Antoine/too small for information

[Guest guest]

Beautiful stuff, Antoine - thank you.

When we identify with the "order" of our constructed

universe, the "primal being" appears to us as chaos.

 

Disidentifying with the constructed universe,

we recognize chaos as ultimate order -

too small to use "information processing,"

too big to need any!

 

Syncronicity underlies the "framework" for logic and time,

surpassing logic and time. Thus synchronicity

has no structure nor structuring agent. To "us"

that seems chaotic. Of "itself", it is Order beyond order.

 

I'm not sure you need to "uncompress" information.

You can release yourself from the need to have or process

information. Then, however information "sorts itself out"

will be fine - and not particularly meaningful :-)

 

Love,

Dan

 

 

>>Antoine:

>>

This general tendency of the "psyche" to compress residual information,

could it not be seen as an expression of the statistics law of gravity

expressed in the correlation factor of F=ma observed by Newton, and the

general observation of Inertial Mass as observed in E=M(initial)c(2),

intuited by Einstein. Their also seem to be a limit to compression,

expressed since Einstein by quantum physics, the E/hT condition. The

_substance_ compressed seems to change properties, sink in a form of Chaos,

under a compression factor smaller than the ratio of E/hT. Under such a

level of compression, information seems to loose content, a form of pure

Will, outside the dimension (or before) in which information _lives_ also

known as the space time continuum, seems to exist. Other school of though,

or should i say of perception, Will call this Will Chaos, as the Chaos

creating order, behind synchronicity.

 

As gravity or Inertia, being an expression or the underlying cause of the

general tendency of the Psyche to compress residual information, - that

could be compared to the tendency of "towards" minimum entropy in

thermodynamics, where the system of study is the universe as a whole, with

one in it, - I would be interested to hear from Gene, if not the World

itself, how one can uncompress information to the point of uncompressing

gravity. And if such an information can possibly be shared....

[Guest guest]

Hello,

 

If you like Antoine's writings, have a look too at Proust.

 

You should find it translated from french in your bookstore.

 

It reminds some people of the way they feel during Kundalini

rising.

 

Greetings from France,

 

Froggy Jacques

 

--

Jacques De Schryver et Linda Steven

http://jdsetls.virtualave.net/Kundalini/kundalini.html

http://members.xoom.fr/jdsetls/

Site de Linda : http://www.multimania.com/lsteven

[Guest guest]

Merci Jacques,

And i never really stopped to read Proust. I was to young, i guess,

when i first opened one of his books. Will do, will do... Balzac

Peau de Chagrin, Maurice Maeterlinck Le trésor des humbles,

Blaise Cendrars Rhum, Victor Hugo, everything, Stephan Zweig, translated,

everything, Herman Hess, Mozart, A child crying or smiling. A bird flying,

A fire place, a single breath.

I talk to much today, lol

So beautifull discoveries, 3 people speaking french on this list.

Antoine

Jacques de Schryver et Linda Steven wrote:

Jacques de Schryver et Linda Steven

<jdsetls (AT) sdv (DOT) fr>

Hello,

If you like Antoine's writings, have a look too at Proust.

You should find it translated from french in your bookstore.

It reminds some people of the way they feel during Kundalini

rising.

Greetings from France,

Froggy Jacques

[Guest guest]

> As always, Dan, i feel this resonance with you, Thank you for expressing

>it so well. The way information sort itself out, isn't it the

>"beautifullness" or the "hugliness" of creation in all its

>meaningfulness...

 

Yes - absolutely!

In all its meaningfulness and

meaninglessness :-)

 

Love,

Dan