Guest guest Posted March 11, 2000 Report Share Posted March 11, 2000 In a message dated 03/11/2000 7:47:53 AM Eastern Standard Time, fisher1 writes: << >>I did not hallucinate or hear voices -- in fact, I never have. Instead, >>these were like waking dreams -- just like my encounters with My Lady, but >>very strong and vivid. > >Yeah, that's how visions are, hovering at the >edge b/n sleep and waking. Are they? You encourage me -- somehow I thought when people had "visions" that meant they actually saw things the way we see anything else. >> Actually, some people do see, just the way we see anything else. Clairvoyance, clairaudience, clairsentience, there are different types of intuition, it has its other side of the coin in that when an intuition is had, sometimes the dragon eats the pain of it too... depends whether the seeing is of divine or individual or collective and whether the seer is meditating daily. L*L*L ~*~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2001 Report Share Posted August 16, 2001 Tony O'Clery wrote: .... > If one is realised then one sees the world as the universal. > > If one isn't realised then one sees it as real, even though it is only > relatively real. Real whilst one is in it. .... Seeing is. No "one sees the world...", nor as universal nor as real. andrew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2001 Report Share Posted August 16, 2001 , andrew macnab <a.macnab@n...> wrote: > Tony O'Clery wrote: > ... > > If one is realised then one sees the world as the universal. > > > > If one isn't realised then one sees it as real, even though it is only > > relatively real. Real whilst one is in it. > ... > > > > Seeing is. > No "one sees the world...", nor as universal nor as real. > > andrew Namaste, Same answer as I gave to the previous nong. I'm not getting into vndism........ONS......Tony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2001 Report Share Posted August 16, 2001 Tony O'Clery wrote: > > , andrew macnab <a.macnab@n...> wrote: > > Tony O'Clery wrote: > > ... > > > If one is realised then one sees the world as the universal. > > > > > > If one isn't realised then one sees it as real, even though it is > only > > > relatively real. Real whilst one is in it. > > ... > > > > > > > > Seeing is. > > No "one sees the world...", nor as universal nor as real. > > > > andrew > > Namaste, > > Same answer as I gave to the previous nong. I'm not getting into > vndism........ONS......Tony. > Of course not. I knew you were going to say that. Just cutting out the groundless assumptions. What's a nong? andrew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.