perception of it simply isn't... as for what it is that pertains not Here, one might say it is memory taken as reality, past taken as present, known taken as true that does not pertain Here... the sphere of reality constructed by the world is shattered Here, and yet the world continues ... Never to be known to the world's sensorily-based way of knowing, and yet touching the senses totally each moment. Unknown to the senses, including thought, yet animating the senses fully. Love, Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.