Guest guest Posted March 17, 2000 Report Share Posted March 17, 2000 Namaste All, Michael wrote: >No, Tony, you are not angry with us. Though you think you are. You know that we did not slaughter all those people and animals. No, Tony, you are angry with god. How can god allow all of this suffering and pain? How can god create and cause all of this madness?< Tony's ans: Well actually I don't believe in a 'Personal God', in the way you have used the expression. So for me there is no God to get angry with. Iswara or the Personal God concept is just the mass of the Jivas, like trees make up a forest. However people have to take responsibility for the results of their actions and others if they benefit from their actions. With regard to terminology it is simpler if we all use the same meaning for things, that's all. Nothing to do with blaspheming. If one is not 'Liberated', it is confusing to use or claim similar conditions. I like many people had my first experiences of Kundalini at a very young age, meditations also. Although at the time I didn't know what they were. I may sound very angry, actually I am not. No more than a headline is. I tend to be somewhat expressive sometimes, O'Clery is nuts. That reminds me it is St Paddy's day and I'm going out. Happy St Pat's Day!!!Everyone!! Sometimes the only thing that works is a blunt statement. No one did discuss it anyway, which is what I half expected. For every adharmic act,or sin, in the Western sense, five persons are mainly responsible. One who commits the sin, one who is the cause, one who encourages the act of 'sin' , one who shows the ways and means to commit the sin and one who witnesses it. All five will have to face the consequences, of the one action. Sin is a bad word perhaps accruing bad karma or taking a step backwards might be better. When Draupadi was being humiliated by Duryodhana and Dussana in the open court, elders like Bhishma and Drona remained as spectators. They did not oppose Duryodhana's heinous act. It is in this context that Vidura pointed out that not only the sinner but the other four persons mentioned above will also go to hell.( bad karma). Since Bhishma, the one of wisdom, was a silent spectator to the humiliation of Draupadi, he had to lie on the bed of arrows for fifty-six days. Had he prevented the humiliation of Draupadi, he would not have suffered thus.(He wished to expiate karma as he was dying). I am talking dualistically here, of course, but I am illustrating that karmas and samskaras can occurr at a subconscious level, and we may not be acutely aware of them. An accessory to facts, so to speak. Kind of like George W.Bush saying he doesn't execute people, Texas does. My intent was to illustrate, Love doesn't always have to be a warm fuzzy. Love is Truth! Om Namah Sivaya, Tony. ===== http://members.xoom.com/aoclery/sanskritglos.htm ASATHO MA SATH GAMAYA, From the unreal lead me to the real, THAMASO MA JYOTHIR GAMAYA, From darkness, lead me to light, MRITHYOR MA AMRITAM GAMAYA.From death, lead me to immortality. OM, SHANTI SHANTI SHANTI. Om, Peace Peace Peace. Talk to your friends online with Messenger. http://im. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.